language to be deleted (2) new language
Laws of Minnesota 1991 CHAPTER 266-H.F.No. 317 An act relating to marriage dissolution; clarifying procedure for modification of certain custody orders; providing for additional child support payments; providing an alternative form of satisfaction of child support obligation; imposing a fiduciary duty and providing for compensation in cases of breach of that duty; clarifying certain mediation procedures; providing for attorneys' fees in certain cases; clarifying language concerning certain motions; imposing penalties; modifying provisions dealing with cost-of-living adjustments; providing for interest on family law orders; amending Minnesota Statutes 1990, sections 518.18; 518.551, subdivision 5; 518.57, by adding a subdivision; 518.58, subdivision 1, and by adding a subdivision; 518.619, subdivision 6; 518.64, subdivision 2; 518.641, subdivisions 1 and 2; and 549.09, subdivision 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.18, is amended to read: 518.18 [MODIFICATION OF ORDER.] (a) Unless agreed to in writing by the parties, no motion to modify a custody order may be made earlier than one year after the date of the entry of a decree of dissolution or legal separation containing a provision dealing with custody, except in accordance with paragraph (c). (b) If a motion for modification has been heard, whether or not it was granted, unless agreed to in writing by the parties no subsequent motion may be filed within two years after disposition of the prior motion on its merits, except in accordance with paragraph (c). (c) The time limitations prescribed in paragraphs (a) and (b) shall not prohibit a motion to modify a custody order if the court finds that there is persistent and willful denial or interference with visitation, or has reason to believe that the child's present environment may endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development. (d) If the court has jurisdiction to determine child custody matters, the court shall not modify a prior custody order unless it finds, upon the basis of facts that have arisen since the prior order or that were unknown to the court at the time of the prior order, that a change has occurred in the circumstances of the child or the
custodianparties and that the modification is necessary to serve the best interests of the child. In applying these standards the court shall retain the custodiancustody arrangement established by the prior order unless: (i) the custodian agreesboth parties agree to the modification; (ii) the child has been integrated into the family of the petitioner with the consent of the custodianother party; or (iii) the child's present environment endangers the child's physical or emotional health or impairs the child's emotional development and the harm likely to be caused by a change of environment is outweighed by the advantage of a change to the child. In addition, a court may modify a custody order under section 631.52. (e) In deciding whether to modify a prior joint custody order, the court shall apply the standards set forth in paragraph (d) unless: (1) the parties agree in writing to the application of a different standard, or (2) the party seeking the modification is asking the court for permission to move the residence of the child to another state. Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.551, subdivision 5, is amended to read: Subd. 5. [NOTICE TO PUBLIC AUTHORITY; GUIDELINES.] (a) The petitioner shall notify the public authority of all proceedings for dissolution, legal separation, determination of parentage or for the custody of a child, if either party is receiving aid to families with dependent children or applies for it subsequent to the commencement of the proceeding. After receipt of the notice, the court shall set child support as provided in this subdivision. The court may order either or both parents owing a duty of support to a child of the marriage to pay an amount reasonable or necessary for the child's support, without regard to marital misconduct. The court shall approve a child support agreement of the parties if each party is represented by independent counsel, unless the agreement is not in the interest of justice. In other cases the court shall determine and order child support in a specific dollar amount in accordance with the guidelines and the other factors set forth in paragraph (b) and any departure therefrom. The court may also order the obligor to pay child support in the form of a percentage share of the obligor's net bonuses, commissions, or other forms of compensation, in addition to, or if the obligor receives no base pay, in lieu of, an order for a specific dollar amount. The court shall derive a specific dollar amount by multiplying the obligor's net income by the percentage indicated by the following guidelines: Net Income Per Number of Children Month of Obligor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 or more $400 and Below Order based on the ability of the obligor to provide support at these income levels, or at higher levels, if the obligor has the earning ability. $401 - 500 14% 17% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% $501 - 550 15% 18% 21% 24% 26% 28% 30% $551 - 600 16% 19% 22% 25% 28% 30% 32% $601 - 650 17% 21% 24% 27% 29% 32% 34% $651 - 700 18% 22% 25% 28% 31% 34% 36% $701 - 750 19% 23% 27% 30% 33% 36% 38% $751 - 800 20% 24% 28% 31% 35% 38% 40% $801 - 850 21% 25% 29% 33% 36% 40% 42% $851 - 900 22% 27% 31% 34% 38% 41% 44% $901 - 950 23% 28% 32% 36% 40% 43% 46% $951 - 1000 24% 29% 34% 38% 41% 45% 48% $1001- 4000 25% 30% 35% 39% 43% 47% 50% Guidelines for support for an obligor with a monthly income of $4,001 or more shall be the same dollar amounts as provided for in the guidelines for an obligor with a monthly income of $4,000. Net Income defined as: Total monthly income less *(i) Federal Income Tax *(ii) State Income Tax (iii) Social Security Deductions (iv) Reasonable Pension Deductions *Standard Deductions apply- (v) Union Dues use of tax tables (vi) Cost of Dependent Health recommended Insurance Coverage (vii) Cost of Individual or Group Health/Hospitalization Coverage or an Amount for Actual Medical Expenses (viii) A Child Support or Maintenance Order that is Currently Being Paid. "Net income" does not include: (1) the income of the obligor's spouse, but does include in-kind payments received by the obligor in the course of employment, self-employment, or operation of a business if the payments reduce the obligor's living expenses; or (2) compensation received by a party for employment in excess of a 40-hour work week, provided that: (a) support is nonetheless ordered in an amount at least equal to the guidelines amount based on income not excluded under this clause; and (b) the party demonstrates, and the court finds, that: (i) the excess employment began after the filing of the petition for dissolution; (ii) the excess employment reflects an increase in the work schedule or hours worked over that of the two years immediately preceding the filing of the petition; (iii) the excess employment is voluntary and not a condition of employment; (iv) the excess employment is in the nature of additional, part-time or overtime employment compensable by the hour or fraction of an hour; and (v) the party's compensation structure has not been changed for the purpose of affecting a support or maintenance obligation. (b) In addition to the child support guidelines, the court shall take into consideration the following factors in setting or modifying child support: (1) all earnings, income, and resources of the parents, including real and personal property, but excluding income from excess employment of the obligor or obligee that meets the criteria of paragraph (a), clause (2)(b); (2) the financial needs and resources, physical and emotional condition, and educational needs of the child or children to be supported; (3) the standards of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage not been dissolved, but recognizing that the parents now have separate households; (4) the amount of the aid to families with dependent children grant for the child or children; (5) which parent receives the income taxation dependency exemption and what financial benefit the parent receives from it; and (6) the parents' debts as provided in paragraph (c). (c) In establishing or modifying a support obligation, the court may consider debts owed to private creditors, but only if: (1) the right to support has not been assigned under section 256.74; (2) the court determines that the debt was reasonably incurred for necessary support of the child or parent or for the necessary generation of income. If the debt was incurred for the necessary generation of income, the court shall consider only the amount of debt that is essential to the continuing generation of income; and (3) the party requesting a departure produces a sworn schedule of the debts, with supporting documentation, showing goods or services purchased, the recipient of them, the amount of the original debt, the outstanding balance, the monthly payment, and the number of months until the debt will be fully paid. Any schedule prepared under paragraph (c), clause (3), shall contain a statement that the debt will be fully paid after the number of months shown in the schedule, barring emergencies beyond the party's control. Any further departure below the guidelines that is based on a consideration of debts owed to private creditors shall not exceed 18 months in duration, after which the support shall increase automatically to the level ordered by the court. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit one or more step increases in support to reflect debt retirement during the 18-month period. Where payment of debt is ordered pursuant to this section, the payment shall be ordered to be in the nature of child support. (d) Nothing shall preclude the court from receiving evidence on the above factors to determine if the guidelines should be exceeded or modified in a particular case. (e) The above guidelines are binding in each case unless the court makes express findings of fact as to the reason for departure below or above the guidelines. Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.57, is amended by adding a subdivision to read: Subd. 3. [SATISFACTION OF CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION.] The court may conclude that an obligor has satisfied a child support obligation by providing a home, care, and support for the child while the child is living with the obligor, if the court finds that the child was integrated into the family of the obligor with the consent of the obligee and child support payments were not assigned to the public agency under section 256.74. Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.58, subdivision 1, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. [GENERAL.] Upon a dissolution of a marriage, an annulment, or in a proceeding for disposition of property following a dissolution of marriage by a court which lacked personal jurisdiction over the absent spouse or lacked jurisdiction to dispose of the property and which has since acquired jurisdiction, the court shall make a just and equitable division of the marital property of the parties without regard to marital misconduct, after making findings regarding the division of the property. The court shall base its findings on all relevant factors including the length of the marriage, any prior marriage of a party, the age, health, station, occupation, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities, needs, opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets, and income of each party. The court shall also consider the contribution of each in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation or appreciation in the amount or value of the marital property, as well as the contribution of a spouse as a homemaker. It shall be conclusively presumed that each spouse made a substantial contribution to the acquisition of income and property while they were living together as husband and wife. The court may also award to either spouse the household goods and furniture of the parties, whether or not acquired during the marriage. The court shall value marital assets for purposes of division between the parties as of the day of the initially scheduled prehearing settlement conference, unless a different date is agreed upon by the parties, or unless the court makes specific findings that another date of valuation is fair and equitable. If there is a substantial change in value of an asset between the date of valuation and the final distribution, the court may adjust the valuation of that asset as necessary to effect an equitable distribution. During the pendency of a marriage dissolution or annulment proceeding, each party owes a fiduciary duty to the other for any profit or loss derived by the party, without consent of the other, from a transaction or from any use by the party of the marital assets.Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.58, is amended by adding a subdivision to read: Subd. 1a. [TRANSFER, ENCUMBRANCE, CONCEALMENT, OR DISPOSITION OF MARITAL ASSETS.] During the pendency of a marriage dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, or in contemplation of commencing a marriage dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, each party owes a fiduciary duty to the other for any profit or loss derived by the party, without the consent of the other, from a transaction or from any use by the party of the marital assets. If the court finds that a party to a marriage, without consent of the other party, has in contemplation of commencing, or during the pendency of, the current dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of marital assets except in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life, the court shall compensate the other party by placing both parties in the same position that they would have been in had the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal not occurred. The burden of proof under this subdivision is on the party claiming that the other party transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of marital assets in contemplation of commencing or during the pendency of the current dissolution, separation, or annulment proceeding, without consent of the claiming party, and that the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal was not in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life. In compensating a party under this section, the court, in dividing the marital property, may impute the entire value of an asset and a fair return on the asset to the party who transferred, encumbered, concealed, or disposed of it. The absence of a restraining order against the transfer, encumbrance, concealment, or disposal of marital property is not available as a defense under this subdivision. Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.619, subdivision 6, is amended to read: Subd. 6. [MEDIATOR RECOMMENDATIONS.] When the parties have not reached agreement as a result of the mediation proceeding, the mediator may recommend to the court that an investigation be conducted under section 518.167, or that other action be taken to assist the parties to resolve the controversy before hearing on the issues. The mediator may not conduct the investigation or evaluation unless: (1) the parties agree in writing, executed after the termination of mediation, that the mediator may conduct the investigation or evaluation, or (2) there is no other person reasonably available to conduct the investigation or evaluation. The mediator may recommend that mutual restraining orders be issued in appropriate cases, pending determination of the controversy, to protect the well-being of the children involved in the controversy. Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.64, subdivision 2, is amended to read: Subd. 2. [MODIFICATION.] (a) The terms of a decree respecting maintenance or support may be modified upon a showing of one or more of the following: (1) substantially increased or decreased earnings of a party; (2) substantially increased or decreased need of a party; (3) receipt of assistance under sections 256.72 to 256.87; or (4) a change in the cost of living for either party as measured by the federal bureau of statistics, any of which makes the terms unreasonable and unfair. (b) On a motion for modification of maintenance, including a motion for the extension of the duration of a maintenance award, the court shall apply, in addition to all other relevant factors, the factors for an award of maintenance under section 518.552 that exist at the time of the motion. On a motion for modification of support, the court: (1) shall take into consideration the needs of the children and shall not consider the financial circumstances of each party's spouse, if any; and (2) shall not consider compensation received by a party for employment in excess of a 40-hour work week, provided that the party demonstrates, and the court finds, that: (i) the excess employment began after entry of the existing support order; (ii) the excess employment is voluntary and not a condition of employment; (iii) the excess employment is in the nature of additional, part-time employment, or overtime employment compensable by the hour or fractions of an hour; (iv) the party's compensation structure has not been changed for the purpose of affecting a support or maintenance obligation; (v) in the case of an obligor, current child support payments are at least equal to the guidelines amount based on income not excluded under this clause; and (vi) in the case of an obligor who is in arrears in child support payments to the obligee, any net income from excess employment must be used to pay the arrearages until the arrearages are paid in full. (c) A modification of support or maintenance may be made retroactive only with respect to any period during which the petitioning party has pending a motion for modification but only from the date of service of notice of the motion on the responding party. However, modification may be applied to an earlier period if the court makes express findings that the party seeking modification was precluded from serving a motion by reason of a significant physical or mental disability or a material misrepresentation of another party and that the party seeking modification, when no longer precluded, promptly served a motion. (d) Except for an award of the right of occupancy of the homestead, provided in section 518.63, all divisions of real and personal property provided by section 518.58 shall be final, and may be revoked or modified only where the court finds the existence of conditions that justify reopening a judgment under the laws of this state, including motions under section 518.145, subdivision 2. The court may impose a lien or charge on the divided property at any time while the property, or subsequently acquired property, is owned by the parties or either of them, for the payment of maintenance or support money, or may sequester the property as is provided by section 518.24. (e) The court need not hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion for modification of maintenance or support. (f) Section 518.14 shall govern the award of attorney fees for motions brought under this subdivision. Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.641, subdivision 1, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. [REQUIREMENT.] An order for maintenance or child support shall provide for a biennial adjustment in the amount to be paid based on a change in the cost of living. An order that provides for a cost-of-living adjustment shall specify the cost-of-living index to be applied and the date on which the cost-of-living adjustment shall become effective. The court may use the consumer price index for all urban consumers, Minneapolis-St. Paul (CPI-U), the consumer price index for wage earners and clerical, Minneapolis-St. Paul (CPI-W), or another cost-of-living index published by the department of labor which it specifically finds is more appropriate. The court may specify that the housing component be excluded from the cost-of-living adjustment.Cost-of-living increases under this section shall be compounded. The court may also increase the amount by more than the cost-of-living adjustment by agreement of the parties or by making further findings. The adjustment becomes effective on the first of May of the year in which it is made, for cases in which payment is made to the public authority. For cases in which payment is not made to the public authority, application for an adjustment may be made in any month but no application for an adjustment may be made sooner than two years after the date of the dissolution decree. A court may waive the requirement of the cost-of-living clause if it expressly finds that the obligor's occupation or income, or both, does not provide for cost-of-living adjustment or that the order for maintenance or child support has a provision such as a step increase that has the effect of a cost-of-living clause. The court may waive a cost-of-living adjustment in a maintenance order if the parties so agree in writing. The commissioner of human services may promulgate rules for child support adjustments under this section in accordance with the rulemaking provisions of chapter 14. Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 518.641, subdivision 2, is amended to read: Subd. 2. [CONDITIONS.] No adjustment under this section may be made unless the order provides for it and until the following conditions are met: (a) the obligee or public authority serves notice of its application for adjustment by mail on the obligor at the obligor's last known address at least 20 days before the effective date of the adjustment; (b) the notice to the obligor shall informinforms the obligor that anof the date on which the adjustment in payments shallwill become effective on the first of May; and (c) after receipt of notice and before the effective day of the adjustment, the obligor fails to request a hearing on the issue of whether the adjustment should take effect, and ex parte, to stay imposition of the adjustment pending outcome of the hearing. Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 549.09, subdivision 1, is amended to read: Subdivision 1. [WHEN OWED; RATE.] (a) When the judgment is for the recovery of money, including a judgment for the recovery of taxes, interest from the time of the verdict or report until judgment is finally entered shall be computed by the court administrator as provided in clause (c) and added to the judgment. (b) Except as otherwise provided by contract or allowed by law, preverdict or prereport interest on pecuniary damages shall be computed as provided in clause (c) from the time of the commencement of the action, or the time of a written settlement demand, whichever occurs first, except as provided herein. The action must be commenced within 60 days of a written settlement demand for interest to begin to accrue from the time of the demand. If either party serves a written offer of settlement, the other party may serve a written acceptance or a written counteroffer within 60 days. After that time interest on the judgment shall be calculated by the judge in the following manner. The prevailing party shall receive interest on any judgment from the time the action was commenced or a written settlement demand was made, or as to special damages from the time when special damages were incurred, if later, until the time of verdict or report only if the amount of its offer is closer to the judgment than the amount of the opposing party's offer. If the amount of the losing party's offer was closer to the judgment than the prevailing party's offer, the prevailing party shall receive interest only on the amount of the settlement offer or the judgment, whichever is less, and only from the time the action was commenced or a written settlement demand was made, or as to special damages from when the special damages were incurred, if later, until the time the settlement offer was made. Subsequent offers and counteroffers supersede the legal effect of earlier offers and counteroffers. For the purposes of clause (3), the amount of settlement offer must be allocated between past and future damages in the same proportion as determined by the trier of fact. Except as otherwise provided by contract or allowed by law, preverdict or prereport interest shall not be awarded on the following: (1) judgments, awards, or benefits in workers' compensation cases, but not including third-party actions; (2) judgments, decrees, or orders in dissolution, annulment, or legal separation actions; (3)judgments for future damages; (4)(3) punitive damages, fines, or other damages that are noncompensatory in nature; (5)(4) judgments not in excess of the amount specified in section 487.30; and (6)(5) that portion of any verdict or report which is founded upon interest, or costs, disbursements, attorney fees, or other similar items added by the court. (c) The interest shall be computed as simple interest per annum. The rate of interest shall be based on the secondary market yield of one year United States treasury bills, calculated on a bank discount basis as provided in this section. On or before the 20th day of December of each year the state court administrator shall determine the rate from the secondary market yield on one year United States treasury bills for the most recent calendar month, reported on a monthly basis in the latest statistical release of the board of governors of the federal reserve system. This yield, rounded to the nearest one percent, shall be the annual interest rate during the succeeding calendar year. The state court administrator shall communicate the interest rates to the court administrators and sheriffs for use in computing the interest on verdicts. When a judgment creditor, or the judgment creditor's attorney or agent, has received a payment after entry of judgment, whether the payment is made voluntarily by or on behalf of the judgment debtor, or is collected by legal process other than execution levy where a proper return has been filed with the court administrator, the judgment creditor, or the judgment creditor's attorney, before applying to the court administrator for an execution shall file with the court administrator an affidavit of partial satisfaction. The affidavit must state the dates and amounts of payments made upon the judgment after the most recent affidavit of partial satisfaction filed, if any; the part of each payment that is applied to taxable disbursements and to accrued interest and to the unpaid principal balance of the judgment; and the accrued, but the unpaid interest owing, if any, after application of each payment. Presented to the governor May 29, 1991 Signed by the governor June 1, 1991, 3:29 p.m.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes