Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Office of the Revisor of Statutes

125A.45 INTERAGENCY DISPUTE PROCEDURE.
(a) A dispute between a school board and a county board that is responsible for implementing
the provisions of section 125A.29 regarding early identification, child and family assessment,
service coordination, and IFSP development and implementation must be resolved according to
this subdivision when the dispute involves services provided to children and families eligible
under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, United States Code, title 20, section 1471
et seq. (Part C, Public Law 102-119).
(b) A dispute occurs when the school board and county board are unable to agree as to who
is responsible to coordinate, provide, pay for, or facilitate payment for services from public
and private sources.
(c) Written and signed disputes must be filed with the local primary agency.
(d) The local primary agency must attempt to resolve the matter with the involved school
board and county board and may request mediation from the commissioner of the state lead
agency for this purpose.
(e) When interagency disputes have not been resolved within 30 calendar days, the local
primary agency must request the commissioner of the state lead agency to review the matter with
the commissioners of health and human services and make a decision. The commissioner must
provide a consistent process for reviewing those procedures. The commissioners' decision is
binding subject to the right of an aggrieved party to appeal to the state Court of Appeals.
(f) The local primary agency must ensure that eligible children and their families receive
early intervention services during resolution of a dispute. While a local dispute is pending, the
local primary agency must either assign financial responsibility to an agency or pay for the service
from the early intervention account under section 125A.35. If in resolving the dispute, it is
determined that the assignment of financial responsibility was inappropriate, the responsibility
for payment must be reassigned to the appropriate agency and the responsible agency must
make arrangements for reimbursing any expenditures incurred by the agency originally assigned
financial responsibility.
History: 1994 c 647 art 3 s 9,34; 1Sp1995 c 3 art 16 s 13; 1996 c 412 art 3 s 4,5; 1Sp1997 c
4 art 2 s 1; 1998 c 397 art 2 s 56,164; art 11 s 3; 1Sp2003 c 9 art 10 s 13