1999 Minnesota Statutes
- Search Minnesota Statutes
- About Minnesota Statutes
- 1999 Statutes New, Amended or Repealed
- 1999 Table of Chapters
Chapter 244
Section 244.10
Recent History
- 2024 Subd. 8 Revisor Instruction 2024 c 127 art 50 s 42
- 2024 Subd. 8 Revisor Instruction 2024 c 125 art 5 s 52
- 2009 Subd. 5a New 2009 c 59 art 5 s 8
- 2006 Subd. 5 Amended 2006 c 260 art 1 s 1
- 2006 Subd. 6 Amended 2006 c 260 art 1 s 2
- 2006 Subd. 7 Amended 2006 c 260 art 1 s 3
- 2005 Subd. 2a Repealed 2005 c 136 art 16 s 16
- 2005 Subd. 2a Amended 2005 c 136 art 3 s 18
- 2005 Subd. 3 Repealed 2005 c 136 art 16 s 16
- 2005 Subd. 4 New 2005 c 136 art 16 s 3
- 2005 Subd. 5 Amended 2005 c 7 s 17
- 2005 Subd. 5 New 2005 c 136 art 16 s 4
- 2005 Subd. 6 New 2005 c 136 art 16 s 5
- 2005 Subd. 7 New 2005 c 136 art 16 s 6
- 2005 Subd. 8 New 2005 c 136 art 16 s 7
- 2005 Subd. 9 New 2005 c 136 art 16 s 8
- 2000 Subd. 2a Amended 2000 c 311 art 2 s 13
- 1996 Subd. 2a New 1996 c 408 art 5 s 6
244.10 Sentencing hearing; deviation from guidelines.
Subdivision 1. Sentencing hearing. Whenever a person is convicted of a felony, the court, upon motion of either the defendant or the state, shall hold a sentencing hearing. The hearing shall be scheduled so that the parties have adequate time to prepare and present arguments regarding the issue of sentencing. The parties may submit written arguments to the court prior to the date of the hearing and may make oral arguments before the court at the sentencing hearing. Prior to the hearing, the court shall transmit to the defendant or the defendant's attorney and the prosecuting attorney copies of the presentence investigation report.
At the conclusion of the sentencing hearing or within 20 days thereafter, the court shall issue written findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the issues submitted by the parties, and shall enter an appropriate order.
Subd. 2. Deviation from guidelines. Whether or not a sentencing hearing is requested pursuant to subdivision 1, the district court shall make written findings of fact as to the reasons for departure from the sentencing guidelines in each case in which the court imposes or stays a sentence that deviates from the sentencing guidelines applicable to the case.
Subd. 2a. Notice of information regarding sex offenders. (a) In any case in which a person is convicted of an offense which requires registration under section 243.166, subdivision 1, and the presumptive sentence under the sentencing guidelines is commitment to the custody of the commissioner of corrections, if the court grants a dispositional departure and stays imposition or execution of sentence, the probation or court services officer who is assigned to supervise the offender shall provide in writing to the following the fact that the offender is on probation and the terms and conditions of probation:
(1) a victim of and any witnesses to the offense committed by the offender, if the victim or the witness has requested notice; and
(2) the chief law enforcement officer in the area where the offender resides or intends to reside.
The law enforcement officer, in consultation with the offender's probation officer, may provide all or part of this information to any of the following agencies or groups the offender is likely to encounter: public and private educational institutions, day care establishments, and establishments or organizations that primarily serve individuals likely to be victimized by the offender.
The probation officer is not required under this subdivision to provide any notice while the offender is placed or resides in a residential facility that is licensed under section 245A.02, subdivision 14, or 241.021, if the facility staff is trained in the supervision of sex offenders.
(b) The notice authorized by paragraph (a) shall be limited to data classified as public under section 13.84, subdivision 6, unless the offender provides informed consent to authorize the release of nonpublic data or unless a court order authorizes the release of nonpublic data.
(c) Nothing in this subdivision shall be interpreted to impose a duty on any person to use any information regarding an offender about whom notification is made under this subdivision.
Subd. 3. Computation of criminal history score. If the defendant contests the existence of or factual basis for a prior conviction in the calculation of the defendant's criminal history score, proof of it is established by competent and reliable evidence, including a certified court record of the conviction.
HIST: 1978 c 723 art 1 s 10; 1986 c 444; 1988 c 520 s 1; 1996 c 408 art 5 s 6
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes