Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
CHAPTER 359-S.F.No. 2858
An act relating to human services and corrections;
transfer to correctional facility; requiring a report;
amending Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 253B.185,
subdivision 2.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 253B.185,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. [TRANSFER TO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.] (a) If a
person has been committed under this section and later is
committed to the custody of the commissioner of corrections for
any reason, including but not limited to, being sentenced for a
crime or revocation of the person's supervised release or
conditional release under section 244.05, 609.108, subdivision
6, or 609.109, subdivision 7, the person may shall be
transferred from a hospital to another a facility designated by
the commissioner of corrections as without regard to the
procedures provided in section 253B.18;. except that the
special review board and the commissioner of human services may
consider the following factors in lieu of the factors listed in
section 253B.18, subdivision 6, to determine whether a transfer
to the commissioner of corrections is appropriate:
(1) the person's unamenability to treatment;
(2) the person's unwillingness or failure to follow
treatment recommendations;
(3) the person's lack of progress in treatment at the
public or private hospital;
(4) the danger posed by the person to other patients or
staff at the public or private hospital; and
(5) the degree of security necessary to protect the public.
(b) If a person is committed under this section after a
commitment to the commissioner of corrections, the person shall
first serve the sentence in a facility designated by the
commissioner of corrections. After the person has served the
sentence, the person shall be transferred to a regional center
treatment program designated by the commissioner of human
services.
Sec. 2. [SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT REPORT.]
Subdivision 1. [REPORT REQUIRED.] By December 15, 2000,
the commissioner of corrections, in consultation with the
commissioner of human services, the attorney general, the chief
justice of the supreme court, and the sentencing guidelines
commission, shall report to the chairs and ranking minority
members of the legislative committees and divisions having
jurisdiction over criminal justice policy and funding as
required by this section. Recommendations requiring legislative
action must include draft language and preliminary fiscal notes.
Subd. 2. [SEX OFFENDER POLICY AND MANAGEMENT
OVERSIGHT.] The report must include a plan for the establishment
of a sex offender policy and management oversight group to
monitor, review, and evaluate all aspects of the state's system
of responding to sexual offenses; identify system problems and
develop solutions; provide research and analysis for state and
local policymakers and criminal justice and corrections
agencies; and recommend policies and best practices that will
reduce sexual victimization and improve public safety in the
most cost-effective manner possible.
The commissioner of corrections shall explore alternative
models for the oversight group and recommend a structure that
will provide for systemwide collaboration; inclusion of experts
in the assessment, sentencing, management, and treatment of sex
offenders; adequate staff resources to accomplish long-range
oversight of a complex system; and effective support for policy
decisions.
Subd. 3. [CORRECTIONS AND HUMAN SERVICES COLLABORATIVE
WORK GROUP.] The report must include the results and future work
plan of the joint department of corrections and human services
collaborative work group.
Subd. 4. [INFORMATION ABOUT CIVILLY COMMITTED SEX
OFFENDERS.] The report must include an analysis of the cases of:
(1) the individuals currently civilly committed under Minnesota
Statutes, section 253B.185, as persons with sexual psychopathic
personalities or sexually dangerous persons; and (2) those
individuals referred by the department of corrections to county
attorneys for possible civil commitment, but who were not
committed. The analysis must include:
(i) the criminal sentences received by the individuals in
both groups and to the extent possible, why individuals did not
receive criminal sentences under Minnesota Statutes, sections
609.108 (mandatory increased sentences for certain patterned and
predatory sex offenders) and 609.109 (presumptive and mandatory
sentences for repeat sex offenders);
(ii) factors accounting for whether persons referred by the
department of corrections were or were not civilly committed;
and
(iii) the supervision options being used for those
individuals referred but not committed and, if possible, their
outcomes, including recidivism.
Subd. 5. [SEX OFFENDER SENTENCING PRACTICES.] The report
must include an analysis by the sentencing guidelines commission
of sex offender sentencing practices over the last decade;
implementation of sentencing authority and sentencing mandates
under Minnesota Statutes, sections 609.108 and 609.109,
including, to the extent possible, the factors involved in cases
in which these laws could have been but were not applied; and
recommendations, if any, to improve implementation of these laws.
Sec. 3. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]
Sections 1 and 2 are effective the day after final
enactment.
Presented to the governor April 7, 2000
Signed by the governor April 11, 2000, 10:32 a.m.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes