Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Office of the Revisor of Statutes

333.285 DILUTION OF DISTINCTIVE FAMOUS MARK MAY BE ENJOINED.
(a) The owner of a mark that is famous in this state may, subject to the principles of equity and
upon terms the court considers reasonable: seek an injunction against another person's commercial
use of a mark or trade name, if the use begins after the mark has become famous and causes
dilution of the distinctive quality of the mark; and obtain other relief as provided in this section.
In determining whether a mark is distinctive and famous, a court may consider factors
such as, but not limited to:
(1) the degree of inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the mark in this state;
(2) the duration and extent of use of the mark in connection with the goods and services
with which the mark is used;
(3) the duration and extent of advertising and publicity of the mark in this state;
(4) the geographical extent of the trading area in which the mark is used;
(5) the channels of trade for the goods or services with which the mark is used;
(6) the degree of recognition of the mark in the trading areas and channels of trade in this
state used by the mark's owner and the person against whom the injunction is sought;
(7) the nature and extent of use of the same or similar mark by third parties; and
(8) whether the mark is the subject of a state registration in this state, or a federal registration
under the Act of March 3, 1881, or under the Act of February 20, 1905, or on the principal register.
(b) In an action brought under this section, the owner of a famous mark is entitled only to
injunctive relief in this state, unless the person against whom the injunctive relief is sought
willfully intended to trade on the owner's reputation or to cause dilution of the famous mark.
If willful intent is proven, the owner is entitled to the remedies in this chapter, subject to the
discretion of the court and the principles of equity.
(c) The following are not actionable under this section:
(1) fair use of a famous mark by another person in comparative commercial advertising or
promotion to identify the competing goods or services of the owner of the famous mark;
(2) noncommercial use of the mark; and
(3) all forms of news reporting and news commentary.
History: 1998 c 315 s 10

Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes