Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

HF 2646

1st Engrossment - 79th Legislature (1995 - 1996) Posted on 12/15/2009 12:00am

KEY: stricken = removed, old language.
underscored = added, new language.

Bill Text Versions

Engrossments
1st Engrossment Posted on 08/14/1998

Current Version - 1st Engrossment

  1.1                          A bill for an act 
  1.2             relating to health; establishing a process for 
  1.3             assessing proposed health coverage mandates; 
  1.4             appropriating money; proposing coding for new law in 
  1.5             Minnesota Statutes, chapter 62A. 
  1.6   BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 
  1.7      Section 1.  [62A.310] [ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED HEALTH 
  1.8   COVERAGE MANDATES.] 
  1.9      Subdivision 1.  [DEFINITIONS.] For the purpose of this 
  1.10  section, the following terms have the meanings given them: 
  1.11     (1) "mandated health benefit proposal" means a proposal 
  1.12  that would statutorily require a health plan to do the following:
  1.13     (i) provide coverage, or increase the amount of coverage, 
  1.14  for the treatment of a particular disease, condition, or other 
  1.15  health care need; or 
  1.16     (ii) provide coverage, or increase the amount of coverage, 
  1.17  of a particular type of health care treatment or service or of 
  1.18  equipment, supplies, or drugs used in connection with a health 
  1.19  care treatment or service; 
  1.20     (2) "commissioners" means the commissioners of commerce and 
  1.21  health; and 
  1.22     (3) "health plan" means a health plan as defined in section 
  1.23  62A.011, subdivision 3, but includes coverage listed in section 
  1.24  62A.011, subdivision 3, clauses (7) and (10), within the 
  1.25  definition. 
  2.1      Subd. 2.  [HEALTH COVERAGE MANDATE ASSESSMENT PROCESS 
  2.2   ESTABLISHED.] The commissioners shall establish and administer a 
  2.3   process for the review, assessment, and cost benefit analysis of 
  2.4   mandated health benefit proposals.  The purpose of the process 
  2.5   is to provide the legislature with a cost benefit analysis of 
  2.6   the social and financial impact of each mandated health benefit 
  2.7   proposal before legislative action is taken.  
  2.8      Subd. 3.  [REQUESTS FOR ASSESSMENT.] Whenever a legislative 
  2.9   measure containing a mandated health benefit proposal is 
  2.10  introduced as a bill or offered as an amendment to a bill, or is 
  2.11  likely to be introduced or offered as an amendment, the chairs 
  2.12  of the standing committees having jurisdiction over the proposal 
  2.13  may request that the commissioners complete an assessment of the 
  2.14  proposal.  If multiple requests are received, the commissioners 
  2.15  shall consult with the chairs of the standing legislative 
  2.16  committees having jurisdiction over mandated health benefit 
  2.17  proposals to prioritize the requests. 
  2.18     Subd. 4.  [ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED MANDATES; REPORT TO THE 
  2.19  LEGISLATURE.] The commissioners shall conduct an assessment of 
  2.20  each mandated health benefit proposal selected for assessment 
  2.21  and submit a report to the legislature in a timely manner, but 
  2.22  no later than 180 days after the request.  The commissioners 
  2.23  shall, in consultation with the chairs of the standing 
  2.24  committees having jurisdiction over the proposal, develop a 
  2.25  reporting date for each proposal to be assessed.  The 
  2.26  commissioners may seek the assistance and advice of consultants, 
  2.27  contractors, researchers, or other persons or organizations with 
  2.28  relevant expertise and may request advice or analysis from the 
  2.29  health technology advisory committee. 
  2.30     Subd. 5.  [NONLEGISLATIVE SOLUTIONS.] If, in the course of 
  2.31  reviewing a mandated health benefit proposal, the commissioners 
  2.32  determine that the problem can be solved without legislation 
  2.33  through the exercise of existing state regulatory authority or 
  2.34  other actions, the commissioners may take action to resolve the 
  2.35  problem.  The commissioners shall inform the chairs of the 
  2.36  standing committees having jurisdiction over the mandated health 
  3.1   benefit proposal of any nonlegislative action taken. 
  3.2      Subd. 6.  [PUBLIC HEARINGS.] The commissioners shall 
  3.3   solicit comments and recommendations on a mandated health 
  3.4   benefit proposal from any interested persons and organizations 
  3.5   and may schedule public hearings.  The commissioners shall also 
  3.6   seek the comments and recommendations of representatives of 
  3.7   health care consumers and employers.  The commissioners shall 
  3.8   summarize the various comments and recommendations received in 
  3.9   the commissioners' report to the legislature. 
  3.10     Sec. 2.  [APPROPRIATION.] 
  3.11     $....... is appropriated from the state government special 
  3.12  revenue fund to the commissioners of commerce and health for the 
  3.13  purpose of establishing and administering the review process 
  3.14  established in section 1. 
  3.15     Sec. 3.  [EFFECTIVE DATE.] 
  3.16     Section 1 is effective the day following final enactment.