Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Office of the Revisor of Statutes

116J.79 PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCES.
    Subdivision 1. Requests for conference. The bureau, at the request of any person,
proceeding in accordance with this section, may conduct a preapplication conference, pending the
formal submission of application forms, in which affected agencies shall participate to the extent
practicable in order to clarify the nature and scope of their interest, to provide guidance regarding
license application and review procedures, and to coordinate agency actions and data collection
or submission regarding license application.
    Subd. 2. Multiple licenses; agencies to provide review and opinion. If, in the course of a
preapplication conference, it becomes clear in the opinion of the director that a proposed business
undertaking: (a) may require multiple licenses from the same or different state departments; (b)
will take place in phases over an extended period of time; (c) will involve substantial expense
for preparation of detailed plans, specifications and license applications; or (d) is of a new
or unique nature, then each affected agency shall, at the request of the director to the extent
practicable, provide the applicant with a written review and opinion as to all licenses which the
agency would require for the proposed undertaking, the standards and conditions which would
have to be met in order to obtain the licenses, timetables involved, and any properly related
circumstances or findings.
    Subd. 3. Written opinions; time limits; extensions. Each agency participating in the review
and opinion process shall render the written opinion within a period not exceeding 60 days from
the date fixed by the director. This period may be extended by the director at the request of an
interested agency for the further consideration of information provided in accordance with this
section. The director shall advise the person having requested the review and opinion of the
extension, the reasons for it, and the revised period fixed by the director for rendering the written
opinion. The person shall be entitled to confer with the bureau and with any agency having been
granted an extension of time to ascertain what further information, if any, is required to facilitate
the rendering of the review and opinion.
    Subd. 4. Effect of review and opinion procedure. A preapplication review and opinion
shall not relieve the person from the responsibility of obtaining any required licenses and shall be
contingent upon the submission of all detailed plans, specifications, and information required
for license applications. An agency's written opinion as to required licenses shall remain in
effect indefinitely for the proposed business undertaking, project, or activity as described in the
applicant's submission. However, if new license requirements or related standards over which
an agency has no control or discretion in establishing subsequently become effective, the new
license requirements or standards shall not be considered to have been part of the preapplication
review and opinion. The opinion of the agency may be modified or amended by the agency at any
time and shall not prohibit the agency from requiring additional licenses as deemed necessary
for the applicant.
    Subd. 5. Rules of procedure. The bureau shall promulgate rules for the procedures to be
followed in the conduct of preapplication reviews and opinions.
History: 1981 c 342 art 3 s 7; 1981 c 356 s 248

Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes