Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Office of the Revisor of Statutes

Chapter 216C

Section 216C.051


Recent History

    Subdivision 1.[Repealed, 1Sp2003 c 11 art 3 s 16]
    Subd. 2. Establishment. (a) There is established a Legislative Electric Energy Task Force to
study future electric energy sources and costs and to make recommendations for legislation for an
environmentally and economically sustainable and advantageous electric energy supply.
    (b) The task force consists of:
    (1) ten members of the house of representatives including the chairs of the Environment and
Natural Resources Committee and the Energy Finance and Policy Division and eight members to
be appointed by the speaker of the house, four of whom must be from the minority caucus; and
    (2) ten members of the senate including the chairs of the Environment, Energy and Natural
Resources Budget Division and Energy, Utilities, Technology and Communications committees
and eight members to be appointed by the Subcommittee on Committees, four of whom must be
from the minority caucus.
    (c) The task force may employ staff, contract for consulting services, and may reimburse the
expenses of persons requested to assist it in its duties other than state employees or employees of
electric utilities. The director of the Legislative Coordinating Commission shall assist the task
force in administrative matters. The task force shall elect cochairs, one member of the house and
one member of the senate from among the committee and subcommittee chairs named to the
committee. The task force members from the house shall elect the house cochair, and the task
force members from the senate shall elect the senate cochair.
    Subd. 3. Technical and economic considerations, analyses, and recommendations. (a)
In light of the electric energy guidelines established in subdivision 7 and utility resource plans
and competitive bidding dockets before the commission, the task force shall gather information
and make recommendations to the legislature regarding potential electric energy resources. The
task force may contract with one or more energy policy experts and energy economists to assist
it in its analysis. The task force may not contract for service nor employ any person who was
involved in any capacity in any portion of any proceeding before the Public Utilities Commission,
the administrative law judge, the state Court of Appeals, or the United States Nuclear Regulatory
Commission related to the dry cask storage proposal on Prairie Island. The task force must gather
information on at least the following electric energy resources, but may expand its inquiry as
warranted by the information collected:
(1) wind energy;
(2) hydrogen as a fuel carrier produced from renewable and fossil fuel resources;
(3) biomass;
(4) decomposition gases produced by solid waste management facilities;
(5) solid waste as a direct fuel or refuse-derived fuel; and
(6) clean coal technology.
(b) In evaluating these electric energy resources, the task force must consider at least the
(1) to the best of forecasting abilities, how much electric generation capacity and demand
for electric energy is necessary to maintain a strong economy and a high quality of life in the
state over the next 15 to 20 years; how is this demand level affected by achievement of the
maximum reasonably feasible and cost-effective demand-side management and generation and
distribution efficiencies;
(2) what alternative forms of energy can provide a stable supply of energy and are producible
and sustainable in the state and at what cost;
(3) what are the costs to the state and ratepayers to ensure that new electric energy generation
utilizes less environmentally damaging sources; how do those costs change as the time frame for
development and implementation of new generation sources is compressed;
(4) what are the implications for delivery systems for energy produced in areas of the state
that do not now have high-volume transmission capability; are new transmission technologies
being developed that can address some of the concerns with transmission; can a more dispersed
electric generation system lessen the need for long-distance transmission;
(5) what are the actual costs and benefits of purchasing electricity and fuel to generate
electricity from outside the state; what are the present costs to the state's economy of exporting
a large percentage of the state's energy dollars and what is the future economic impact of
continuing to do so;
(6) are there benefits to be had from a large immediate investment in quickly implementing
alternative electric energy sources in terms of developing an exportable technology and/or
commodity; is it feasible to turn around the flow of dollars for energy so that the state imports
dollars and exports energy and energy technology; what is a reasonable time frame for the shift
if it is possible;
(7) are there taxation or regulatory barriers to developing more sustainable and less
problematic electric energy generation; what are they specifically and how can they be specifically
(8) can an approach be developed that moves quickly to development and implementation of
alternative energy sources that can be forgiving of interim failures but that is also sufficiently
deliberate to ensure ultimate success on a large scale; and
(9) in what specific ways can the state assist regional energy suppliers to accelerate phasing
out energy production processes that produce wastes or emissions that must necessarily be
carefully controlled and monitored to minimize adverse effects on the environment and human
health and to assist in developing and implementing base load energy production that both
prevents or minimizes by its nature adverse environmental and human health effects and utilizes
resources that are available or producible in the state.
(c) The task force must study issues related to the transportation of spent nuclear fuel
from this state to interim or permanent repositories outside this state. The task force must also
gather information on at least the following factors, but may expand its inquiry as warranted by
the information collected:
(1) Minnesota's actual and projected electricity demand;
(2) electricity export potential;
(3) inventory of energy resources currently used to generate all electricity sold in Minnesota
and an analysis of the social, economic, and environmental benefits and burdens associated
with each energy resource;
(4) electricity demand savings from greater efficiency; and
(5) job growth and economic development potential.
(d) The public utility that owns the Prairie Island and Monticello nuclear generation facilities
shall update the reports required under section 116C.772, subdivisions 3 to 5, and shall submit
those updates periodically to the Public Utilities Commission with the utility's resource plan filing
under section 216B.2422 and to the task force.
    Subd. 4.[Repealed, 1Sp2003 c 11 art 3 s 16]
    Subd. 4a. Report and recommendations. By January 15, 2005, and every two years
thereafter, the task force shall submit a report to the chairs of the committees in the house
of representatives and the senate that have responsibility for energy and for environmental
and natural resources issues that contains an overview of information gathered and analyses
that have been prepared, and specific recommendations, if any, for legislative action that will
ensure development and implementation of electric energy policy that will provide the state with
adequate, renewable, and economic electric power for the long term. The report shall also identify
issues that must be addressed to provide Minnesotans with adequate electricity from in-state
renewable energy sources for the long term and export to adjacent states.
    Subd. 5.[Repealed, 1Sp2003 c 11 art 3 s 16]
    Subd. 6. Assessment; appropriation. On request by the cochairs of the Legislative Task
Force and after approval of the Legislative Coordinating Commission, the commissioner
of commerce shall assess from all public utilities, generation and transmission cooperative
electric associations, and municipal power agencies providing electric or natural gas services in
Minnesota, in addition to assessments made under section 216B.62, the amount requested for
the operation of the task force not to exceed $250,000 in a fiscal year. The amount assessed
under this section is appropriated to the director of the Legislative Coordinating Commission
for those purposes, and is available until expended. The department shall apportion those costs
among all energy utilities in proportion to their respective gross operating revenues from the
sale of gas or electric service within the state during the last calendar year. For the purposes of
administrative efficiency, the department shall assess energy utilities and issue bills in accordance
with the billing and assessment procedures provided in section 216B.62, to the extent that these
procedures do not conflict with this subdivision.
    Subd. 7. Guidelines; preferred electric generation sources; definitions. (a) The
Legislative Task Force on Electric Energy shall undertake its responsibilities in light of the
guidelines specified in this subdivision.
(b) The highest priority in electric energy production and consumption is conservation of
electric energy and management of demand by all segments of the community.
(c) The following energy sources for generating electric power distributed in the state, listed
in their descending order of preference, based on minimizing long-term negative environmental,
social, and economic burdens imposed by the specific energy sources, are:
(1) wind and solar;
(2) biomass and low-head or refurbished hydropower;
(3) decomposition gases produced by solid waste management facilities, natural gas-fired
cogeneration, and waste materials or byproducts combined with natural gas;
(4) natural gas, hydropower that is not low-head or refurbished hydropower, and solid
waste as a direct fuel or refuse-derived fuel; and
(5) coal and nuclear power.
(d) For the purposes of paragraph (c) within each clause, the more efficient an energy source
is in generating electricity or the more efficient a technology is that utilizes an energy source, the
more preferred it is for use in generating electricity for distribution and consumption in the state.
(e) For the purposes of paragraph (c), clauses (3) and (4), the use of waste materials and
byproducts for generating electric power must be limited to those waste materials and byproducts
that are necessarily generated or produced by efficient processes and systems. Preventing and
minimizing waste and byproducts are preferred in every situation to relying on the continued
generation or production of waste materials and byproducts.
(f) For the purposes of this section, "preferred" or "renewable" energy sources are those
described in paragraph (c), clauses (1) to (3), and "subordinate" or "traditional" energy sources are
those described in paragraph (c), clauses (4) and (5).
(g) For the purposes of this section:
(1) "biomass" means herbaceous crops, trees, agricultural waste, and aquatic plant matter,
excluding mixed municipal solid waste, as defined in section 115A.03, used to generate
electricity; and
(2) "low-head hydropower" means a hydropower facility that has a head of less than 66 feet.
    Subd. 8. Subpoena power. The task force may issue a subpoena under section 3.153 to
any person for production of information held by that person that is relevant to the work of
the task force.
    Subd. 8a. Manitoba Hydro information. (a) By January 1, 2008, and each year thereafter,
the task force shall request the Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board to provide the following
information for each community that is a signatory to the Northern Flood Agreement, including
South Indian Lake:
    (1) median household income and number of residents employed full time and part time;
    (2) the number of outstanding claims filed against Manitoba Hydro by individuals and
communities and the number of claims settled by Manitoba Hydro; and
    (3) the amount of shoreline damaged by flooding and erosion and the amount of shoreline
restored and cleaned.
    (b) Nothing in this section shall be construed as a directive to the government of Canada or
the province of Manitoba.
    (c) For the purposes of this subdivision, "Northern Flood Agreement" means the agreement
entered into by the Northern Flood Committee, Incorporated, the Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board,
the province of Manitoba, and the government of Canada on December 16, 1977.
    Subd. 9. Expiration. This section is repealed June 30, 2010.
History: 1994 c 641 art 5 s 1; 1995 c 4 s 1; 1995 c 248 art 2 s 5; 1996 c 266 s 1; 1997 c 191
art 1 s 6,7; 1998 c 380 s 1; 1999 c 19 s 1; 2000 c 436 s 1; 2001 c 212 art 8 s 8,9; 1Sp2001 c 4 art
6 s 50; 1Sp2003 c 11 art 3 s 6-9; 2007 c 57 art 2 s 24-26; 2007 c 136 art 3 s 2

Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes