2026 Minnesota Statutes
- Search Minnesota Statutes
- About Minnesota Statutes
- 2026 Statutes New, Amended or Repealed
- 2026 Table of Chapters
- 2026 Statutes Topics (Index)
Chapter 256B
Section 256B.076
Recent History
- 2026 Subd. 1 Amended 2026 c 121 art 3 s 48
- 2026 Subd. 5 New 2026 c 121 art 3 s 49
- 2026 Subd. 6 New 2026 c 121 art 3 s 50
- 2026 Subd. 7 New 2026 c 121 art 3 s 51
- 2026 Subd. 8 New 2026 c 121 art 3 s 52
- 2024 Subd. 4 New 2024 c 127 art 46 s 12
- 2024 Subd. 4 New 2024 c 125 art 1 s 12
- 2021 256B.076 New 2021 c 7 art 11 s 24
256B.076 CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES.
Subdivision 1.Generally.
(a) It is the policy of this state to ensure that individuals on medical assistance receive cost-effective and coordinated care, including efforts to address the profound effects of housing instability, food insecurity, and other social determinants of health. Therefore, subject to federal approval, medical assistance covers targeted case management services as described in this section and sections 245.4711; 245.4881; 256B.0625, subdivisions 20 to 20b; 256B.0924; 256B.094; and 256F.10.
(b) The commissioner, in collaboration with Tribes, counties, providers, and individuals served, must propose further modifications to targeted case management services to ensure a program that complies with all federal requirements, delivers services in a cost-effective and efficient manner, creates uniform expectations for targeted case management services, addresses health disparities, and promotes person- and family-centered services.
(c) The commissioner may suspend, reduce, or terminate the reimbursement to a provider that does not meet the requirements of this section or section 245.4711; 245.4881; 256B.0625, subdivisions 20 and 20b; 256B.0924; 256B.094; or 256F.10. The county of financial responsibility, as determined under chapter 256G or, if applicable, the Tribal agency, is responsible for any federal disallowances. The county or Tribal agency may share the financial responsibility with the county's or Tribal agency's contracted vendors.
Subd. 2.Rate setting.
(a) The commissioner must develop and implement a statewide rate methodology for any county that subcontracts targeted case management services to a vendor. The commissioner must publish the final draft of the proposed rate methodology at least 30 days prior to posting the state plan amendment for public comment and must take stakeholder feedback into consideration by providing an opportunity for the public to provide feedback on the proposed rate methodology. The commissioner must respond to comments received before the submission of the state plan amendment, explaining the commissioner's decisions regarding the responses and identifying any changes made in an effort to respond to public feedback. On January 1, 2022, or upon federal approval, whichever is later, a county must use this methodology for any targeted case management services paid by medical assistance and delivered through a subcontractor.
(b) In setting this rate, the commissioner must include the following:
(1) prevailing wages;
(2) employee-related expense factor;
(3) paid time off and training factors;
(4) supervision and span of control;
(5) distribution of time factor;
(6) administrative factor;
(7) absence factor;
(8) program support factor;
(9) caseload sizes as published by the commissioner; and
(10) culturally specific program factor as described in subdivision 3.
(c) A county may request that the commissioner authorize a rate based on a different caseload size when a subcontractor is assigned to serve individuals with needs, such as homelessness or specific linguistic or cultural needs, that significantly differ from other eligible populations. A county must include the following in the request:
(1) the number of clients to be served by a full-time equivalent staffer;
(2) the specific factors that require a case manager to provide a significantly different number of hours of reimbursable services to a client; and
(3) how the county intends to monitor caseload size and outcomes.
(d) The commissioner must adjust only the factor for caseload size in paragraph (b), clause (9), in response to a request under paragraph (c). The commissioner must not duplicate costs assumed by the culturally specific program factor in paragraph (b), clause (10), in response to a request under paragraph (c). With agreement of counties and in consultation with other stakeholders, the commissioner may introduce factors and adjustments other than those listed in paragraphs (b) and (c), subject to federal approval.
Subd. 3.Culturally specific program.
(a) "Culturally specific program" means a targeted case management program that:
(1) ensures effective, equitable, comprehensive, and respectful quality care services that are responsive to individuals within a specific population's values, beliefs, practices, health literacy, preferred language, and other communication needs;
(2) is designed to address the unique needs of individuals who share a common language or racial, ethnic, or social background;
(3) is governed with significant input from individuals of the specific background that the program is designed to serve; and
(4) employs individuals to provide targeted case management, at least 50 percent of whom are of the specific background that the program is designed to serve.
(b) The culturally specific program factor in subdivision 2, paragraph (b), clause (10), adjusts the targeted case management rate for culturally specific programs to reflect the staffing and programmatic costs necessary to provide culturally specific targeted case management.
Subd. 4.Case management provided under contract.
If a county agency provides case management under contracts with other individuals or agencies and the county agency utilizes a competitive proposal process for the procurement of contracted case management services, the competitive proposal process must include evaluation criteria to ensure that the county maintains a culturally responsive program for case management services adequate to meet the needs of the population of the county. For the purposes of this section, "culturally responsive program" means a case management services program that:
(1) ensures effective, equitable, comprehensive, and respectful quality care services that are responsive to individuals within a specific population's values, beliefs, practices, health literacy, preferred language, and other communication needs; and
(2) is designed to address the unique needs of individuals who share a common language or racial, ethnic, or social background.
Subd. 5.County-provided fee-for-service rate setting and reconciliation.
(a) Effective January 1 of the implementation year determined in the joint governance agreement under subdivision 6, or upon federal approval, whichever is later, the commissioner must pay targeted case management services for which counties provide the nonfederal share of money and county staff provide the services on a fee-for-service basis according to the cost-based payment methodology in this subdivision and consistent with the federal regulations related to certified public expenditures. To receive federal reimbursement for these services, a county providing eligible targeted case management services must complete a federally approved cost report in accordance with section 256.01, subdivision 2, paragraph (o).
(b) The commissioner must reimburse submitted claims based on an interim rate and must determine a final rate on a calendar-year basis following completion of a cost report reconciliation. The commissioner must notify counties of the final rate and post final rates publicly.
(c) To appeal a final rate determined by the commissioner under paragraph (b), a county must submit a written appeal request to the commissioner within 60 days after the date the commissioner issued the final rate determination. The appeal request must specify the disputed items and the name and address of the person to contact regarding the appeal.
(d) The payment methodology under this section must only be used to reimburse allowable medical assistance costs. The county of financial responsibility, as determined under chapter 256G, is responsible for any federal disallowances.
(e) Upon implementation, the commissioner must base interim rates on data from the testing period. The commissioner must base subsequent interim rates for a calendar year on the most recently completed reconciliation. The commissioner must notify counties of the interim rate by June 30 each year and post interim rates publicly. If the commissioner is unable to notify the counties by June 30, the commissioner must notify each county in writing no later than June 30 that the new interim rate is delayed and must provide an estimate of when the new interim rate will be available.
(f) Payments to counties for targeted case management expenditures under this section must be made only from federal earnings from services provided under this section.
(g) Counties must submit all claims for targeted case management services described in this section using a 15-minute unit.
Subd. 6.Testing and implementation.
The commissioners of human services and children, youth, and families; the Association of Minnesota Counties (AMC); and the Minnesota Association of County Social Service Administrators (MACSSA) must collaborate to establish a joint governance agreement. The joint governance agreement must:
(1) establish system functionality requirements to (i) meet the business needs of local agencies providing targeted case management services and (ii) comply with applicable state and federal regulations for the Social Services Information System (SSIS), SSIS's replacement, and adjacent systems and the targeted case management cost report under subdivision 5;
(2) establish a schedule for transition planning, including but not limited to fiscal impact assessment and training; and
(3) specify that the rate method established in subdivision 5 must not be implemented without both the completion of a required testing period of 12 calendar months and the express approval by the commissioners of human services and children, youth, and families; AMC; and MACSSA.
Subd. 7.Managed care plan units and rates for mental health targeted case management.
The commissioner must ensure that the prepaid health plans providing covered health services for eligible persons pursuant to this chapter and section 256L.03, subdivisions 1a and 1b, reimburse counties at a rate that is at least equal to the fee-for-service rate described in subdivision 5 for targeted case management services provided to Minnesota health care program (MHCP) health plan enrollees covered by medical assistance. If, for any contract year, federal approval is not received for this subdivision, the commissioner must adjust the capitation rates paid to managed care plans and county-based purchasing plans for that contract year to reflect the removal of this subdivision. Contracts between managed care plans and county-based purchasing plans and providers to whom this subdivision applies must allow recovery of payments from those providers if capitation rates are adjusted in accordance with this subdivision. Payment recoveries must not exceed the amount equal to any increase in rates that results from this subdivision. This subdivision expires if federal approval is not received for this subdivision at any time. This subdivision does not obligate MHCP health plans to contract with counties for the provision of targeted case management services.
Subd. 8.Targeted case management gap funding.
(a) For purposes of this subdivision, "unacceptable loss" means when a county's finalized amount of targeted case management federal reimbursement following the commissioner's reconciliation for a calendar year for targeted case management under subdivision 5 is less than 90 percent of the average federal reimbursement received by that county during the base calendar years determined in paragraph (c).
(b) The commissioner must pay targeted case management gap funding in the amount and time frame specified in paragraph (c) to an individual county for calendar years in which the county experiences an unacceptable loss.
(c) The base calendar years are the three calendar years immediately before the testing period of 12 calendar months determined under subdivision 6. In consultation with the county that experienced the unacceptable loss, the commissioner must make appropriate adjustments to base year amounts as needed to prevent the base amounts from being unduly influenced by onetime events, anomalies, or small changes that appear large compared to a narrow historical base. The commissioner must not make adjustments to the eight county human services agencies that received the greatest amount of targeted case management federal reimbursement during the base calendar years. For agencies other than the eight county human services agencies that received the greatest amount, the total of all adjustments for a given calendar year must not exceed two percent of statewide federal targeted case management federal reimbursement that calendar year.
(d) The commissioner must pay targeted case management gap funding to the applicable county in an amount equaling the difference between the finalized amount of targeted case management federal reimbursement after reconciliation for that calendar year and 90 percent of the average federal reimbursement received by that county during the base calendar years, including any adjustments under paragraph (c). The commissioner must pay the county within 90 days of completing the reconciliation under subdivision 5.
(e) Targeted case management gap funding is a forecasted program under section 16A.11.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes