Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Office of the Revisor of Statutes

    Subdivision 1. Submittal to binding arbitration. If a dispute remains unresolved after
the close of mediation, the dispute shall be submitted to binding arbitration within 60 days of
issuance of the mediation report pursuant to the terms of this section and the Uniform Arbitration
Act, sections 572.08 to 572.30, except the period may be extended for an additional 15 days
as provided in this section. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Uniform
Arbitration Act and this section, this section controls.
    Subd. 2. Appointment of panel. (a) The parties shall each appoint one qualified arbitrator
within 30 days of issuance of the mediation report. If a party does not appoint an arbitrator within
30 days, the Bureau of Mediation Services shall appoint a qualified arbitrator from the list of
neutrals under sections 572A.01, subdivision 2, and 572A.015, subdivision 2, or someone else for
the party. The parties shall notify the bureau prior to the close of the 30-day appointment period of
the name and address of their respective appointed arbitrator. Each party is responsible for the
fees and expenses for the arbitrator it selects.
(b) After appointment of the two arbitrators to the arbitration panel by the parties, or by the
bureau should one or both of the parties fail to act, the two appointed arbitrators shall appoint a
third arbitrator who must be learned in the law, within 15 days of the close of the initial 30-day
arbitrator appointment period. If the arbitrators cannot agree on the selection of the third arbitrator
within 15 days, the arbitrators shall jointly submit a request to the district court of the county
in which the disputed area is located in accordance with the selection procedures established in
section 572.10. Within 15 days of receipt of an application by the district court, the district court
shall select a neutral arbitrator and notify the parties and the Bureau of Mediation Services of the
name and address of the selected arbitrator. The fees and expenses of the third arbitrator shall be
shared equally by the parties. The third appointed arbitrator shall act as chair of the arbitration
panel and shall conduct the proceedings. If the district court selects the third arbitrator, the date
required for first hearing the matter may be extended an additional 15 days.
    Subd. 3. Hearing. Except as otherwise provided, within 60 days, the matter must be brought
on for hearing in accordance with section 572.12. The Bureau of Mediation Services shall provide
for the proceedings to occur in the county in which the majority of the affected property is located.
    Subd. 4. Contracts; information. The arbitration panel shall have authority to contract with
regional, state, county, or local planning commissions or to hire expert consultants to provide
specialized information and assistance. Any member of the panel conducting or participating in
any hearing shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations, to issue subpoenas, and
to compel the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of papers, books, and
documents. Any costs related to this subdivision shall be shared equally by the parties.
    Subd. 5. Decision factors. In comprehensive planning disputes, the arbitration panel shall
consider the goals stated in section 4A.08 and the following factors in making a decision. In
all other disputes brought under this section, the arbitration panel shall consider the following
factors in making a decision:
(1) present population and number of households, past population, and projected population
growth of the subject area and adjacent units of local government;
(2) quantity of land within the subject area and adjacent units of local government; and
natural terrain including recognizable physical features, general topography, major watersheds,
soil conditions, and such natural features as rivers, lakes, and major bluffs;
(3) degree of contiguity of the boundaries between the municipality and the subject area;
(4) present pattern of physical development, planning, and intended land uses in the
subject area and the municipality including residential, industrial, commercial, agricultural, and
institutional land uses and the impact of the proposed action on those land uses;
(5) the present transportation network and potential transportation issues, including proposed
highway development;
(6) land use controls and planning presently being utilized in the municipality and the subject
area, including comprehensive plans for development in the area and plans and policies of the
Metropolitan Council, and whether there are inconsistencies between proposed development and
existing land use controls and the reasons therefore;
(7) existing levels of governmental services being provided in the municipality and the
subject area, including water and sewer service, fire rating and protection, law enforcement, street
improvements and maintenance, administrative services, and recreational facilities and the impact
of the proposed action on the delivery of said services;
(8) existing or potential environmental problems and whether the proposed action is likely to
improve or resolve these problems;
(9) plans and programs by the municipality for providing needed governmental services to
the subject area;
(10) an analysis of the fiscal impact on the municipality, the subject area, and adjacent units
of local government, including net tax capacity and the present bonded indebtedness, and the
local tax rates of the county, school district, and township;
(11) relationship and effect of the proposed action on affected and adjacent school districts
and communities;
(12) adequacy of town government to deliver services to the subject area;
(13) analysis of whether necessary governmental services can best be provided through the
proposed action or another type of boundary adjustment; and
(14) if only a part of a township is annexed, the ability of the remainder of the township
to continue or the feasibility of it being incorporated separately or being annexed to another
Any party to the proceeding may present evidence and testimony on any of the above factors at
the hearing on the matter.
    Subd. 6. Decision. The arbitrators, after a hearing on the matter, shall make a decision
regarding the dispute within 60 days and transmit an order to the parties and the Office of Strategic
and Long-Range Planning. Unless appealed by an aggrieved party within 30 days of receipt of
the arbitration panel's order by the office, the office shall execute an order in accordance with
the arbitration panel's order and shall cause copies of the same to be mailed to all parties entitled
to mailed notice, the secretary of state, the Department of Revenue, the state demographer,
individual property owners if initiated in that manner, the affected county auditor, and any other
party of record. The affected county auditor shall record the order against the affected property.
History: 1997 c 202 art 6 s 3; 2003 c 2 art 5 s 15

Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes