Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes
[*Add Subtitle/link: Office]

Menu

Revisor of Statutes Menu

2007 Minnesota Statutes

This is a historical version of this statute section. Also view the most recent published version.

14.388 GOOD CAUSE EXEMPTION.
    Subdivision 1. Requirements. If an agency for good cause finds that the rulemaking
provisions of this chapter are unnecessary, impracticable, or contrary to the public interest when
adopting, amending, or repealing a rule to:
(1) address a serious and immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare;
(2) comply with a court order or a requirement in federal law in a manner that does not allow
for compliance with sections 14.14 to 14.28;
(3) incorporate specific changes set forth in applicable statutes when no interpretation of law
is required; or
(4) make changes that do not alter the sense, meaning, or effect of a rule,
the agency may adopt, amend, or repeal the rule after satisfying the requirements of subdivision 2
and section 14.386, paragraph (a), clauses (1) to (4). The agency shall incorporate its findings and
a brief statement of its supporting reasons in its order adopting, amending, or repealing the rule.
After considering the agency's statement and any comments received, the Office of
Administrative Hearings shall determine whether the agency has provided adequate justification
for its use of this section.
Rules adopted, amended, or repealed under clauses (1) and (2) are effective for a period of
two years from the date of publication of the rule in the State Register.
Rules adopted, amended, or repealed under clause (3) or (4) are effective upon publication
in the State Register.
    Subd. 2. Notice. An agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule under this section
must give electronic notice of its intent in accordance with section 16E.07, subdivision 3, and
notice by United States mail or electronic mail to persons who have registered their names with
the agency under section 14.14, subdivision 1a. The notice must be given no later than the date
the agency submits the proposed rule to the Office of Administrative Hearings for review of its
legality and must include:
(1) the proposed rule, amendment, or repeal;
(2) an explanation of why the rule meets the requirements of the good cause exemption
under subdivision 1; and
(3) a statement that interested parties have five business days after the date of the notice to
submit comments to the Office of Administrative Hearings.
    Subd. 3. Review by chief judge. If a rule has been disapproved by an administrative law
judge, the agency may ask the chief administrative law judge to review the rule. The agency must
give notice of its request for review in accordance with subdivision 2. The notice must be given
no later than the date the agency requests review by the chief judge and must include a summary
of any information or arguments the agency intends to submit to the chief judge that were not
submitted to the judge who disapproved the rule.
    Subd. 4. Costs. The costs of any proceeding conducted by the Office of Administrative
Hearings in accordance with this section must be paid by the agency seeking to adopt, amend,
or repeal a rule under this section.
History: 1995 c 233 art 2 s 29; 2001 c 106 s 20; 2003 c 2 art 1 s 4; 1Sp2003 c 6 s 1

700 State Office Building, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., St. Paul, MN 55155 ♦ Phone: (651) 296-2868 ♦ TTY: 1-800-627-3529 ♦ Fax: (651) 296-0569