MN Legislature

Accessibility menu

Bills use visual text formatting such as stricken text to denote deleted language, and underlined text to denote new language. For users of the jaws screenreader it is recommended to configure jaws to use the proofreading scheme which will alter the pitch of the reading voice when reading stricken and underlined text. Instructions for configuring your jaws reader are provided by following this link.
If you can not or do not wish to configure your screen reader, deleted language will begin with the phrase "deleted text begin" and be followed by the phrase "deleted text end", new language will begin with the phrase "new text begin" and be followed by "new text end". Skip to text of SF 2532.


Revisor of Statutes Menu

SF 2532

2nd Engrossment - 86th Legislature (2009 - 2010) Posted on 03/08/2010 11:41am

KEY: stricken = removed, old language. underscored = added, new language.



Version List Authors and Status

A bill for an act
relating to telecommunications; reducing the plurality necessary in a local
election for a municipality to own and operate a telephone exchange; granting
authority to counties; providing limitations on a municipality's method of
financing a telephone exchange; requiring a feasibility study; prohibiting
discrimination in favor of a municipality's own telephone exchange; requiring
competitive bidding;amending Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 237.19.


Section 1.

Minnesota Statutes 2008, section 237.19, is amended to read:


Subdivision 1.

Referendum required.

Any municipality shall have the right to own
and operate a telephone exchange within its own borders, subject to the provisions of this
chapter. It may construct such plant, or purchase an existing plant by agreement with the
owner, or where it cannot agree with the owner on price, it may acquire an existing plant
by condemnation, as hereinafter provided, but in no case shall a municipality construct
or purchase such a plant or proceed to acquire an existing plant by condemnation until
such action by it is authorized by a majority of the electors voting upon the proposition at
a general election or a special election called for that purpose, and if the proposal is to
construct a new exchange where an exchange already exists, it shall not be authorized to
do so unless 65 percent a majority of those voting thereon vote in favor of the undertaking.
A municipality that owns and operates a telephone exchange may enter into a joint
venture as a partner or shareholder with a telecommunications organization to provide
telecommunications services within its service area. For the purpose of this section
"municipality" includes a county.

Subd. 2.

Taxpayer protections.

(a) Notwithstanding another law, a municipality
shall not, in whole or in part, finance, refinance, pay the costs or expenses of, or otherwise
fund the construction, acquisition, or operation of a telephone exchange, directly or
indirectly, through issuance of debt, liability, or obligation, or secure or otherwise become
contingently liable for the costs or expenses, except through the use of the revenues
directly earned or to be earned from the operation of the telephone exchange. This
subdivision does not preclude a municipality that has, on the effective date of this act,
already approved a sales tax from using the revenue derived from the tax for constructing,
acquiring, or operating a telephone exchange.

(b) This subdivision does not prohibit:

(1) the use of otherwise available funds to pay the reasonable costs of studying the
feasibility of operating a telephone exchange or conducting an election on a proposal for
the operation of a telephone exchange; or

(2) the sale to nongovernmental investors of revenue bonds to fund the construction
or acquisition of a telephone exchange if principal, interest, and premium are payable
upon maturity or default and are actually paid solely from, and all obligations under the
bonds are secured solely by, the net revenues earned or to be earned by the ownership
or operation of the telephone exchange.

Subd. 3.

Feasibility study.

(a) Before conducting the referendum under subdivision
1, the municipality must prepare and make publicly available a written report on the
feasibility of owning or acquiring and operating a telephone exchange. The feasibility
report must, at minimum, address and disclose:

(1) the cost of establishing, acquiring, or leasing the telephone exchange facilities
and an explanation of how these costs will be paid;

(2) detailed projected income statements for each of the first five years of operation of
the telephone exchange. In addition to including revenue and expense detail, the projected
income statements must also include allowances for depreciation, and a maintenance and
upgrade plan for the telephone exchange to avoid technological obsolescence;

(3) a five-year projected capital budget; and

(4) the costs incurred by the municipality in preparing the feasibility report and a
list of the individuals or firms paid by the municipality for assistance in studying the
feasibility of the project.

(b) Not less than 60 days before the referendum, the municipality must hold a public
hearing regarding the feasibility report. Public notice of the hearing must be given to
inform the public of the availability of the feasibility report for inspection and copying.

(c) The ballot issue for the referendum must include, in addition to any other
information required by law, a statement of the maximum costs disclosed under paragraph
(a), clauses (1) and (2), to construct, acquire, and operate the telephone exchange, which
costs shall not be exceeded without voter approval in another election.

Subd. 4.


A municipality shall not discriminate in favor of its
own telephone exchange system by granting itself more favorable or less burdensome
terms and conditions than a competitive telephone exchange operator with respect to the
access and use of public rights-of-way, municipally owned or controlled conduit, towers,
telephone poles, and permitting fees charged for access to the municipally owned and
managed facilities. A municipality operating a telephone exchange under this section shall:

(1) approve or reject all permit applications seeking access to the facilities from a
private telecommunications service provider within 30 days of submission; and

(2) deny a permit application only for cause and must provide a written explanation
for any denial.

A permit not acted on within 30 days by a municipality operating a telephone
exchange under this section shall be considered approved.

Subd. 5.

Competitive bidding required.

All agreements between a municipality
and any firm or individual related to a feasibility study, construction or acquisition, and
operation of a telephone exchange, is a "contract" as defined under section 471.345,
subdivision 2.


This section is effective the day following final enactment.

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8
1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.22 2.23 2.24 2.25 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 2.30 2.31 2.32 2.33 2.34 2.35 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20

700 State Office Building, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., St. Paul, MN 55155 ♦ Phone: (651) 296-2868 ♦ TTY: 1-800-627-3529 ♦ Fax: (651) 296-0569