Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
CHAPTER 128-S.F.No. 1807
An act relating to workers' compensation; changing
certain reporting deadlines; modifying certain
workers' compensation procedures; adding state
correctional officers to the presumption of
occupational disease; amending Minnesota Statutes
1996, sections 79.55, subdivisions 9 and 10; 176.011,
subdivision 15; and 176.191, subdivisions 1 and 5.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 79.55,
subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. [ANALYSIS BY RATE OVERSIGHT COMMISSION.] Not
later than November December 1 of each year, the rate oversight
commission may submit to the commissioner a report concerning
the completeness of the filing and compliance of the filing with
the standards for excessiveness, inadequacy, and unfair
discrimination set forth in this chapter.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 79.55,
subdivision 10, is amended to read:
Subd. 10. [DUTIES OF COMMISSIONER.] The commissioner shall
issue a report by January March 1 of each year, comparing the
average rates charged by workers' compensation insurers in the
state to the pure premium base rates filed by the association,
as reviewed by the rate oversight commission. The rate
oversight commission shall review the commissioner's report and
if the experience indicates that rates have not reasonably
reflected changes in pure premiums, the rate oversight
commission shall recommend to the legislature appropriate
legislative changes to this chapter.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 176.011,
subdivision 15, is amended to read:
Subd. 15. [OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE.] (a) "Occupational
disease" means a disease arising out of and in the course of
employment peculiar to the occupation in which the employee is
engaged and due to causes in excess of the hazards ordinary of
employment and shall include undulant fever. Ordinary diseases
of life to which the general public is equally exposed outside
of employment are not compensable, except where the diseases
follow as an incident of an occupational disease, or where the
exposure peculiar to the occupation makes the disease an
occupational disease hazard. A disease arises out of the
employment only if there be a direct causal connection between
the conditions under which the work is performed and if the
occupational disease follows as a natural incident of the work
as a result of the exposure occasioned by the nature of the
employment. An employer is not liable for compensation for any
occupational disease which cannot be traced to the employment as
a direct and proximate cause and is not recognized as a hazard
characteristic of and peculiar to the trade, occupation,
process, or employment or which results from a hazard to which
the worker would have been equally exposed outside of the
employment.
(b) If immediately preceding the date of disablement or
death, an employee was employed on active duty with an organized
fire or police department of any municipality, as a member of
the Minnesota state patrol, conservation officer service, state
crime bureau, as a forest officer by the department of natural
resources, state correctional officer, or sheriff or full-time
deputy sheriff of any county, and the disease is that of
myocarditis, coronary sclerosis, pneumonia or its sequel, and at
the time of employment such employee was given a thorough
physical examination by a licensed doctor of medicine, and a
written report thereof has been made and filed with such
organized fire or police department, with the Minnesota state
patrol, conservation officer service, state crime bureau,
department of natural resources, department of corrections, or
sheriff's department of any county, which examination and report
negatived any evidence of myocarditis, coronary sclerosis,
pneumonia or its sequel, the disease is presumptively an
occupational disease and shall be presumed to have been due to
the nature of employment. If immediately preceding the date of
disablement or death, any individual who by nature of their
position provides emergency medical care, or an employee who was
employed as a licensed police officer under section 626.84,
subdivision 1; firefighter; paramedic; state correctional
officer; emergency medical technician; or licensed nurse
providing emergency medical care; and who contracts an
infectious or communicable disease to which the employee was
exposed in the course of employment outside of a hospital, then
the disease is presumptively an occupational disease and shall
be presumed to have been due to the nature of employment and the
presumption may be rebutted by substantial factors brought by
the employer or insurer.
(c) A firefighter on active duty with an organized fire
department who is unable to perform duties in the department by
reason of a disabling cancer of a type caused by exposure to
heat, radiation, or a known or suspected carcinogen, as defined
by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and the
carcinogen is reasonably linked to the disabling cancer, is
presumed to have an occupational disease under paragraph (a).
If a firefighter who enters the service after August 1, 1988, is
examined by a physician prior to being hired and the examination
discloses the existence of a cancer of a type described in this
paragraph, the firefighter is not entitled to the presumption
unless a subsequent medical determination is made that the
firefighter no longer has the cancer.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 176.191,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. [ORDER; EMPLOYER, INSURER, OR SPECIAL
COMPENSATION FUND PAYMENT.] Where compensation benefits are
payable under this chapter, and a dispute exists between two or
more employers or two or more insurers or the special
compensation fund as to which is liable for payment, the
commissioner, compensation judge, or court of appeals upon
appeal shall direct that one or more of the employers or
insurers or the special compensation fund make payment of the
benefits pending a determination of which has liability. The
special compensation fund may be ordered to make payment only if
it has been made a party to the claim because the petitioner has
alleged that one or more of the employers is uninsured for
workers' compensation under section 176.183. A temporary order
may be issued under this subdivision whether or not the
employers, insurers, or special compensation fund agree to pay
under the order., and whether or not they agree that benefits
are payable under this chapter. A temporary order shall be
issued if the commissioner or compensation judge determines
based on evidence submitted by the employee that benefits are
payable under this chapter and if two or more employers,
insurers, or the special compensation fund deny liability based
on an assertion that another employer, insurer, or the special
compensation fund is liable. A temporary order shall not be
withheld where the denials of liability are frivolous as defined
in section 176.225, subdivision 1, or nonspecific as defined in
section 176.84, subdivision 1.
If the parties do not agree to a temporary order, the
commissioner or compensation judge shall summarily hear and
determine the issues and issue an order without the need for a
formal evidentiary hearing. At any time after a temporary order
is issued, the paying party may request to discontinue payment
of benefits based on new evidence that benefits are not payable
under this chapter by following the procedures of section
176.238 or 176.239.
At any time after a temporary order is issued, the paying
party may also petition for a formal hearing before a
compensation judge for a determination of liability among the
parties. If the petition is filed within one year after a
temporary order was issued, the hearing shall be held within 45
days after the petition was filed. Payments under a temporary
order shall continue pending the determination of the
compensation judge. The compensation judge shall have
jurisdiction to resolve all issues properly raised, including
equitable apportionment. The procedures and monetary thresholds
contained in section 176.191, subdivisions 1a and 5 shall not
apply to these proceedings. This subdivision applies to all
dates of injury.
When liability has been determined, the party held liable
for the benefits shall be ordered to reimburse any other party
for payments which the latter has made, including interest at
the rate of 12 percent a year. The claimant shall also be
awarded a reasonable attorney fee, to be paid by the party held
liable for the benefits.
An order directing payment of benefits pending a
determination of liability may not be used as evidence before a
compensation judge, the workers' compensation court of appeals,
or court in which the dispute is pending.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1996, section 176.191,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. [ARBITRATION.] Where a dispute exists between an
employer, insurer, the special compensation fund, or the
workers' compensation reinsurance association, regarding
apportionment of liability for benefits payable under this
chapter, and the requesting party has expended over $10,000 in
medical or 52 weeks worth of indemnity benefits and made the
request within one year thereafter, a party may require
submission of the dispute as to apportionment of liability among
employers and insurers to binding arbitration. However, these
monetary thresholds shall not apply in any case where the
employers and insurers agree to submit the apportionment dispute
to arbitration. The decision of the arbitrator shall be
conclusive on the issue of apportionment among employers and
insurers. Consent of the employee is not required for
submission of a dispute to arbitration pursuant to this section
and the employee is not bound by the results of the
arbitration. An arbitration award shall not be admissible in
any other proceeding under this chapter. Notice of the
proceeding shall be given to the employee.
The employee, or any person with material information to
the facts to be arbitrated, shall attend the arbitration
proceeding if any party to the proceeding deems it necessary.
Nothing said by an employee in connection with any arbitration
proceeding may be used against the employee in any other
proceeding under this chapter. Reasonable expenses of meals,
lost wages, and travel of the employee or witnesses in attending
shall be reimbursed on a pro rata basis. Arbitration costs
shall be paid by the parties, except the employee, on a pro rata
basis.
Sec. 6. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]
Section 3 is effective the day following final enactment
and applies to injuries on or after that date. Section 4 is
effective the day following final enactment.
Presented to the governor May 8, 1997
Signed by the governor May 9, 1997, 8:17 a.m.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes