Key: (1) language to be deleted (2) new language
Laws of Minnesota 1985
CHAPTER 286-H.F.No. 848
An act relating to children and families; providing
judicial procedures to protect the welfare of alleged
child abuse victims and their families; requiring
juvenile and criminal courts to give docket priority
to child abuse cases; providing for the examination of
child witnesses; clarifying the admissibility of
certain out-of-court statements; merging the crimes of
"intrafamilial sexual abuse" and "criminal sexual
conduct" and limiting the discretion of courts to stay
sentences of familial sexual abuse defendants;
requiring recordkeeping and tape recording guidelines
with respect to interviews with child abuse victims;
eliminating certain notice requirements; amending
Minnesota Statutes 1984, sections 260.011, subdivision
2; 260.133, subdivision 2; 260.135, subdivision 1;
260.155, by adding a subdivision; 260.156; 260.171,
subdivision 4; 260.172, subdivision 4, and by adding
subdivisions; 260.191, subdivision 1, and by adding
subdivisions; 595.02, subdivision 3; 609.341, by
adding a subdivision; 609.342; 609.343; 609.344;
609.345; 626.556, subdivision 11, and by adding a
subdivision; and 630.36; proposing coding for new law
in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 626 and 631; repealing
Minnesota Statutes 1984, sections 609.364 to 609.3644.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.011,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. The purpose of the laws relating to juvenile
courts is to secure for each child alleged or adjudicated
neglected or dependent and under the jurisdiction of the court,
the care and guidance, preferably in his own home, as will serve
the spiritual, emotional, mental, and physical welfare of the
child and the best interests of the state; to provide judicial
procedures which protect the welfare of the child; to preserve
and strengthen the child's family ties whenever possible,
removing him from the custody of his parents only when his
welfare or safety cannot be adequately safeguarded without
removal; and, when the child is removed from his own family, to
secure for him custody, care and discipline as nearly as
possible equivalent to that which should have been given by his
parents.
The purpose of the laws relating to children alleged or
adjudicated to be delinquent is to promote the public safety and
reduce juvenile delinquency by maintaining the integrity of the
substantive law prohibiting certain behavior and by developing
individual responsibility for lawful behavior. This purpose
should be pursued through means that are fair and just, that
recognize the unique characteristics and needs of children, and
that give children access to opportunities for personal and
social growth.
The laws relating to juvenile courts shall be liberally
construed to carry out these purposes.
Sec. 2. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.133,
subdivision 2, is amended to read:
Subd. 2. [TEMPORARY ORDER.] If it appears from the
notarized petition or by sworn affidavit that there are
reasonable grounds to believe the child is in immediate and
present danger of domestic child abuse, the court may grant an
ex parte temporary order for protection, pending a full
hearing. The court may grant relief as it deems proper,
including an order:
(1) restraining any party from committing acts of domestic
child abuse; or
(2) excluding the alleged abusing party from the dwelling
which the family or household members share or from the
residence of the child.
However, no order excluding the alleged abusing party from
the dwelling may be issued unless the court finds that:
(1) the order is in the best interests of the child or
children remaining in the dwelling; and
(2) a remaining adult family or household member is able to
care adequately for the child or children in the absence of the
excluded party; and
(3) the local welfare agency has developed a plan to
provide appropriate social services to the remaining family or
household members.
Before the temporary order is issued, the local welfare
agency shall advise the court and the other parties who are
present that appropriate social services will be provided to the
family or household members during the effective period of the
order.
An ex parte temporary order for protection shall be
effective for a fixed period not to exceed 14 days. Within five
days of the issuance of the temporary order, the petitioner
shall file a dependency and neglect petition with the court
pursuant to section 260.131, and the court shall give docket
priority to the petition.
The court may renew the temporary order for protection one
time for a fixed period not to exceed 14 days if a dependency
and neglect petition has been filed with the court and if the
court determines, upon informal review of the case file, that
the renewal is appropriate.
Sec. 3. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.135,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. After a petition has been filed and unless
the parties hereinafter named voluntarily appear, the court
shall set a time for a hearing and shall issue a summons
requiring the person who has custody or control of the child to
appear with the child before the court at a time and place
stated. The summons shall have a copy of the petition attached,
and shall advise the parties of the right to counsel and of the
consequences of failure to obey the summons. The court shall
give docket priority to any dependency, neglect, neglected and
in foster care, or delinquency petition that contains
allegations of child abuse over any other case except those
delinquency matters where a child is being held in a secure
detention facility. As used in this subdivision, "child abuse"
has the meaning given it in section 22, subdivision 2.
Sec. 4. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.155, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 4a. [EXAMINATION OF CHILD.] In any dependency,
neglect, or neglected and in foster care proceeding the court
may, on its own motion or the motion of any party, take the
testimony of a child witness informally when it is in the
child's best interests to do so. Informal procedures that may
be used by the court include taking the testimony of a child
witness outside the courtroom. The court may also require
counsel for any party to the proceeding to submit questions to
the court before the child's testimony is taken, and to submit
additional questions to the court for the witness after
questioning has been completed. The court may excuse the
presence of the child's parent, guardian, or custodian from the
room where the child is questioned in accordance with
subdivision 5.
Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.156, is
amended to read:
260.156 [CERTAIN OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS ADMISSIBLE.]
An out-of-court statement made by a child under the age of
ten years alleging, explaining, denying, or describing any act
of sexual contact or penetration performed with or on the child
or any act of physical abuse or neglect of the child by another,
not otherwise admissible by statute or rule of evidence, is
admissible in evidence in any dependency or neglect proceeding
or any proceeding for termination of parental rights if:
(a) The court finds that the time, content, and
circumstances of the statement and the reliability of the person
to whom the statement is made provide sufficient indicia of
reliability; and
(b) The proponent of the statement notifies other parties
of his intention to offer the statement and the particulars of
the statement sufficiently in advance of the proceeding at which
he intends to offer the statement into evidence, to provide the
parties with a fair opportunity to meet the statement.
Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.171,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. If the person who has taken the child into
custody determines that the child should be placed in a secure
detention facility or a shelter care facility, he shall advise
the child and as soon as is possible, the child's parent,
guardian, or custodian:
(a) of the reasons why the child has been taken into
custody and why he is being placed in a secure detention
facility or a shelter care facility; and
(b) of the location of the secure detention facility or
shelter care facility. If there is reason to believe that
disclosure of the location of the shelter care facility would
place the child's health and welfare in immediate endangerment,
disclosure of the location of the shelter care facility shall
not be made; and
(c) that the child's parent, guardian, or custodian and
attorney or guardian ad litem may make an initial visit to the
secure detention facility or shelter care facility at any time.
Subsequent visits by a parent, guardian, or custodian may be
made on a reasonable basis during visiting hours and by the
child's attorney or guardian ad litem at reasonable hours; and
(d) that the child may telephone his parents and an
attorney or guardian ad litem from the secure detention facility
or shelter care facility immediately after being admitted to the
facility and thereafter on a reasonable basis to be determined
by the director of the facility; and
(e) that the child may not be detained for acts as defined
in section 260.015, subdivision 5 at a secure detention facility
or shelter care facility longer than 36 hours, excluding
Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, unless a petition has been
filed within that time and the court orders the child's
continued detention, pursuant to section 260.172; and
(f) that the child may not be detained pursuant to section
260.165, subdivision 1, clause (a) or (c)(2), at a shelter care
facility longer than 72 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and
holidays, unless a petition has been filed within that time and
the court orders the child's continued detention, pursuant to
section 260.172; and
(g) of the date, time, and place of the detention hearing;
and
(h) that the child and the child's parent, guardian, or
custodian have the right to be present and to be represented by
counsel at the detention hearing, and that if they cannot afford
counsel, counsel will be appointed at public expense for the
child, if it is a delinquency matter, or for any party, if it is
a dependency, neglect, neglected and in foster care, or
termination of parental rights matter.
Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.172, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a. [PARENTAL VISITATION.] If a child has been taken
into custody under section 260.135, subdivision 5, or 260.165,
subdivision 1, clause (c)(2), and the court determines that the
child should continue in detention, the court shall include in
its order reasonable rules for supervised or unsupervised
parental visitation of the child in the shelter care facility
unless it finds that visitation would endanger the child's
physical or emotional well-being.
Sec. 8. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.172, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2b. [MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT.] (a) Except as
provided in paragraph (b), a child who is held in detention
because he or she is alleged to be a victim of child abuse as
defined in section 22, subdivision 2, may not be given mental
health treatment specifically for the effects of the alleged
abuse until the court finds that there is probable cause to
believe the abuse has occurred.
(b) A child described in paragraph (a) may be given mental
health treatment prior to a probable cause finding of child
abuse if the treatment is either agreed to by the child's parent
or guardian in writing, or ordered by the court according to the
standard contained in section 260.191, subdivision 1.
Sec. 9. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.172,
subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4. If a child held in detention under a court order
issued under subdivision 2 has not been released prior to
expiration of the order, the court or referee shall informally
review the child's case file to determine, under the standards
provided by subdivision 1, whether detention should be
continued. If detention is continued thereafter, informal
reviews such as these shall be held within every eight days,
excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, of the child's
detention.
A hearing, rather than an informal review of the child's
case file, shall be held at the request of any one of the
parties notified pursuant to subdivision 3, if that party
notifies the court that he wishes to present to the court new
evidence concerning whether the child should be continued in
detention.
In addition, if a child was taken into detention under
section 260.135, subdivision 5, or 260.165, subdivision 1,
clause (c)(2), and is held in detention under a court order
issued under subdivision 2, the court shall schedule and hold an
adjudicatory hearing on the petition within 60 days of the
detention hearing upon the request of any party to the
proceeding unless good cause is shown by a party to the
proceeding why the hearing should not be held within that time
period.
Sec. 10. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.191,
subdivision 1, is amended to read:
Subdivision 1. [DISPOSITIONS.] If the court finds that the
child is neglected, dependent, or neglected and in foster care,
it shall enter an order making any of the following dispositions
of the case:
(a) Place the child under the protective supervision of the
county welfare board or child placing agency in his own home
under conditions prescribed by the court directed to the
correction of the neglect or dependency of the child;
(b) Transfer legal custody to one of the following:
(1) a child placing agency; or
(2) the county welfare board.
In placing a child whose custody has been transferred under
this paragraph, the agency and board shall follow the order of
preference stated in section 260.181, subdivision 3;
(c) If the child is in need of special treatment and care
for his physical or mental health, the court may order the
child's parent, guardian, or custodian to provide it. If the
parent, guardian, or custodian fails to provide this treatment
or care, the court may order it provided. If the court's order
for mental health treatment is based on a diagnosis made by a
treatment professional, the court may order that the diagnosing
professional not provide the treatment to the child if it finds
that such an order is in the child's best interests.
Sec. 11. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.191, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 1d. [PARENTAL VISITATION.] If the court orders that
the child be placed outside of the child's home or present
residence, it shall set reasonable rules for supervised or
unsupervised parental visitation that contribute to the
objectives of the court order and the maintenance of the
familial relationship. No parent may be denied visitation
unless the court finds at the disposition hearing that the
visitation would act to prevent the achievement of the order's
objectives or that it would endanger the child's physical or
emotional well-being.
Sec. 12. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 260.191, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 2a. [SERVICE OF ORDER.] Any person who provides
services to a child under a disposition order, or who is subject
to the conditions of a disposition order shall be served with a
copy of the order in the manner provided in the rules for
juvenile courts.
Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 595.02,
subdivision 3, is amended to read:
Subd. 3. [CERTAIN OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS ADMISSIBLE.] An
out-of-court statement made by a child under the age of ten
years alleging, explaining, denying, or describing any act of
sexual contact or penetration performed with or on the child or
any act of physical abuse of the child by another, not otherwise
admissible by statute or rule of evidence, is admissible in
evidence if:
(a) the court or person authorized to receive evidence
finds, in a hearing conducted outside of the presence of the
jury, that the time, content, and circumstances of the statement
and the reliability of the person to whom the statement is made
provide sufficient indicia of reliability; and
(b) the child either:
(i) testifies at the proceedings; or
(ii) is unavailable as a witness and there is corroborative
evidence of the act; and
(c) the proponent of the statement notifies the adverse
party of his intention to offer the statement and the
particulars of the statement sufficiently in advance of the
proceeding at which he intends to offer the statement into
evidence to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to
prepare to meet the statement.
Sec. 14. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 609.341, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 15. [SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIP.] "Significant
relationship" means a situation in which the actor is:
(1) the complainant's parent, stepparent, or guardian;
(2) any of the following persons related to the complainant
by blood, marriage, or adoption: brother, sister, stepbrother,
stepsister, first cousin, aunt, uncle, nephew, niece,
grandparent, great-grandparent, great-uncle, great-aunt; or
(3) an adult who jointly resides intermittently or
regularly in the same dwelling as the complainant and who is not
the complainant's spouse.
Sec. 15. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 609.342, is
amended to read:
609.342 [CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT IN THE FIRST DEGREE.]
Subdivision 1. [CRIME DEFINED.] A person is guilty of
criminal sexual conduct in the first degree and may be sentenced
to imprisonment for not more than 20 years or to payment of a
fine of not more than $35,000, or both, if he engages in sexual
penetration with another person and if any of the following
circumstances exists:
(a) The complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor
is more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither
mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by
the complainant is a defense; or
(b) The complainant is at least 13 but less than 16 years
of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the
complainant and in a position of authority over the complainant,
and uses this authority to cause the complainant to submit.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the
act by the complainant is a defense; or
(c) Circumstances existing at the time of the act cause the
complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great bodily
harm to the complainant or another; or
(d) The actor is armed with a dangerous weapon or any
article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant to
reasonably believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or
threatens to use the weapon or article to cause the complainant
to submit; or
(e) The actor causes personal injury to the complainant,
and either of the following circumstances exist:
(i) The actor uses force or coercion to accomplish sexual
penetration; or
(ii) The actor knows or has reason to know that the
complainant is mentally defective, mentally incapacitated, or
physically helpless; or
(f) The actor is aided or abetted by one or more
accomplices within the meaning of section 609.05, and either of
the following circumstances exists:
(i) An accomplice uses force or coercion to cause the
complainant to submit; or
(ii) An accomplice is armed with a dangerous weapon or any
article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant
reasonably to believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or
threatens to use the weapon or article to cause the complainant
to submit;
(g) The actor has a significant relationship to the
complainant and the complainant was under 16 years of age at the
time of the sexual penetration. Neither mistake as to the
complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a
defense; or
(h) The actor has a significant relationship to the
complainant, the complainant was under 16 years of age at the
time of the sexual penetration, and:
(i) the actor or an accomplice used force or coercion to
accomplish the penetration;
(ii) the actor or an accomplice was armed with a dangerous
weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the
complainant to reasonably believe it could be a dangerous weapon
and used or threatened to use the dangerous weapon;
(iii) circumstances existed at the time of the act to cause
the complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great
bodily harm to the complainant or another;
(iv) the complainant suffered personal injury; or
(v) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over
an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to
the act by the complainant is a defense.
Subd. 2. [PENALTY.] A person convicted under subdivision 1
may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 20 years or
to a payment of a fine of not more than $35,000, or both.
Subd. 3. [STAY.] Except when imprisonment is required
under section 609.346, if a person is convicted under
subdivision 1, clause (g), the court may stay imposition or
execution of the sentence if it finds that:
(a) a stay is in the best interest of the complainant or
the family unit; and
(b) a professional assessment indicates that the offender
has been accepted by and can respond to a treatment program.
If the court stays imposition or execution of sentence, it
shall include the following as conditions of probation:
(1) incarceration in a local jail or workhouse; and
(2) a requirement that the offender complete a treatment
program.
Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 609.343, is
amended to read:
609.343 [CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT IN THE SECOND DEGREE.]
Subdivision 1. [CRIME DEFINED.] A person is guilty of
criminal sexual conduct in the second degree and may be
sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 15 years or to
payment of a fine of not more than $30,000, or both, if he
engages in sexual contact with another person and if any of the
following circumstances exists:
(a) The complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor
is more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither
mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by
the complainant is a defense. In a prosecution under this
clause, the state is not required to prove that the sexual
contact was coerced; or
(b) The complainant is at least 13 but less than 16 years
of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the
complainant and in a position of authority over the complainant,
and uses this authority to cause the complainant to submit.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the
act by the complainant is a defense; or
(c) Circumstances existing at the time of the act cause the
complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great bodily
harm to the complainant or another; or
(d) The actor is armed with a dangerous weapon or any
article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant to
reasonably believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or
threatens to use the dangerous weapon to cause the complainant
to submit; or
(e) The actor causes personal injury to the complainant,
and either of the following circumstances exist:
(i) The actor uses force or coercion to accomplish the
sexual contact; or
(ii) The actor knows or has reason to know that the
complainant is mentally defective, mentally incapacitated, or
physically helpless; or
(f) The actor is aided or abetted by one or more
accomplices within the meaning of section 609.05, and either of
the following circumstances exists:
(i) An accomplice uses force or coercion to cause the
complainant to submit; or
(ii) An accomplice is armed with a dangerous weapon or any
article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the complainant to
reasonably believe it to be a dangerous weapon and uses or
threatens to use the weapon or article to cause the complainant
to submit;
(g) The actor has a significant relationship to the
complainant and the complainant was under 16 years of age at the
time of the sexual contact. Neither mistake as to the
complainant's age nor consent to the act by the complainant is a
defense; or
(h) The actor has a significant relationship to the
complainant, the complainant was under 16 years of age at the
time of the sexual contact, and:
(i) the actor or an accomplice used force or coercion to
accomplish the contact;
(ii) the actor or an accomplice was armed with a dangerous
weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the
complainant to reasonably believe it could be a dangerous weapon
and used or threatened to use the dangerous weapon;
(iii) circumstances existed at the time of the act to cause
the complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great
bodily harm to the complainant or another;
(iv) the complainant suffered personal injury; or
(v) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over
an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to
the act by the complainant is a defense.
Subd. 2. [PENALTY.] A person convicted under subdivision 1
may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 15 years or
to a payment of a fine of not more than $30,000, or both.
Subd. 3. [STAY.] Except when imprisonment is required
under section 609.346, if a person is convicted under
subdivision 1, clause (g), the court may stay imposition or
execution of the sentence if it finds that:
(a) a stay is in the best interest of the complainant or
the family unit; and
(b) a professional assessment indicates that the offender
has been accepted by and can respond to a treatment program.
If the court stays imposition or execution of sentence, it
shall include the following as conditions of probation:
(1) incarceration in a local jail or workhouse; and
(2) a requirement that the offender complete a treatment
program.
Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 609.344, is
amended to read:
609.344 [CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT IN THE THIRD DEGREE.]
Subdivision 1. [CRIME DEFINED.] A person is guilty of
criminal sexual conduct in the third degree and may be sentenced
to imprisonment for not more than ten years, or to payment of a
fine of not more than $20,000, or both, if he engages in sexual
penetration with another person and any of the following
circumstances exists:
(a) The complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor
is no more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither
mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by
the complainant shall be a defense; or
(b) The complainant is at least 13 but less than 16 years
of age and the actor is more than 24 months older than the
complainant. In any such case it shall be an affirmative
defense, which must be proved by a preponderance of the
evidence, that the actor believes the complainant to be 16 years
of age or older. If the actor in such a case is no more than 48
months but more than 24 months older than the complainant, he
may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years.
Consent by the complainant is not a defense; or
(c) The actor uses force or coercion to accomplish the
penetration; or
(d) The actor knows or has reason to know that the
complainant is mentally defective, mentally incapacitated, or
physically helpless; or
(e) The complainant is at least 16 but less than 18 years
of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the
complainant and in a position of authority over the complainant,
and uses this authority to cause the complainant to submit.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the
act by the complainant is a defense;
(f) The actor has a significant relationship to the
complainant and the complainant was at least 16 but under 18
years of age at the time of the sexual penetration. Neither
mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by
the complainant is a defense; or
(g) The actor has a significant relationship to the
complainant, the complainant was at least 16 but under 18 years
of age at the time of the sexual penetration, and:
(i) the actor or an accomplice used force or coercion to
accomplish the penetration;
(ii) the actor or an accomplice was armed with a dangerous
weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the
complainant to reasonably believe it could be a dangerous weapon
and used or threatened to use the dangerous weapon;
(iii) circumstances existed at the time of the act to cause
the complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great
bodily harm to the complainant or another;
(iv) the complainant suffered personal injury; or
(v) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over
an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to
the act by the complainant is a defense.
Subd. 2. [PENALTY.] A person convicted under subdivision 1
may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or
to a payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both.
Subd. 3. [STAY.] Except when imprisonment is required
under section 609.346, if a person is convicted under
subdivision 1, clause (f), the court may stay imposition or
execution of the sentence if it finds that:
(a) a stay is in the best interest of the complainant or
the family unit; and
(b) a professional assessment indicates that the offender
has been accepted by and can respond to a treatment program.
If the court stays imposition or execution of sentence, it
shall include the following as conditions of probation:
(1) incarceration in a local jail or workhouse; and
(2) a requirement that the offender complete a treatment
program.
Sec. 18. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 609.345, is
amended to read:
609.345 [CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT IN THE FOURTH DEGREE.]
Subdivision 1. [CRIME DEFINED.] A person is guilty of
criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree and may be
sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years, or to
payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if he
engages in sexual contact with another person and if any of the
following circumstances exists:
(a) The complainant is under 13 years of age and the actor
is no more than 36 months older than the complainant. Neither
mistake as to the complainant's age or consent to the act by the
complainant is a defense. In a prosecution under this clause,
the state is not required to prove that the sexual contact was
coerced; or
(b) The complainant is at least 13 but less than 16 years
of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the
complainant or in a position of authority over the complainant
and uses this authority to cause the complainant to submit. In
any such case, it shall be an affirmative defense which must be
proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the actor
believes the complainant to be 16 years of age or older; or
(c) The actor uses force or coercion to accomplish the
sexual contact; or
(d) The actor knows or has reason to know that the
complainant is mentally defective, mentally incapacitated, or
physically helpless; or
(e) The complainant is at least 16 but less than 18 years
of age and the actor is more than 48 months older than the
complainant and in a position of authority over the complainant,
and uses this authority to cause the complainant to submit.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to the
act by the complainant is a defense;
(f) The actor has a significant relationship to the
complainant and the complainant was at least 16 but under 18
years of age at the time of the sexual contact. Neither mistake
as to the complainant's age nor consent to the act by the
complainant is a defense; or
(g) The actor has a significant relationship to the
complainant, the complainant was at least 16 but under 18 years
of age at the time of the sexual contact, and:
(i) the actor or an accomplice used force or coercion to
accomplish the contact;
(ii) the actor or an accomplice was armed with a dangerous
weapon or any article used or fashioned in a manner to lead the
complainant to reasonably believe it could be a dangerous weapon
and used or threatened to use the dangerous weapon;
(iii) circumstances existed at the time of the act to cause
the complainant to have a reasonable fear of imminent great
bodily harm to the complainant or another;
(iv) the complainant suffered personal injury; or
(v) the sexual abuse involved multiple acts committed over
an extended period of time.
Neither mistake as to the complainant's age nor consent to
the act by the complainant is a defense.
Subd. 2. [PENALTY.] A person convicted under subdivision 1
may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or
to a payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
Subd. 3. [STAY.] Except when imprisonment is required
under section 609.346, if a person is convicted under
subdivision 1, clause (f), the court may stay imposition or
execution of the sentence if it finds that:
(a) a stay is in the best interest of the complainant or
the family unit; and
(b) a professional assessment indicates that the offender
has been accepted by and can respond to a treatment program.
If the court stays imposition or execution of sentence, it
shall include the following as conditions of probation:
(1) incarceration in a local jail or workhouse; and
(2) a requirement that the offender complete a treatment
program.
Sec. 19. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 626.556,
subdivision 11, is amended to read:
Subd. 11. [RECORDS.] All records maintained by a local
welfare agency under this section, including any written reports
filed under subdivision 7, shall be private data on individuals,
except insofar as copies of reports are required by subdivision
7 to be sent to the local police department or the county
sheriff. Report records maintained by any police department or
the county sheriff shall be private data on individuals except
the reports shall be made available to the investigating,
petitioning, or prosecuting authority. The welfare board shall
make available to the investigating, petitioning, or prosecuting
authority any records which contain information relating to a
specific incident of neglect or abuse which is under
investigation, petition, or prosecution and information relating
to any prior incidents of neglect or abuse involving any of the
same persons. The records shall be collected and maintained in
accordance with the provisions of chapter 13. In conducting
investigations and assessments pursuant to this section, the
notice required by section 13.04, subdivision 2, need not be
provided to a minor under the age of 10 who is the alleged
victim of abuse or neglect. An individual subject of a record
shall have access to the record in accordance with those
sections, except that the name of the reporter shall be
confidential while the report is under assessment or
investigation. After the assessment or investigation is
completed, the name of the reporter shall be confidential but
shall be accessible to the individual subject of the record upon
court order.
Records maintained by local welfare agencies, the police
department or county sheriff under this section shall be
destroyed as described in clauses (a) to (c):
(a) If upon assessment or investigation a report is found
to be unsubstantiated, notice of intent to destroy records of
the report shall be mailed to the individual subject of the
report. At the subject's request the records shall be
maintained as private data. If no request from the subject is
received within 30 days of mailing the notice of intent to
destroy, the records shall be destroyed.
(b) All records relating to reports which, upon assessment
or investigation, are found to be substantiated shall be
destroyed seven years after the date of the final entry in the
case record.
(c) All records of reports which, upon initial assessment
or investigation, cannot be substantiated or disproved to the
satisfaction of the local welfare agency, local police
department or county sheriff may be kept for a period of one
year. If the local welfare agency, local police department or
county sheriff is unable to substantiate the report within that
period, each agency unable to substantiate the report shall
destroy its records relating to the report in the manner
provided by clause (a).
Sec. 20. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 626.556, is
amended by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 11a. [DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN
CERTAIN CASES.] When interviewing a minor under subdivision 10,
an individual does not include the parent or guardian of the
minor for purposes of section 13.04, subdivision 2, when the
parent or guardian is the alleged perpetrator of the abuse or
neglect.
Sec. 21. [626.561] [INTERVIEWS WITH CHILD ABUSE VICTIMS.]
Subdivision 1. [POLICY.] It is the policy of this state to
encourage adequate and accurate documentation of the number and
content of interviews conducted with alleged child abuse victims
during the course of a child abuse assessment, criminal
investigation, or prosecution, and to discourage interviews that
are unnecessary, duplicative, or otherwise not in the best
interests of the child.
Subd. 2. [DEFINITIONS.] As used in this section:
(a) "child abuse" means physical or sexual abuse as defined
in section 626.556, subdivision 2;
(b) "government employee" means an employee of a state or
local agency, and any person acting as an agent of a state or
local agency;
(c) "interview" means a statement of an alleged child abuse
victim which is given or made to a government employee during
the course of a child abuse assessment, criminal investigation,
or prosecution; and
(d) "record" means an audio or videotape recording of an
interview, or a written record of an interview.
Subd. 3. [RECORD REQUIRED.] Whenever an interview is
conducted, the interviewer must make a record of the interview.
The record must contain the following information:
(1) the date, time, place, and duration of the interview;
(2) the identity of the persons present at the interview;
and
(3) if the record is in writing, a summary of the
information obtained during the interview.
The records shall be maintained by the interviewer in
accordance with applicable provisions of section 626.556,
subdivision 11 and chapter 13.
Subd. 4. [GUIDELINES ON TAPE RECORDING OF
INTERVIEWS.] Every county attorney's office shall be responsible
for developing written guidelines on the tape recording of
interviews by government employees who conduct child abuse
assessments, criminal investigations, or prosecutions. The
guidelines are public data as defined in section 13.02,
subdivision 14.
Sec. 22. Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 630.36, is
amended to read:
630.36 [ISSUES, HOW DISPOSED OF.]
Subdivision 1. [ORDER.] The issues on the calendar shall
be disposed of in the following order, unless, upon the
application of either party, for good cause, the court directs
an indictment or complaint to be tried out of its order:
(1) Indictments or complaints for felony, where the
defendant is in custody;
(2) Indictments or complaints for misdemeanor, where the
defendant is in custody;
(3) Indictments or complaints alleging child abuse, as
defined in subdivision 2, where the defendant is on bail;
(4) Indictments or complaints for felony, where the
defendant is on bail; and
(4) (5) Indictments or complaints for misdemeanor, where
the defendant is on bail.
After his plea, the defendant shall be entitled to at least
four days to prepare for his trial, if he requires it.
Subd. 2. [CHILD ABUSE DEFINED.] As used in subdivision 1,
"child abuse" means any act which involves a minor victim and
which constitutes a violation of section 609.221, 609.222,
609.223, 609.2231, 609.255, 609.321, 609.322, 609.323, 609.324,
609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.377, 609.378, or
617.246, or section 609.224 if the minor victim is a family or
household member of the defendant.
Sec. 23. [631.046] [AUTHORIZING PRESENCE OF PARENT FOR
MINOR PROSECUTING WITNESS.]
Notwithstanding any other law, a prosecuting witness under
18 years of age in a case involving child abuse as defined in
section 22, subdivision 2, may choose to have in attendance a
parent, guardian, or other supportive person, whether or not a
witness, at the omnibus hearing or at the trial, during
testimony of the prosecuting witness. If the person so chosen
is also a prosecuting witness, the prosecution shall present on
noticed motion, evidence that the person's attendance is both
desired by the prosecuting witness for support and will be
helpful to the prosecuting witness. Upon that showing the court
shall grant the request unless information presented by the
defendant or noticed by the court establishes that the support
person's attendance during the testimony of the prosecuting
witness would pose a substantial risk of influencing or
affecting the content of that testimony.
Sec. 24. [REPEALER.]
Minnesota Statutes 1984, sections 609.364, 609.3641,
609.3642, 609.3643, and 609.3644, are repealed.
Approved May 31, 1985
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes