Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
Laws of Minnesota 1987
CHAPTER 207-S.F.No. 353
An act relating to metropolitan water management;
providing assessment and notice procedures; providing
for county ground water plans; amending Minnesota
Statutes 1986, sections 112.60, by adding
subdivisions; 112.64, by adding a subdivision;
473.875; 473.876, by adding subdivisions; and 473.878,
subdivisions 3, 5, 6, 7, and 9; proposing coding for
new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 473.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 112.60, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1a. [ASSESSMENT NOTICE FOR METROPOLITAN WATERSHEDS.]
For a watershed district entirely within the metropolitan area,
the auditor must mail an assessment notice to property owners
and corporations benefited and damaged before the assessment is
made in subdivision 1. The assessment notice must include:
(1) the amount to be specially assessed against the
property;
(2) the right of the property owner to prepay the entire
assessment and to whom prepayment must be made;
(3) whether partial prepayment of the assessment is
authorized;
(4) the time within which prepayment may be made without
interest being charged; and
(5) the rate of interest to be charged if the assessment is
not prepaid within the required time period.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 112.60, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 5. [PREPAYMENT FOR METROPOLITAN WATERSHED
DISTRICTS.] (a) For a watershed district entirely within the
metropolitan area, a property owner or corporation may prepay
the entire assessment at any time before the first installment
of the assessment is entered on the tax lists for the year with
the interest that has accrued to the date of payment, except
that interest may not be charged on an assessment that is
prepaid within 30 days after the assessment notice is mailed.
(b) After the first installment of an assessment is entered
on the tax list, a property owner or corporation may prepay the
entire assessment remaining due before November 15 with interest
accrued to December 31 of the year in which the prepayment is
made.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 112.64, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 3a. [NOTICE AND PREPAYMENT FOR METROPOLITAN
WATERSHEDS.] For a watershed district entirely within the
metropolitan area, the auditor must mail an assessment notice to
the owners of affected property as provided in section 112.60,
subdivision 1a, before the assessment is levied. The assessment
may be prepaid as provided in section 112.60, subdivision 5.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.875, is
amended to read:
473.875 [SURFACE METROPOLITAN WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
PROGRAMS; PURPOSES.]
The purpose of the surface water management programs
required by sections 473.875 to 473.883 is to protect, preserve
and use natural surface and ground water storage and retention
systems in order to (a) reduce to the greatest practical extent
the public capital expenditures necessary to control excessive
volumes and rates of runoff, (b) protect and improve surface and
ground water quality, (c) prevent flooding and erosion from
surface flows, (d) promote ground water recharge, (e) protect
and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational
facilities, and (f) secure the other benefits associated with
the proper management of surface and ground water.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.876, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a. [GROUND WATER PLAN.] "Ground water plan" means a
county plan adopted under section 12.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.876, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2b. [GROUND WATER SYSTEM.] "Ground water system"
means one of the 14 principal aquifers of the state as defined
by the United States Geological Survey in the Water-Resources
Investigations 81-51, entitled "Designation of Principal Water
Supply Aquifers in Minnesota" (August 1981), and its revisions.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.878,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. [GENERAL STANDARDS.] (a) The watershed management
plan shall extend through the year 1990 or any year thereafter
which is evenly divisible by five.
(b) The plan must be updated before the expiration of the
period covered by the plan. The plan must be reviewed for
consistency with an adopted county ground water plan, and
revised as necessary, whenever the watershed plan undergoes
substantial revision or updating. In counties that adopt or
amend ground water plans within five years following the
effective date of section 12, watershed plans must be reviewed
for consistency with the county ground water plan, and revised
as necessary, not later than six years following the effective
date of section 12. In counties that adopt or amend ground
water plans after five years following the effective date of
section 12, watershed plans must be reviewed for consistency
with the county ground water plan, and revised as necessary, not
later than one year following the adoption or amendment of the
ground water plan. Upon the request of a watershed management
organization, the county shall provide a written statement
that: (1) identifies any substantial inconsistencies between
the watershed plan and the ground water plan and any substantial
adverse effects of the watershed plan on the ground water plan,
and (2) evaluates, estimates the cost of, and recommends
alternatives for amending the watershed plan to rectify any
substantial inconsistencies and adverse effects.
(c) The plan shall contain the elements required by
subdivision 4. Each element shall be set out in the degree of
detail and prescription necessary to accomplish the purposes of
sections 473.875 to 473.883, considering the character of
existing and anticipated physical and hydrogeologic conditions,
land use, and development and the severity of existing and
anticipated water management problems in the watershed.
(d) The plan shall be prepared and submitted for review
under subdivision 5 not later than December 31, 1986.
(e) Existing plans of a watershed management organization
shall remain in force and effect until amended or superseded by
plans adopted under sections 473.875 to 473.883. Existing or
amended plans of a watershed management organization which meet
the requirements of sections 473.875 to 473.883 may be submitted
for review under subdivision 5.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.878,
subdivision 5, is amended to read:
Subd. 5. [LOCAL REVIEW.] (a) Upon completion of the plan
but before final adoption by the organization, the organization
shall submit the plan for review and comment to all counties,
soil and water conservation districts, towns, and statutory and
home rule charter cities having territory within the watershed.
Any local government unit which expects that substantial
amendment of its local comprehensive plan will be necessary in
order to bring local water management into conformance with the
watershed plan shall describe as specifically as possible,
within its comments, the amendments to the local plan which it
expects will be necessary. If the county has a ground water
plan, the county shall review and comment on the consistency of
the watershed plan with the county ground water plan.
Differences among local governmental agencies regarding the plan
must be mediated.
(b) Sixty days after the submission to local government
units for comment, the organization shall submit the plan, any
comments received, and any appropriate amendments to the plan,
to the board of the county or counties having territory within
the watershed. The county shall approve or disapprove projects
in the capital improvement program which may require the
provision of county funds pursuant to section 112.60,
subdivision 2, or 473.883. The county shall have 60 days to
complete its review of the capital improvement program. If the
county fails to complete its review within the prescribed
period, unless an extension is agreed to by the organization the
program shall be deemed approved. If the watershed extends into
more than one county and one or more counties disapprove of all
or part of a capital improvement program while the other county
or counties approve, the program shall be submitted to the water
resources board for review pursuant to subdivision 7.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.878,
subdivision 6, is amended to read:
Subd. 6. [REVIEW BY METROPOLITAN COUNCIL.] After
completion of the review under subdivision 5, the plan and all
comments received shall be submitted to the metropolitan council
for review. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in
sections 112.46 and 473.165, the council shall review the plan
in the same manner and with the same authority and effect as
provided for the council's review of the comprehensive plans of
local government units under section 473.175. The council shall
comment on the apparent conformity with metropolitan system
plans of any anticipated amendments to local comprehensive
plans. The council may mediate and attempt to resolve
differences among local governmental agencies regarding the plan.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.878,
subdivision 7, is amended to read:
Subd. 7. [REVIEW BY STATE AGENCIES.] After completion of
the review under subdivision 6, the plan and all comments
received shall be submitted to the commissioner commissioners of
natural resources and health and the director of the pollution
control agency for review and comment on the consistency of the
plan with state laws and rules relating to water and related
land resources, and to the water resources board for review
under section 112.46. Except as otherwise provided in this
subdivision, the water resources board shall review the plan as
provided in section 112.46. The board shall review the plan for
conformance with the requirements of chapter 112 and sections
473.875 to 473.883. The board shall not prescribe a plan, but
may disapprove all or parts of a plan which it determines is not
in conformance with the requirements of chapter 112 and sections
473.875 to 473.883. If the capital improvement program is the
subject of a dispute between counties, the water resources board
shall make a final decision on the issue. The decision shall be
binding on the organization and the counties involved.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.878,
subdivision 9, is amended to read:
Subd. 9. [AMENDMENTS.] To the extent and in the manner
required by the adopted plan, all amendments to the adopted plan
shall be submitted to the towns, cities, county, and other
agencies for review in accordance with the provisions of
subdivisions 5, 6, and 7. Amendments necessary to revise the
plan to be consistent with county ground water plan, as required
by subdivision 3, must be submitted for review in accordance
with subdivisions 5, 6, and 7.
Sec. 12. [473.8785] [GROUND WATER PLANS.]
Subdivision 1. [AUTHORITY.] A metropolitan county may
prepare and adopt ground water plans in accordance with this
section.
Subd. 2. [RESPONSIBLE UNITS.] The county may prepare and
adopt the plan or, upon request of a soil and water conservation
district, the county may delegate to the soil and water
conservation district the preparation and adoption of all or
part of a plan and the performance of other county
responsibilities regarding the plan under this section and
section 473.878.
Subd. 3. [LOCAL COORDINATION.] To assure the coordination
of efforts of all units of government during the preparation and
implementation of watershed and ground water plans, the county
shall conduct meetings with local units of government and
watershed management organizations, and may enter into
agreements with local units of government and watershed
management organizations establishing the responsibilities
during the preparation and implementation of the water plans.
Subd. 4. [ASSISTANCE; ADVISORY COMMITTEE.] The county may
contract with the Minnesota geological survey, the United States
geological survey, a soil and water conservation district, or
other public or private agencies or persons for services in
performing the county's responsibilities regarding the plan
under this section and section 473.878. Counties may enter into
agreements with other counties or local units of government
under section 471.59 for the performance of these
responsibilities. To assist in the development of the ground
water plan, the county shall seek the advice of the Minnesota
geological survey, the departments of health and natural
resources, the pollution control agency, and other appropriate
local, state, and federal agencies, and shall name an advisory
committee of 15 members. The committee must include
representatives of various interests, including construction,
agriculture, hydrogeology, and well drilling. At least four
members of the committee must be from the public at large with
no direct pecuniary interest in any project involving ground
water protection. At least seven members must be appointed from
watershed management organizations, statutory and home rule
charter cities, and towns, and these local government
representatives must be geographically distributed so that at
least one is appointed from each county commissioner district.
The county shall consult the advisory committee on the
development, content, and implementation of the plan, including
the relationship of the ground water plan and existing watershed
and local water management plans, the effect of the ground water
plan on the other plans, and the allocation of costs and
governmental authority and responsibilities during
implementation.
Subd. 5. [GENERAL STANDARDS.] The ground water plan must
extend through the year 1995 or any year thereafter which is
evenly divisible by five. The plan must contain the elements
required by subdivision 6. Each element must be set out in the
degree of detail and prescription necessary to accomplish the
purposes of sections 473.875 to 473.883, considering the
character of existing and anticipated physical and hydrogeologic
conditions, land use, and development and the severity of
existing and anticipated ground water management problems in the
county. To the fullest extent possible in a manner consistent
with ground water protection, a county shall make maximum use of
existing and available data and studies in preparing the ground
water plan and incorporate into its ground water plan relevant
data from existing plans and studies and the relevant provisions
of existing plans adopted by watershed management organizations
having jurisdiction wholly or partly within the county.
Subd. 6. [CONTENTS.] A ground water plan must:
(1) cover the entire area within the county;
(2) describe existing and expected changes to the physical
environment, land use, and development in the county;
(3) summarize available information about the ground water
and related resources in the county, including existing and
potential distribution, availability, quality, and use;
(4) state the goals, objectives, scope, and priorities of
ground water protection in the county;
(5) contain standards, criteria, and guidelines for the
protection of ground water from pollution and for various types
of land uses in environmentally sensitive areas, critical areas,
or previously contaminated areas;
(6) describe relationships and possible conflicts between
the ground water plan and the plans of other counties, local
government units, and watershed management organizations in the
affected ground water system;
(7) set forth standards and guidelines for implementation
of the plan by watershed management organizations and local
units of government; and
(8) include a procedure for amending the ground water plan.
Subd. 7. [LOCAL REVIEW AND COMMENT.] Upon completion of
the ground water plan but before final adoption by the county,
the county shall submit the plan for review and comment to each
soil and water conservation district, town, statutory and home
rule charter city, and watershed management organization having
territory within the county. The county also shall submit the
plan to any other county or watershed management organization or
district in the affected ground water system that could affect
or be affected by implementation of the plan. Any political
subdivision or watershed management organization that expects
that substantial amendment of its plans would be necessary in
order to bring them into conformance with the county ground
water plan shall describe as specifically as possible, within
its comments, the amendments that it expects would be necessary
and the cost of amendment and implementation. Reviewing
entities have 60 days to review and comment. Differences among
local governmental agencies regarding the plan must be mediated.
Subd. 8. [REVIEW BY METROPOLITAN COUNCIL.] After
completion of the review under subdivision 7, the plan and all
comments received must be submitted to the metropolitan council
for review. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in
sections 112.46 and 473.165, the council shall review the plan
in the same manner and with the same authority and effect as
provided for the council's review of the comprehensive plans of
local government units under section 473.175. The council shall
comment on the apparent conformity with metropolitan system
plans of any anticipated amendments to watershed plans and local
comprehensive plans. The council shall summarize and evaluate
the cost of rectifying inconsistencies between the ground water
plan and watershed plans. If the council finds that significant
funding problems, needs, or inequities will result from the
ground water plan, the council shall report to the legislature
on the matter and on appropriate means of allocating and paying
costs. The council may mediate and attempt to resolve
differences among local governmental agencies regarding the plan.
Subd. 9. [REVIEW BY STATE AGENCIES.] After completion of
the review under subdivision 8, the plan and all comments
received must be submitted to the commissioners of natural
resources and health and the director of the pollution control
agency for review and comment on the consistency of the plan
with state laws and rules relating to water and related land
resources, and to the water resources board for review under
section 112.46. Except as otherwise provided in this
subdivision, the water resources board shall review the plan as
provided in section 112.46. The board shall review the plan for
conformance with the requirements of chapter 112 and sections
473.875 to 473.883. The board may not prescribe a plan, but may
disapprove all or parts of a plan which it determines is not in
conformance with the requirements of chapter 112 and sections
473.875 to 473.883.
Subd. 10. [ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION.] The county shall
adopt and implement its ground water plan within 120 days after
approval of the plan by the water resources board.
Subd. 11. [AMENDMENTS.] To the extent and in the manner
required by the adopted plan, all amendments to the adopted plan
must be submitted to the towns, cities, counties, and other
agencies for review in accordance with the provisions of
subdivisions 7 to 9.
Sec. 13. [APPLICATION.]
Sections 4 to 12 apply in the counties of Anoka, Carver,
Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington.
Approved May 26, 1987
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes