Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
CHAPTER 303-S.F.No. 1583
An act relating to state government; setting state
policy for regulatory rules and programs of agencies;
regulating obsolete, unnecessary, or duplicative
rules; providing notice of rulemaking action to the
legislature; requiring a study; amending Minnesota
Statutes 1997 Supplement, sections 14.05, subdivision
5; and 14.131; proposing coding for new law in
Minnesota Statutes, chapter 14.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. [14.002] [STATE REGULATORY POLICY.]
The legislature recognizes the important and sensitive role
for administrative rules in implementing policies and programs
created by the legislature. However, the legislature finds that
some regulatory rules and programs have become overly
prescriptive and inflexible, thereby increasing costs to the
state, local governments, and the regulated community and
decreasing the effectiveness of the regulatory program.
Therefore, whenever feasible, state agencies must develop rules
and regulatory programs that emphasize superior achievement in
meeting the agency's regulatory objectives and maximum
flexibility for the regulated party and the agency in meeting
those goals.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, section 14.05,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. [REVIEW AND REPEAL OF RULES.] By December 1 of
each year, an agency shall must submit a list of all the rules
of the agency to the governor, the legislative coordinating
commission, the policy and funding committees and divisions with
jurisdiction over the agency, and the revisor of statutes. The,
a list must identify of any rules or portions of rules that are
obsolete and should be repealed, unnecessary, or duplicative of
other state or federal statutes or rules. The list must also
include an explanation of why the rule or portion of the rule is
obsolete and the agency's, unnecessary, or duplicative of other
state or federal statutes or rules. By December 1, the agency
must either report a timetable for repeal of the rule or portion
of the rule, or must develop a bill for submission to the
appropriate policy committee to repeal the obsolete,
unnecessary, or duplicative rule. Such a bill must include
proposed authorization to use the expedited procedures of
section 14.389 to repeal or amend the obsolete, unnecessary, or
duplicative rule. A report submitted under this subdivision
must be signed by the person in the agency who is responsible
for identifying and initiating repeal of obsolete rules. The
report also must identify the status of any rules identified in
the prior year's report as obsolete, unnecessary, or
duplicative. If none of an agency's rules are obsolete,
unnecessary, or duplicative, an agency's December 1 report must
state that conclusion.
Sec. 3. [14.116] [NOTICE TO LEGISLATURE.]
When an agency mails notice of intent to adopt rules under
section 14.14 or 14.22, the agency must make reasonable efforts
to send a copy of the same notice and a copy of the statement of
need and reasonableness to the following:
(1) all people who are still legislators and who were main
authors, or supporting authors, of the law granting the agency
the statutory authority the agency relies upon as authority to
adopt the proposed rule; and
(2) the chairs of the legislative policy and budget
committees with jurisdiction over the subject matter of the
proposed rules.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1997 Supplement, section
14.131, is amended to read:
14.131 [STATEMENT OF NEED AND REASONABLENESS.]
Before the agency orders the publication of a rulemaking
notice required by section 14.14, subdivision 1a, the agency
shall must prepare, review, and make available for public review
a statement of the need for and reasonableness of the rule. The
statement of need and reasonableness must be prepared under
rules adopted by the chief administrative law judge and must
include the following to the extent the agency, through
reasonable effort, can ascertain this information:
(1) a description of the classes of persons who probably
will be affected by the proposed rule, including classes that
will bear the costs of the proposed rule and classes that will
benefit from the proposed rule;
(2) the probable costs to the agency and to any other
agency of the implementation and enforcement of the proposed
rule and any anticipated effect on state revenues;
(3) a determination of whether there are less costly
methods or less intrusive methods for achieving the purpose of
the proposed rule;
(4) a description of any alternative methods for achieving
the purpose of the proposed rule that were seriously considered
by the agency and the reasons why they were rejected in favor of
the proposed rule;
(5) the probable costs of complying with the proposed rule;
and
(6) an assessment of any differences between the proposed
rule and existing federal regulations and a specific analysis of
the need for and reasonableness of each difference.
For rules setting, adjusting, or establishing regulatory,
licensure, or other charges for goods and services, the
statement of need and reasonableness must include the comments
and recommendations of the commissioner of finance and must
address any fiscal and policy concerns raised during the review
process, as required by section 16A.1285.
The statement must describe how the agency, in developing
the rules, considered and implemented the legislative policy
supporting performance-based regulatory systems set forth in
section 14.002.
The statement must also describe the agency's efforts to
provide additional notification to persons or classes of persons
who may be affected by the proposed rule or must explain why
these efforts were not made.
The agency shall must send a copy of the statement of need
and reasonableness to the legislative reference library when it
becomes available for public review.
Sec. 5. [STUDY.]
The legislative coordinating commission, or a subcommittee
appointed by the commission, must report to the legislature by
January 15, 1999, on broad statutory delegations of rulemaking
authority to state agencies. The report must include proposed
legislation to repeal or modify delegations of authority which
the commission believes to be overly broad. The commission must
notify appropriate policy committees of these overly broad
delegations, and must encourage the committees to propose
legislation with more specific delegations of authority. In its
study, the commission must consider, among other delegation, the
authority granted in the following sections of Minnesota
Statutes: 16B.04, subdivision 1; 41A.04, subdivision 4; 45.023;
84.03; 103B.101, subdivision 7; 115B.28, subdivision 1;
116J.035, subdivision 2; 147.01, subdivision 3; 148.05; 148.08,
subdivision 3; 148.191, subdivision 2; 148.53; 148B.20,
subdivision 1; 148B.31; 150A.04, subdivision 5; 151.06,
subdivision 1; 153.02; 154.24; 156.01, subdivision 3; 175.171;
179A.04, subdivision 3; 182.657; 216A.07, subdivision 5;
216B.08; 216C.02, subdivision 3; 223.19; 239.06; 256.975,
subdivision 2; 268.0122, subdivision 5; 268.021; 270.06;
299J.04, subdivision 1; 299K.03, subdivision 5; 326.06; 326.18;
326.241, subdivision 2; 352.03, subdivision 4; 363.05,
subdivision 1; 401.03; 462A.06; 611A.33; and 626.843,
subdivision 1.
Presented to the governor March 17, 1998
Signed by the governor March 18, 1998, 4:20 p.m.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes