Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
Laws of Minnesota 1991
CHAPTER 69-H.F.No. 274
An act relating to commerce; motor vehicle sales and
distribution; regulating franchises; proscribing
certain acts; providing remedies; amending Minnesota
Statutes 1990, sections 80E.04, subdivision 1, and by
adding a subdivision; 80E.05; 80E.06, subdivision 2;
80E.12; and 80E.13.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 80E.04,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. [REQUIREMENTS.] Each new motor vehicle
manufacturer shall specify in writing to each of its new motor
vehicle dealers licensed in this state the dealer's obligations
for preparation, delivery, and warranty service on its
products. The manufacturer shall also compensate the new motor
vehicle dealer for warranty service and parts required of the
dealer by the manufacturer, and shall provide the dealer the
schedule of compensation to be paid the dealer for parts, work,
and service in connection with warranty services, and the time
allowance for the performance of the work and service. This
section applies to all repair services performed by the dealer
for the manufacturer or with the approval of the manufacturer
and for which the dealer receives compensation or reimbursement
from the manufacturer.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 80E.04, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 6. For purposes of this section, the terms
"manufacturer" and "dealer" include manufacturers and
distributors of motor vehicle engines and their dealers.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 80E.05, is
amended to read:
80E.05 [INDEMNIFICATION REQUIRED.]
Notwithstanding the terms of any franchise agreement to the
contrary, it shall be a violation of sections 80E.01 to 80E.17
for any new motor vehicle manufacturer to fail to indemnify and
hold harmless its franchised dealers against any judgment for
damages, including, but not limited to, those based on strict
liability, negligence, misrepresentation, warranty (express or
implied), or revocation of acceptance as is defined in section
336.2-608, where the complaint, claim, or lawsuit relates solely
to the alleged defective or negligent manufacture, assembly, or
design of new motor vehicles, parts or accessories or other
functions by the manufacturer, beyond the control of the dealer.
Indemnification under this section must include court costs,
reasonable attorney fees, and expert witness fees incurred by
the motor vehicle dealer.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 80E.06,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. [CIRCUMSTANCES CONSTITUTING GOOD CAUSE.]
Notwithstanding the terms of any franchise agreement or waiver
to the contrary, good cause exists for the purposes of a
termination, cancellation, or nonrenewal, when the new motor
vehicle dealer fails to comply with a provision of the franchise
which is both reasonable and of material significance to the
franchise relationship; provided, that the dealer has been
notified in writing of the failure within 180 days after the
manufacturer first acquired knowledge of the failure.
If failure by the new motor vehicle dealer relates to the
performance of the new motor vehicle dealer in sales or service,
then good cause shall be defined as the failure of the new motor
vehicle dealer to comply with reasonable performance criteria
established by the manufacturer; provided, that the new motor
vehicle dealer was apprised by the manufacturer in writing of
the failure; the notification stated that notice was provided
for failure of performance pursuant to sections 80E.01 to
80E.17; the new motor vehicle dealer was afforded a reasonable
opportunity in no event less than six months to comply with the
criteria; and the dealer did not demonstrate substantial
progress toward compliance with the manufacturer's performance
criteria during the period.
To rebut allegations of good cause for a proposed
termination, a dealer may present evidence including, but not
limited to, a showing that the grounds for termination resulted
from acts or circumstances beyond the control of the dealer and
which were communicated to the manufacturer, or that in
evaluating the dealer's compliance with reasonable sales
criteria, the manufacturer failed to consider the dealer's sales
of factory program vehicles. For the purposes of this
subdivision, "factory program vehicle" means a vehicle of the
current model year offered for sale and resold by the
manufacturer directly or at a factory sponsored or authorized
auction and purchased by a dealer holding a current franchise
from the manufacturer for that same line make.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 80E.12, is
amended to read:
80E.12 [UNLAWFUL ACTS BY MANUFACTURERS, DISTRIBUTORS, OR
FACTORY BRANCHES.]
It shall be unlawful for any manufacturer, distributor, or
factory branch to require a new motor vehicle dealer to do any
of the following:
(a) order or accept delivery of any new motor vehicle, part
or accessory thereof, equipment, or any other commodity not
required by law which has not been voluntarily ordered by the
new motor vehicle dealer, provided that this paragraph does not
modify or supersede reasonable provisions of the franchise
requiring the dealer to market a representative line of the new
motor vehicles the manufacturer or distributor is publicly
advertising;
(b) order or accept delivery of any new motor vehicle, part
or accessory thereof, equipment, or any other commodity not
required by law in order for the dealer to obtain delivery of
any other motor vehicle ordered by the dealer or to qualify for
or participate in any rebate, refund, or similar program offered
by the manufacturer;
(c) order or accept delivery of any new motor vehicle with
special features, accessories, or equipment not included in the
list price of the motor vehicles as publicly advertised by the
manufacturer or distributor;
(d) participate monetarily in an advertising campaign or
contest, or to purchase any promotional materials, showroom, or
other display decorations or materials at the expense of the new
motor vehicle dealer;
(e) enter into any agreement with the manufacturer or to do
any other act prejudicial to the new motor vehicle dealer by
threatening to cancel a franchise or any contractual agreement
existing between the dealer and the manufacturer. Notice in
good faith to any dealer of the dealer's violation of any terms
of the franchise agreement shall not constitute a violation of
sections 80E.01 to 80E.17;
(f) change the capital structure of the new motor vehicle
dealer or the means by or through which the dealer finances the
operation of the dealership; provided, that the new motor
vehicle dealer at all times meets any reasonable capital
standards agreed to by the dealer; and also provided, that no
change in the capital structure shall cause a change in the
principal management or have the effect of a sale of the
franchise without the consent of the manufacturer or distributor
as provided in section 80E.13, paragraph (j);
(g) prevent or attempt to prevent, by contract or
otherwise, any motor vehicle dealer from changing the executive
management control of the new motor vehicle dealer unless the
franchisor proves that the change of executive management will
result in executive management control by a person who is not of
good moral character or who does not meet the franchisor's
existing reasonable capital standards and, with consideration
given to the volume of sales and services of the new motor
vehicle dealer, uniformly applied minimum business experience
standards in the market area; provided, that where the
manufacturer, distributor, or factory branch rejects a proposed
change in executive management control, the manufacturer,
distributor, or factory branch shall give written notice of its
reasons to the dealer;
(h) refrain from participation in the management of,
investment in, or the acquisition of, any other line of new
motor vehicle or related products; provided, however, that this
clause does not apply unless the new motor vehicle dealer
maintains a reasonable line of credit for each make or line of
new motor vehicle, and that the new motor vehicle dealer remains
in substantial compliance with the terms and conditions of the
franchise and with any reasonable facilities requirements of the
manufacturer;
(i) during the course of the agreement, change the location
of the new motor vehicle dealership or make any substantial
alterations to the dealership premises during the course of the
agreement, when to do so would be unreasonable; or
(j) prospectively assent to a release, assignment,
novation, waiver, or estoppel whereby a dealer relinquishes any
rights under sections 80E.01 to 80E.17, or which would relieve
any person from liability imposed by sections 80E.01 to 80E.17
or to require any controversy between a new motor vehicle dealer
and a manufacturer, distributor, or factory branch to be
referred to any person or tribunal other than the duly
constituted courts of this state or the United States, if the
referral would be binding upon the new motor vehicle dealer.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 80E.13, is
amended to read:
80E.13 [UNFAIR PRACTICES BY MANUFACTURERS, DISTRIBUTORS,
FACTORY BRANCHES.]
It is unlawful and an unfair practice for a manufacturer,
distributor, or factory branch to engage in any of the following
practices:
(a) To delay, refuse, or fail to deliver new motor vehicles
or new motor vehicle parts or accessories in reasonable time and
in reasonable quantity relative to the new motor vehicle
dealer's facilities and sales potential in the dealer's relevant
market area, after having accepted an order from a new motor
vehicle dealer having a franchise for the retail sale of any new
motor vehicle sold or distributed by the manufacturer or
distributor, if the new motor vehicle or new motor vehicle parts
or accessories are publicly advertised as being available for
delivery or actually being delivered. This clause is not
violated, however, if the failure is caused by acts or causes
beyond the control of the manufacturer;
(b) To refuse to disclose to any new motor vehicle dealer
handling the same line make, the manner and mode of distribution
of that line make within the relevant market area;
(c) To obtain money, goods, service, or any other benefit
from any other person with whom the dealer does business, on
account of, or in relation to, the transaction between the
dealer and the other person, other than for compensation for
services rendered, unless the benefit is promptly accounted for,
and transmitted to, the new motor vehicle dealer;
(d) To increase prices of new motor vehicles which the new
motor vehicle dealer had ordered for private retail consumers
prior to the dealer's receiving the written official price
increase notification. A sales contract signed by a private
retail consumer shall constitute evidence of each order if the
vehicle is in fact delivered to that customer. In the event of
manufacturer price reductions, the amount of any reduction
received by a dealer shall be passed on to the private retail
consumer by the dealer if the retail price was negotiated on the
basis of the previous higher price to the dealer;
(e) To offer any refunds or other types of inducements to
any new motor vehicle dealer for the purchase of new motor
vehicles of a certain line make to be sold to the state or any
political subdivision thereof without making the same offer to
all other new motor vehicle dealers in the same line make within
the relevant market area;
(f) To release to any outside party, except under subpoena
or in an administrative or judicial proceeding involving the
manufacturer or dealer, any business, financial, or personal
information which may be provided by the dealer to the
manufacturer, without the express written consent of the dealer
or unless pertinent to judicial or governmental administrative
proceedings or to arbitration proceedings of any kind;
(g) To deny any new motor vehicle dealer the right of free
association with any other new motor vehicle dealer for any
lawful purpose;
(h) To unfairly discriminate among its new motor vehicle
dealers with respect to warranty reimbursement or authority
granted its new vehicle dealers to make warranty adjustments
with retail customers;
(i) To compete with a new motor vehicle dealer in the same
line make operating under an agreement or franchise from the
same manufacturer in the relevant market area. A manufacturer
shall not, however, be deemed to be competing when operating a
dealership, either temporarily or for a reasonable period, or in
a bona fide retail operation which is for sale to any qualified
independent person at a fair and reasonable price, or when
involved in a bona fide relationship in which an independent
person has made a significant investment subject to loss in the
dealership and can reasonably expect to acquire full ownership
of the dealership on reasonable terms and conditions;
(j) To prevent a new motor vehicle dealer from receiving
fair and reasonable compensation for the value of the new motor
vehicle dealership. There shall be no transfer, assignment of
the franchise, or major change in the executive management of
the dealership, except as is otherwise provided in sections
80E.01 to 80E.17, without consent of the manufacturer, which
shall not be unreasonably withheld. Denial of the request must
be in writing and delivered to the new motor vehicle dealer
within 60 days after the manufacturer receives the information
necessary to evaluate the proposed transfer. If a denial is not
sent within this period, the manufacturer shall be deemed to
have given its consent to the proposed transfer or change; or
(k) To threaten to modify or replace or modify or replace a
franchise with a succeeding franchise that would adversely alter
the rights or obligations of a new motor vehicle dealer under an
existing franchise or that substantially impairs the sales or
service obligations or investments of the motor vehicle dealer;
(l) To unreasonably deny the right to acquire factory
program vehicles to any dealer holding a valid franchise from
the manufacturer to sell the same line make of vehicles,
provided that the manufacturer may impose reasonable
restrictions and limitations on the purchase or resale of
program vehicles to be applied equitably to all of its
franchised dealers. For the purposes of this paragraph,
"factory program vehicle" has the meaning given the term in
section 4.
Presented to the governor May 7, 1991
Signed by the governor May 10, 1991, 9:13 a.m.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes