256J.46 Sanctions.
Subdivision 1. Participants not complying with program requirements. (a) A participant who fails without good cause to comply with the requirements of this chapter, and who is not subject to a sanction under subdivision 2, shall be subject to a sanction as provided in this subdivision. Prior to the imposition of a sanction, a county agency shall provide a notice of intent to sanction under section 256J.57, subdivision 2, and, when applicable, a notice of adverse action as provided in section 256J.31.
(b) A participant who fails to comply with an alternative employment plan must have the plan reviewed by a person trained in domestic violence and a job counselor or the county agency to determine if components of the alternative employment plan are still appropriate. If the activities are no longer appropriate, the plan must be revised with a person trained in domestic violence and approved by a job counselor or the county agency. A participant who fails to comply with a plan that is determined not to need revision will lose their exemption and be required to comply with regular employment services activities.
(c) A sanction under this subdivision becomes effective the month following the month in which a required notice is given. A sanction must not be imposed when a participant comes into compliance with the requirements for orientation under section 256J.45 or third-party liability for medical services under section 256J.30, subdivision 10, prior to the effective date of the sanction. A sanction must not be imposed when a participant comes into compliance with the requirements for employment and training services under sections 256J.49 to 256J.55 ten days prior to the effective date of the sanction. For purposes of this subdivision, each month that a participant fails to comply with a requirement of this chapter shall be considered a separate occurrence of noncompliance. A participant who has had one or more sanctions imposed must remain in compliance with the provisions of this chapter for six months in order for a subsequent occurrence of noncompliance to be considered a first occurrence.
(d) Sanctions for noncompliance shall be imposed as follows:
(1) For the first occurrence of noncompliance by a participant in an assistance unit, the assistance unit's grant shall be reduced by ten percent of the MFIP standard of need for an assistance unit of the same size with the residual grant paid to the participant. The reduction in the grant amount must be in effect for a minimum of one month and shall be removed in the month following the month that the participant returns to compliance.
(2) For a second or subsequent occurrence of noncompliance by a participant in an assistance unit, or when each of the participants in a two-parent assistance unit have a first occurrence of noncompliance at the same time, the assistance unit's shelter costs shall be vendor paid up to the amount of the cash portion of the MFIP grant for which the assistance unit is eligible. At county option, the assistance unit's utilities may also be vendor paid up to the amount of the cash portion of the MFIP grant remaining after vendor payment of the assistance unit's shelter costs. The residual amount of the grant after vendor payment, if any, must be reduced by an amount equal to 30 percent of the MFIP standard of need for an assistance unit of the same size before the residual grant is paid to the assistance unit. The reduction in the grant amount must be in effect for a minimum of one month and shall be removed in the month following the month that the participant in a one-parent assistance unit returns to compliance. In a two-parent assistance unit, the grant reduction must be in effect for a minimum of one month and shall be removed in the month following the month both participants return to compliance. The vendor payment of shelter costs and, if applicable, utilities shall be removed six months after the month in which the participant or participants return to compliance. If an assistance unit is sanctioned under this clause, the participant's case file must be reviewed as required under paragraph (e).
(e) When a sanction under paragraph (d), clause (2), is in effect, the county agency must review the participant's case to determine if the employment plan is still appropriate and attempt to meet with the participant face-to-face. The participant may bring an advocate to the face-to-face meeting. If a face-to-face meeting is not conducted, the county agency must send the participant a written notice that includes the information required under clause (1).
(1) During the face-to-face meeting, the county agency must:
(i) determine whether the continued noncompliance can be explained and mitigated by providing a needed preemployment activity, as defined in section 256J.49, subdivision 13, clause (16), or services under a local intervention grant for self-sufficiency under section 256J.625;
(ii) determine whether the participant qualifies for a good cause exception under section 256J.57;
(iii) determine whether the participant qualifies for an exemption under section 256J.56;
(iv) determine whether the participant qualifies for an exemption from regular employment services requirements for victims of family violence under section 256J.52, subdivision 6;
(v) inform the participant of the participant's sanction status and explain the consequences of continuing noncompliance;
(vi) identify other resources that may be available to the participant to meet the needs of the family; and
(vii) inform the participant of the right to appeal under section 256J.40.
(2) If the lack of an identified activity can explain the noncompliance, the county must work with the participant to provide the identified activity, and the county must restore the participant's grant amount to the full amount for which the assistance unit is eligible. The grant must be restored retroactively to the first day of the month in which the participant was found to lack preemployment activities or to qualify for an exemption under section 256J.56, a good cause exception under section 256J.57, or an exemption for victims of family violence under section 256J.52, subdivision 6.
(3) If the participant is found to qualify for a good cause exception or an exemption, the county must restore the participant's grant to the full amount for which the assistance unit is eligible.
Subd. 1a. Repealed, 1Sp2001 c 9 art 10 s 67
Subd. 2. Sanctions for refusal to cooperate with support requirements. The grant of an MFIP caregiver who refuses to cooperate, as determined by the child support enforcement agency, with support requirements under section 256.741, shall be subject to sanction as specified in this subdivision. The assistance unit's grant must be reduced by 25 percent of the applicable MFIP standard of need. The residual amount of the grant, if any, must be paid to the caregiver. A sanction under this subdivision becomes effective the first month following the month in which a required notice is given. A sanction must not be imposed when a caregiver comes into compliance with the requirements under section 256.741 prior to the effective date of the sanction. The sanction shall be removed in the month following the month that the caregiver cooperates with the support requirements. Each month that an MFIP caregiver fails to comply with the requirements of section 256.741 must be considered a separate occurrence of noncompliance. An MFIP caregiver who has had one or more sanctions imposed must remain in compliance with the requirements of section 256.741 for six months in order for a subsequent sanction to be considered a first occurrence.
Subd. 2a. Dual sanctions. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions 1 and 2, for a participant subject to a sanction for refusal to comply with child support requirements under subdivision 2 and subject to a concurrent sanction for refusal to cooperate with other program requirements under subdivision 1, sanctions shall be imposed in the manner prescribed in this subdivision.
A participant who has had one or more sanctions imposed under this subdivision must remain in compliance with the provisions of this chapter for six months in order for a subsequent occurrence of noncompliance to be considered a first occurrence. Any vendor payment of shelter costs or utilities under this subdivision must remain in effect for six months after the month in which the participant is no longer subject to sanction under subdivision 1.
(b) If the participant was subject to sanction for:
(i) noncompliance under subdivision 1 before being subject to sanction for noncooperation under subdivision 2; or
(ii) noncooperation under subdivision 2 before being subject to sanction for noncompliance under subdivision 1, the participant is considered to have a second occurrence of noncompliance and shall be sanctioned as provided in subdivision 1, paragraph (d), clause (2). Each subsequent occurrence of noncompliance shall be considered one additional occurrence and shall be subject to the applicable level of sanction under subdivision 1, paragraph (d), or section 256J.462. The requirement that the county conduct a review as specified in subdivision 1, paragraph (e), remains in effect.
(c) A participant who first becomes subject to sanction under both subdivisions 1 and 2 in the same month is subject to sanction as follows:
(i) in the first month of noncompliance and noncooperation, the participant's grant must be reduced by 25 percent of the applicable MFIP standard of need, with any residual amount paid to the participant;
(ii) in the second and subsequent months of noncompliance and noncooperation, the participant shall be subject to the applicable level of sanction under subdivision 1, paragraph (d), or section 256J.462.
The requirement that the county conduct a review as specified in subdivision 1, paragraph (e), remains in effect.
(d) A participant remains subject to sanction under subdivision 2 if the participant:
(i) returns to compliance and is no longer subject to sanction under subdivision 1 or section 256J.462; or
(ii) has the sanction under subdivision 1, paragraph (d), or section 256J.462 removed upon completion of the review under subdivision 1, paragraph (e).
A participant remains subject to the applicable level of sanction under subdivision 1, paragraph (d), or section 256J.462 if the participant cooperates and is no longer subject to sanction under subdivision 2.
HIST: 1997 c 85 art 1 s 36; 1997 c 245 art 4 s 2; 1998 c 407 art 6 s 84-86; 1999 c 245 art 6 s 55-57; 1Sp2001 c 9 art 10 s 31,32
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes