Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
KEY: stricken = old language to be removed
underscored = new language to be added
CHAPTER 402-H.F.No. 2375
An act relating to local improvements; requiring a
report to show the need and cost-effectiveness of
local improvements; prohibiting fees for preparing
certain reports from being based primarily on the
estimated cost of improvement; amending Minnesota
Statutes 1994, section 429.031, subdivision 1.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1994, section 429.031,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. [PREPARATION OF PLANS, NOTICE OF HEARING.]
Before the municipality awards a contract for an improvement or
orders it made by day labor, or before the municipality shall
have the power to may assess any portion of the cost of an
improvement to be made under a cooperative agreement with the
state or another political subdivision for sharing the cost of
making such the improvement, the council shall hold a public
hearing on the proposed improvement following two publications
in the newspaper of a notice stating the time and place of the
hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated
cost, and the area proposed to be assessed. The two
publications shall must be a week apart, and the hearing shall
must be at least three days after the last second publication.
Not less than 10 days before the hearing, notice thereof shall
of the hearing must also be mailed to the owner of each parcel
within the area proposed to be assessed, but failure to give
mailed notice or any defects in the notice shall does not
invalidate the proceedings. For the purpose of giving mailed
notice, owners shall be are those shown to be such as owners on
the records of the county auditor or, in any county where tax
statements are mailed by the county treasurer, on the records of
the county treasurer; but other appropriate records may be used
for this purpose. However, as to For properties which that are
tax exempt or subject to taxation on a gross earnings basis and
are not listed on the records of the county auditor or the
county treasurer, the owners thereof shall may be ascertained by
any practicable means, and mailed notice shall must be given
them as herein provided in this subdivision. Prior to Before
the adoption of such a resolution ordering the improvement, the
council shall secure from the city engineer or some other
competent person of its selection a report advising it in a
preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement
is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and as to whether it
should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other
improvement. and The report must also include the estimated cost
of the improvement as recommended; but. No error or omission in
such the report shall invalidate invalidates the proceeding
unless it materially prejudices the interests of an owner. If
the report is not prepared by an employee of a municipality, the
compensation for preparing the report under this subdivision
must be based on the following factors:
(1) the time and labor required;
(2) the experience and knowledge of the preparer;
(3) the complexity and novelty of the problems involved;
and
(4) the extent of the responsibilities assumed.
The compensation must not be based primarily on a
percentage of the estimated cost of the improvement.
The council may also take such other steps prior to the
hearing, including, among other things, the preparation of plans
and specifications and the advertisement for bids thereon, as
that will in its judgment provide helpful information in
determining the desirability and feasibility of the
improvement. The hearing may be adjourned from time to time,
and a resolution ordering the improvement may be adopted at any
time within six months after the date of the hearing by vote of
a majority of all members of the council when the improvement
has been petitioned for by the owners of not less than 35
percent in frontage of the real property abutting on the streets
named in the petition as the location of the improvement. When
there has been no such petition, the resolution may be adopted
only by vote of four-fifths of all members of the council;
provided that if the mayor of the municipality is a member of
the council but has no vote or votes only in case of a tie, the
mayor shall is not be deemed to be a member for the purpose of
determining such a four-fifths majority vote. The resolution
ordering the improvement may reduce, but not increase, the
extent of the improvement as stated in the notice of hearing.
Presented to the governor March 29, 1996
Signed by the governor April 2, 1996, 10:18 a.m.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes