Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
Laws of Minnesota 1987
CHAPTER 52-S.F.No. 793
An act relating to commerce; consumer protection;
requiring the repair, refund, or replacement of new
motor vehicles under certain circumstances;
prescribing certain arbitration mechanisms for all
automobile manufacturers doing business and offering
express warranties on their vehicles sold in Minnesota;
amending Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 325F.665.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 325F.665, is
amended to read:
325F.665 [NEW MOTOR VEHICLE WARRANTIES; MANUFACTURER'S DUTY
TO REPAIR, REFUND, OR REPLACE.]
Subdivision 1. [DEFINITIONS.] For the purposes of this
section, the following terms have the meanings given them:
(a) "consumer" means the purchaser or lessee, other than
for purposes of resale or sublease, of a new motor vehicle used
for personal, family, or household purposes at least 40 percent
of the time, a person to whom the new motor vehicle is
transferred for the same purposes during the duration of an
express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle, and any other
person entitled by the terms of the warranty to enforce the
obligations of the warranty;
(b) "manufacturer" means a person engaged in the business
of manufacturing, assembling or distributing motor vehicles, who
will, under normal business conditions during the year,
manufacture, assemble or distribute to dealers at least ten new
motor vehicles;
(c) "manufacturer's express warranty" and "warranty" mean
the written warranty of the manufacturer of a new motor vehicle
of its condition and fitness for use, including any terms or
conditions precedent to the enforcement of obligations under
that warranty;
(d) "lease" means a contract in the form of a lease or
bailment for the use of personal property by a natural person
for a period of time exceeding four months, used for personal,
family, or household purposes at least 40 percent of the time,
whether or not the lessee has the option to purchase or
otherwise become the owner of the property at the expiration of
the lease;
(e) "motor vehicle" means (1) a passenger automobile as
defined in section 168.011, subdivision 7, including pickup
trucks and vans, and (2) the self-propelled motor vehicle
chassis or van portion of recreational equipment as defined in
section 168.011, subdivision 25, which is sold or leased to a
consumer in this state;
(f) "informal dispute settlement procedure or mechanism"
means an arbitration process or procedure by which the
manufacturer attempts to resolve disputes with consumers
regarding motor vehicle nonconformities and repairs that arise
during the vehicle's warranty period;
(g) "motor vehicle lessor" means a person who holds title
to a motor vehicle leased to a lessee under a written lease
agreement or who holds the lessor's rights under such agreement;
and
(h) "early termination costs" means expenses and
obligations incurred by a motor vehicle lessor as a result of an
early termination of a written lease agreement and surrender of
a motor vehicle to a manufacturer under subdivision 4, including
penalties for prepayment of finance arrangements and investment
tax credits not allowed for the year in which such termination
occurs and for prior years; and
(i) "early termination savings" means expenses and
obligations avoided by a motor vehicle lessor as a result of an
early termination of a written lease agreement and surrender of
a motor vehicle to a manufacturer under subdivision 4, including
the interest charges the motor vehicle lessor would have
otherwise paid to finance the motor vehicle.
Subd. 2. [MANUFACTURER'S DUTY TO REPAIR.] If a new motor
vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties,
and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer,
its agent, or its authorized dealer during the term of
the applicable express warranties or during the period of one
year two years following the date of original delivery of the
new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date,
the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer shall make
the repairs necessary to conform the vehicle to the applicable
express warranties, notwithstanding the fact that the repairs
are made after the expiration of the warranty term or
the one-year two-year period.
Subd. 3. [MANUFACTURER'S DUTY TO REFUND OR REPLACE.] (a)
If the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers are
unable to conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable
express warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or
condition which substantially impairs the use or market value of
the motor vehicle to the consumer after a reasonable number of
attempts, the manufacturer shall, at the consumer's option,
either replace the new motor vehicle with a comparable motor
vehicle or accept return of the vehicle from the consumer and
refund to the consumer the full purchase price, or the total
amount actually paid by the consumer under any vehicle lease,
including the cost of any options or other modifications
arranged, installed, or made by the manufacturer, its agent, or
its authorized dealer within 30 days after the date of original
delivery, and all other charges including, but not limited to,
sales tax, license fees and registration fees, reimbursement for
towing and rental vehicle expenses incurred by the consumer as a
result of the vehicle being out of service for warranty repair,
less a reasonable allowance for the consumer's use of the
vehicle not exceeding ten cents per mile driven or ten percent
of the purchase price or full lease cost of the vehicle,
whichever is less. If the manufacturer offers a replacement
vehicle under this section, the consumer has the option of
rejecting the replacement vehicle and requiring the manufacturer
to provide a refund. Refunds must be made to the consumer, and
lienholder, if any, as their interests appear on the records of
the registrar of motor vehicles. Refunds shall include the
amount stated by the dealer as the trade-in value of a
consumer's used motor vehicle, plus any additional amount paid
by the consumer for the new motor vehicle. For a lease vehicle,
refunds shall include the total amount actually paid by the
consumer under any vehicle lease, less any finance charges paid
by the consumer. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount
directly attributable to use by the consumer and any previous
consumer prior to the first report of the nonconformity to the
manufacturer, agent, or dealer during any period in which the
use and market value of the motor vehicle are not substantially
impaired. It is an affirmative defense to any claim under this
section (1) that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially
impair the use or market value, or (2) that a nonconformity is
the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or
alterations of a motor vehicle by anyone other than the
manufacturer, its agent or its authorized dealer.
(b) It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts
have been undertaken to conform a new motor vehicle to the
applicable express warranties, if (1) the same nonconformity has
been subject to repair four or more times by the manufacturer,
its agents, or its authorized dealers within the applicable
express warranty term or during the period of one year two years
following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle
to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, but the
nonconformity continues to exist, or (2) the vehicle is out of
service by reason of repair for a cumulative total of 30 or more
business days during the term or during the period, whichever is
the earlier date.
(c) If the nonconformity results in a complete failure of
the braking or steering system of the new motor vehicle and is
likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is
driven, it is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have
been undertaken to conform the vehicle to the applicable express
warranties if the nonconformity has been subject to repair at
least once by the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized
dealers within the applicable express warranty term or during
the period of one year two years following the date of original
delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, whichever is
the earlier date, and the nonconformity continues to exist.
(d) The term of an applicable express warranty, the
one-year two-year period and the 30-day period shall be extended
by any period of time during which repair services are not
available to the consumer because of a war, invasion, strike, or
fire, flood, or other natural disaster.
(e) The presumption contained in paragraph (b) applies
against a manufacturer only if the manufacturer, its agent, or
its authorized dealer has received prior written notification
from or on behalf of the consumer at least once and an
opportunity to cure the defect alleged. If the notification is
received by the manufacturer's agent or authorized dealer, the
agent or dealer must forward it to the manufacturer by certified
mail, return receipt requested.
(f) A consumer is eligible to receive a refund or
replacement vehicle under this section if the nonconformity is
reported to the manufacturer, its authorized agent or dealer, at
any time during the motor vehicle's express warranty period,
even if the motor vehicle's express warranty expires before the
requirements of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) have been met The
expiration of the time periods set forth in paragraph (b) does
not bar a consumer from receiving a refund or replacement
vehicle under paragraph (a) if the reasonable number of attempts
to correct the nonconformity causing the substantial impairment
occur within three years following the date of original delivery
of the new motor vehicle to a consumer, provided the consumer
first reported the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent,
or its authorized dealer during the term of the applicable
express warranty.
(g) At the time of purchase or lease, the manufacturer must
provide directly to the consumer a written statement on a
separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in
substantially the following form: "IMPORTANT: IF THIS VEHICLE
IS DEFECTIVE, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER STATE THE STATE'S LEMON
LAW TO REPLACEMENT OF IT OR A REFUND OF ITS PURCHASE PRICE OR
YOUR LEASE PAYMENTS. HOWEVER, TO BE ENTITLED TO REFUND OR
REPLACEMENT, YOU MUST FIRST NOTIFY THE MANUFACTURER, ITS AGENT,
OR ITS AUTHORIZED DEALER OF THE PROBLEM IN WRITING AND GIVE THEM
AN OPPORTUNITY TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE. YOU ALSO HAVE A RIGHT TO
SUBMIT YOUR CASE TO THE CONSUMER ARBITRATION PROGRAM WHICH THE
MANUFACTURER MUST OFFER IN MINNESOTA."
Subd. 4. [MANUFACTURER'S DUTY TO CONSUMERS WITH LEASED
VEHICLES.] A manufacturer has the same duties under this section
to a consumer who leases a motor vehicle as to a consumer who
purchases a new motor vehicle. The lessee has the same rights
against the manufacturer under this section as does the owner of
the motor vehicle, and the consumer may enforce the rights
directly against the manufacturer. If it is determined that a
consumer who leases a motor vehicle is entitled to a refund or
replacement vehicle pursuant to this section A consumer who
leases a new motor vehicle has the same rights against the
manufacturer under this section as a consumer who purchases a
new motor vehicle, except that, if it is determined that the
manufacturer must accept return of the consumer's leased vehicle
pursuant to subdivision 3, then the consumer lessee is not
entitled to a replacement vehicle, but is entitled only to a
refund as provided in this subdivision. In such a case, the
consumer's leased vehicle shall be returned to the
manufacturer and the consumer's written lease with the motor
vehicle lessor must be terminated. The manufacturer shall then
provide the owner of the leased vehicle with either a full
refund or a replacement vehicle. The owner of the returned
leased vehicle shall then provide the consumer with either the
replacement vehicle or that portion of the owner's refund to
which the consumer is entitled under this section the consumer
with a full refund of the amount actually paid by the consumer
on the written lease, including all additional charges set forth
in subdivision 3, if actually paid by the consumer, less a
reasonable allowance for use by the consumer as set forth in
subdivision 3. The manufacturer shall provide the motor vehicle
lessor with a full refund of the vehicle's original purchase
price plus any early termination costs, not to exceed 15 percent
of the vehicle's original purchase price, less the amount
actually paid by the consumer on the written lease.
Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit a motor
vehicle lessor from recovering early termination costs incurred
or early termination savings received pursuant to this section.
Subd. 5. [RESALE OR RE-LEASE OF RETURNED MOTOR VEHICLE.]
(a) If a motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of
subdivision 3 or a similar statute of another state, whether as
the result of a legal action or as the result of an informal
dispute settlement proceeding, it may not be resold or re-leased
in this state unless:
(1) the manufacturer provides the same express warranty it
provided to the original purchaser, except that the term of the
warranty need only last for 12,000 miles or 12 months after the
date of resale, whichever is earlier; and
(2) the manufacturer provides the consumer with a written
statement on a separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital
type, in substantially the following form: "IMPORTANT: THIS
VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER BECAUSE IT DID NOT
CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S EXPRESS WARRANTY AND THE
NONCONFORMITY WAS NOT CURED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AS PROVIDED
BY MINNESOTA LAW."
The provisions of this section apply to the resold or
re-leased motor vehicle for full term of the warranty required
under this subdivision.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), if a
new motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of
subdivision 3 or a similar statute of another state because of a
nonconformity resulting in a complete failure of the braking or
steering system of the motor vehicle likely to cause death or
serious bodily injury if the vehicle was driven, the motor
vehicle may not be resold in this state.
Subd. 6. [ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE
MECHANISM.] (a) If a manufacturer has established, or
participates in Any manufacturer doing business in this state,
entering into franchise agreements for the sale of its motor
vehicles in this state, or offering express warranties on its
motor vehicles sold or distributed for sale in this state shall
operate, or participate in, an informal dispute
settlement procedure mechanism located in the state of Minnesota
which complies with the provisions of the Code of Federal
Regulations, title 16, part 703 (1982), and the requirements of
this section, the provisions of subdivision 3 concerning refunds
or replacement do not apply to a consumer who has not first used
this procedure mechanism before commencing a civil action,
unless the manufacturer allows a consumer to commence an action
without first using this mechanism.
(b) The findings and decisions in An informal dispute
settlement procedure mechanism provided for by this section
shall address and state in writing whether the consumer would be
entitled to a refund or replacement under the presumptions and
criteria set out in subdivision 3, and are admissible as
nonbinding evidence in any legal action and are not subject to
further foundation requirements, at the time a request for
arbitration is made, provide to the consumer and to each person
who will arbitrate the consumer's dispute, information about
this section as approved and directed by the attorney general,
in consultation with interested parties. The informal dispute
settlement mechanism shall permit the parties to present or
submit any arguments based on this section and shall not
prohibit or discourage the consideration of any such arguments.
In developing and approving information about this section as
provided herein, the attorney general is not subject to the
rulemaking provisions of chapter 14.
(c) If, in an informal dispute settlement procedure
mechanism, it is decided that a consumer is entitled to a
replacement vehicle or refund under subdivision 3, then the
consumer has the option of selecting and receiving either a
replacement vehicle or a full refund as authorized by
subdivision 3. any refund or replacement offered by the
manufacturer or selected by a consumer shall include all amounts
authorized by subdivision 3.
(d) In any informal dispute settlement procedure provided
for by this section:
(1) No documents shall be received by any informal dispute
settlement mechanism unless those documents have been provided
to each of the parties in the dispute at or prior to the
mechanism's meeting, with an opportunity for the parties to
comment on the documents either in writing, or with oral
presentation at the request of the mechanism orally. If a
consumer is present during the informal dispute settlement
mechanism's meeting, the consumer may request postponement of
the mechanism's meeting to allow sufficient time to review any
documents presented at the time of the meeting which had not
been presented to the consumer prior to the meeting.
(2) (e) "Nonvoting" manufacturer or dealer representatives
shall not attend or participate in the informal dispute
settlement procedures unless the consumer is also present and
given a chance to be heard, or unless the consumer previously
consents to the manufacturer or dealer participation without the
consumer's presence and participation The informal dispute
settlement mechanism shall allow each party to appear and make
an oral presentation in the state of Minnesota unless the
consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision on the basis
of documents alone or by telephone, or unless the party fails to
appear for an oral presentation after reasonable prior written
notice. If the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for
decision on the basis of documents alone, then manufacturer or
dealer representatives may not participate in the discussion or
decision of the dispute.
(3) (f) Consumers shall be given an adequate opportunity to
contest a manufacturer's assertion that a nonconformity falls
within intended specifications for the vehicle by having the
basis of the manufacturer's claim appraised by a technical
expert selected and paid for by the consumer prior to the
informal dispute settlement hearing.
(4) (g) No disputes shall be heard Where there has been a
recent attempt by the manufacturer to repair a consumer's
vehicle, but no response has yet been received by the informal
dispute mechanism from the consumer as to whether the repairs
were successfully completed, the parties must be given the
opportunity to present any additional information regarding the
manufacturer's recent repair attempt before any final decision
is rendered by the informal dispute settlement mechanism. This
provision shall not prejudice a consumer's rights under this
section.
(5) (h) If the manufacturer shall provide and the informal
dispute settlement mechanism shall consider any relevant knows
that a technical service bulletins which may have been issued by
the manufacturer or lessor regarding the motor vehicle bulletin
directly applies to the specific mechanical problem being
disputed by the consumer, then the manufacturer shall provide
the technical service bulletin to the consumer at reasonable
cost. The mechanism shall review any such technical service
bulletins submitted by either party.
(i) A consumer may be charged a fee to participate in an
informal dispute settlement mechanism required by this section,
but the fee may not exceed the conciliation court filing fee in
the county where the arbitration is conducted.
(j) Any party to the dispute has the right to be
represented by an attorney in an informal dispute settlement
mechanism.
(k) The informal dispute settlement mechanism has all the
evidence-gathering powers granted an arbitrator under section
572.14.
(l) A decision issued in an informal dispute settlement
mechanism required by this section may be in writing and signed.
Subd. 7. [EXHAUSTION OF EFFECT AND ADMISSIBILITY OF
DECISION BY INFORMAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT REMEDY MECHANISM.] No
consumer shall be required to first participate in an informal
dispute settlement procedure before filing an action in district
court if the informal dispute settlement procedure does not
comply with the requirements of this section, notwithstanding
the procedure's compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations,
title 16, part 703 The decision issued in an informal dispute
settlement mechanism required by this section is nonbinding on
the parties involved, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
Any party, upon application, may remove the decision to district
court for a trial de novo. If an application to remove a
decision is not filed in the district court within 30 days after
the date the decision is received by the parties, then the
district court shall, upon application of a party, issue an
order confirming the decision. A written decision issued by an
informal dispute settlement mechanism, and any written findings
upon which the decision is based, are admissible as nonbinding
evidence in any subsequent legal action and are not subject to
further foundation requirements.
Subd. 8. [TREBLE DAMAGES FOR BAD FAITH APPEAL OF
DECISION.] If the district court finds that a party has removed
a decision of an informal dispute settlement mechanism in bad
faith, by asserting a claim or defense that is frivolous and
costly to the other party, or by asserting an unfounded position
solely to delay recovery by the other party, then the court
shall award to the prevailing party three times the actual
damages sustained, together with costs and disbursements,
including reasonable attorney's fees.
Subd. 8. 9. [CIVIL REMEDY.] Any consumer injured by a
violation of this section may bring a civil action to enforce
this section and recover costs and disbursements, including
reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the civil action. In
addition to the remedies provided herein, the attorney general
may bring an action pursuant to section 8.31 against any
manufacturer for violation of this section.
Subd. 9. 10. [LIMITATION ON ACTIONS.] An A civil action
brought under this section must be commenced within six
months three years of the date of original delivery of the new
motor vehicle's express warranty term expires, the date a
consumer is eligible under this section to bring an action in
district court, or the date a consumer receives written notice
of the final decision by the informal dispute settlement
mechanism, whichever is the later date vehicle to a consumer;
except that, if the consumer applies to an informal dispute
settlement mechanism within three years of the date of original
delivery of a new motor vehicle to a consumer, then any civil
action brought under this section must be commenced within six
months after the date of the final decision by the mechanism.
Subd. 10. 11. [REMEDY NONEXCLUSIVE.] Nothing in this
section limits the rights or remedies which are otherwise
available to a consumer under any other law.
Subd. 12. [DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.] In addition to any
investigative powers authorized by law, the attorney general may
inspect the records of the informal dispute settlement mechanism
upon reasonable notice, during regular business hours, and may
make available to the public information about the operation of
the mechanism, but data on an individual may not be disclosed
without the prior consent of the individual.
Sec. 2. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]
Section 1 is effective August 1, 1987, and applies to all
motor vehicles that are still under an applicable express
manufacturer's warranty and which were originally delivered to
the consumer during the previous one-year period.
Approved May 4, 1987
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes