Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
Laws of Minnesota 1987
CHAPTER 395-H.F.No. 137
An act relating to criminal procedure; providing a
procedure for ordering joint or separate trials for
jointly charged defendants; permitting the prosecution
to offer a rebuttal closing argument; amending
Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 631.07; proposing
coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 631.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. [631.035] [JOINTLY CHARGED DEFENDANTS; SEPARATE
OR JOINT TRIALS.]
When two or more defendants are jointly charged with a
felony, they may be tried separately or jointly in the
discretion of the court. In making its determination on whether
to order joinder or separate trials, the court shall consider
the nature of the offense charged, the impact on the victim, the
potential prejudice to the defendant, and the interests of
justice.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 631.07, is
amended to read:
631.07 [ORDER OF FINAL ARGUMENT.]
When the giving of evidence is concluded in a criminal
trial, unless the case is submitted on either or both sides
without argument, the plaintiff shall begin and the defendant
conclude the argument to the jury prosecution may make a closing
argument to the jury. The defense may then make its closing
argument to the jury. On the motion of the prosecution, the
court may permit the prosecution to reply in rebuttal if the
court determines that the defense has made in its closing
argument a misstatement of law or fact or a statement that is
inflammatory or prejudicial. The rebuttal must be limited to a
direct response to the misstatement of law or fact or the
inflammatory or prejudicial statement.
Sec. 3. [EFFECTIVE DATE.]
Sections 1 and 2 are effective August 1, 1987, and apply to
prosecutions commenced on or after that date.
Approved June 3, 1987
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes