Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
CHAPTER 341-H.F.No. 3297
An act relating to the environment; clarifying the
liability of contractors performing certain response
and development actions under MERLA; clarifying time
for filing an action under MERLA; requiring public
notice of proposed response actions; requiring a
study; amending Minnesota Statutes 1996, sections
115B.03, by adding a subdivision; 115B.11; and
115B.17, by adding a subdivision.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 115B.03, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 10. [CONTRACTORS.] (a) For the purposes of this
subdivision, "contractor" means a person who is not otherwise
responsible for a release or threatened release of a hazardous
substance, or a pollutant or contaminant, and who, under
contract with another person:
(1) performs response actions, including investigative,
removal, or remedial actions to address the release or
threatened release pursuant to a plan approved by the
commissioner; or
(2) performs development actions at the site of the release
or threatened release, such as site preparation, engineering,
construction, and similar actions with respect to which the
commissioner approves a contingency plan or other conditions
which the commissioner deems necessary to protect public health
or welfare or the environment.
(b) A contractor is not a responsible person for a release
or threatened release solely as the result of performing
response actions to address that release or threatened release
if the contractor performs the response actions in accordance
with a plan approved by the commissioner.
(c) A contractor who performs development actions, such as
site preparation, engineering, construction, or similar actions,
at the site of a release or threatened release is not
responsible for the release or threatened release solely as a
result of performing the development actions if the contractor
complies with a contingency plan or other conditions approved by
the commissioner. The contractor must obtain approval from the
commissioner for the contingency plan or other conditions:
(1) for a site with a known release or threatened release,
before the contractor commences the development actions; or
(2) for a site with a release or threatened release
discovered during the contractor's performance of the
development actions, before the contractor performs further
development actions at the site after discovery of the release
or threatened release.
(d) This subdivision shall not apply to a contractor who
causes or contributes to a release or threatened release by an
act or omission that is negligent, grossly negligent, or that
constitutes intentional misconduct.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 115B.11, is
amended to read:
115B.11 [STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.]
Subdivision 1. [CONSTRUCTION.] For the purposes of this
section, "construction" means actions taken after the selection
of remedial action such as excavation, building of structures,
installation of equipment or fixtures, and other physical
actions to respond to a release or threatened release.
Subd. 2. [ACTION FOR RECOVERY OF COSTS.] (a) An action for
recovery of response costs under section 115B.04, including
recovery of costs and expenses under section 115B.17,
subdivision 6, may be commenced any time after costs and
expenses have been incurred but must be commenced no later than
six years after initiation of physical on-site construction of a
response action.
(b) A party prevailing in an action commenced within the
time required under paragraph (a) shall be entitled to a
declaratory judgment of liability for all future reasonable and
necessary costs incurred by that party to respond to the release
or threatened release, including costs and expenses under
section 115B.17, subdivision 6.
Subd. 3. [ACTION FOR DAMAGES.] No person may
recover damages pursuant to sections 115B.01 to 115B.15 unless
the action is commenced within six years from the date when the
cause of action accrues. In determining when the cause of
action accrues for an action to recover damages for death,
personal injury or disease, the court shall consider factors
including the following:
(a) When the plaintiff discovered the injury or loss;
(b) Whether a personal injury or disease had sufficiently
manifested itself; and
(c) When the plaintiff discovered, or using due diligence
should have discovered, a causal connection between the injury,
disease, or loss and the release of a hazardous substance.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 115B.17, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2b. [PUBLIC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RESPONSE
ACTIONS.] Before selecting a remedial action to respond to a
release or threatened release listed pursuant to subdivision 13,
the commissioner shall give written notice of the proposed
remedial action to the public by publication of a notice in a
newspaper of general circulation in the affected area, and
provide an opportunity for submission of comments on the
proposed remedial action. The notice shall also be given by
certified mail to all persons known to the commissioner at the
time of the notice who the commissioner has reason to believe
are responsible for the release or threatened release, including
all persons who have previously received a request for response
action under subdivision 1 with respect to the release or
threatened release.
Sec. 4. [STUDY REGARDING EFFECT OF CHANGES TO STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS.]
The commissioner of the pollution control agency, in
consultation with other parties who may have cost recovery
claims, or their representatives, shall study the implications
of the amendments to the statute of limitations in section 2 on
both the state and any other parties. By January 15, 1999, the
commissioner shall report to the legislature regarding the
following:
(1) the number of sites where the state has incurred
response costs;
(2) the number of potential and commenced cost recovery
actions brought by the state or other parties; and
(3) estimated fiscal impact of the legislative change on
the state and other parties.
Sec. 5. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]
Sections 1 to 3 are effective the day following final
enactment. Section 1 applies to response actions and
development actions performed after that date. Section 2
applies to actions for recovery of costs commenced on or after
that date. Response costs incurred before the effective date of
section 2 are recoverable in an action commenced on or after the
effective date of section 2 only if physical on-site
construction of the response action was initiated not more than
six years before the cost recovery action is commenced.
Notwithstanding any provision in this act to the contrary, the
running of the statute of limitations imposed by section 2 with
respect to cost recovery actions is suspended until July 1,
1999. Section 2 shall not apply to any litigation pending in
court on the date of enactment if the statute of limitations
under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 115B, has been contested in
the litigation. Section 2 shall not be offered by any party as
evidence of the intent, meaning, or application of the statute
of limitations under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 115B.
Presented to the governor March 27, 1998
Signed by the governor March 31, 1998, 10:48 a.m.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes