Except as otherwise provided in subdivisions 2 and 3, the amount of the minimum financial security benchmark for an insurer is the greater of:
(1) the authorized control level risk-based capital applicable to the insurer as defined under section 60A.60, subdivision 11, clause (3); or
(2) the minimum capital or minimum surplus required for maintenance of an insurer's certificate of authority.
The commissioner may, according to the controlling factors specified in subdivision 6, establish by order a minimum financial security benchmark to apply to a specific insurer provided it is not less than the amount determined under subdivision 1.
The commissioner may establish a minimum financial security benchmark that is a multiple of authorized control level risk-based capital to apply to any class of insurers provided the amount established is not less than the amount specified under subdivision 1.
The commissioner shall determine the amount of surplus that constitutes an insurer's minimum financial security benchmark as an amount that will provide reasonable security against contingencies affecting the insurer's financial position that are not fully covered by reserves or by reinsurance.
The commissioner shall consider the risks of:
(1) increases in the frequency or severity of losses beyond the levels contemplated by the rates charged;
(2) increases in expenses beyond those contemplated by the rates charged;
(3) decreases in the value of or the return on invested assets below those planned on;
(4) changes in economic conditions that would make liquidity more important than contemplated and would force untimely sale of assets or prevent timely investments;
(5) currency devaluation to which the insurer may be subject; and
(6) any other contingencies the commissioner can identify that may affect the insurer's operations.
In making the determination under subdivision 4, the commissioner shall take into account the following factors:
(1) the most reliable information available as to the magnitude of the various risks under subdivision 5;
(2) the extent to which the risks specified under subdivision 5 are independent of each other or are related, and whether any dependency is direct or inverse;
(3) the insurer's recent history of profits or losses;
(4) the extent to which the insurer has provided protection against the contingencies in other ways than the establishment of surplus, including redundancy of premiums, adjustability of contracts under their terms, investment valuation reserves whether voluntary or mandatory, appropriate reinsurance, the use of conservative actuarial assumptions to provide a margin of security, reserve adjustments in recognition of previous rate inadequacies, contingency or catastrophe reserves, diversification of assets, and underwriting risks;
(5) independent judgments of the soundness of the insurer's operations, as evidenced by the ratings of reliable professional financial reporting services; and
(6) any other relevant factors.
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes