Minnesota Legislature
SF 2824
as introduced - 85th Legislature (2007 - 2008) Posted on 12/15/2009 12:00am
1.7 1.8
1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12
2.13
2.14 2.15
2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.22 2.23 2.24 2.25 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 2.30 2.31 2.32 2.33 2.34 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 3.24 3.25 3.26 3.27 3.28 3.29 3.30 3.31 3.32 3.33 3.34 3.35 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 4.21 4.22 4.23 4.24 4.25 4.26 4.27 4.28 4.29 4.30 4.31 4.32 4.33 4.34 4.35 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 5.16 5.17 5.18 5.19 5.20 5.21
5.22
5.23 5.24 5.25 5.26 5.27 5.28 5.29 5.30 5.31 5.32 5.33 5.34 5.35 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 6.19 6.20 6.21 6.22 6.23 6.24 6.25 6.26 6.27 6.28 6.29 6.30 6.31 6.32
6.33
6.34 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13
7.14
A bill for an act
relating to transportation; providing an alternative compensation and settlement
process for victims of the I-35W bridge collapse; changing the effective date of
an increase in individual damage caps for state tort claims; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 3.736, subdivision 4.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
ARTICLE 1
STATE TORT CLAIMS
Section 1.
Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 3.736, subdivision 4, is amended to read:
Subd. 4.
Limits.
The total liability of the state and its employees acting within the
scope of their employment on any tort claim shall not exceed:
(a) $300,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission and
$300,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims arising before deleted text begin Januarydeleted text end new text begin Augustnew text end
1, deleted text begin 2008deleted text end new text begin 2007new text end ;
(b) $400,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission and
$400,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims arising on or after deleted text begin Januarydeleted text end new text begin Augustnew text end
1, deleted text begin 2008deleted text end new text begin 2007new text end , and before July 1, 2009;
(c) $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission and
$500,000 to any claimant in any other case, for claims arising on or after July 1, 2009;
(d) $750,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence, for claims
arising on or after January 1, 1998, and before January 1, 2000;
(e) $1,000,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence, for
claims arising on or after January 1, 2000, and before January 1, 2008;
(f) $1,200,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence, for
claims arising on or after January 1, 2008, and before July 1, 2009; or
(g) $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence, for
claims arising on or after July 1, 2009.
If the amount awarded to or settled upon multiple claimants exceeds the applicable
limit under clause (d), (e), (f), or (g), any party may apply to the district court to apportion
to each claimant a proper share of the amount available under the applicable limit under
clause (d), (e), (f), or (g). The share apportioned to each claimant shall be in the proportion
that the ratio of the award or settlement bears to the aggregate awards and settlements for
all claims arising out of the occurrence.
The limitation imposed by this subdivision on individual claimants includes damages
claimed for loss of services or loss of support arising out of the same tort.
new text begin EFFECTIVE DATE. new text end
new text begin
This section is effective retroactively from August 1, 2007.
new text end
ARTICLE 2
I-35W BRIDGE COLLAPSE
Section 1. new text begin COMPENSATION FOR VICTIMS OF I-35W BRIDGE COLLAPSE.
new text end
new text begin Subdivision 1. new text end
new text begin Findings. new text end
new text begin
(a) The legislature finds that the collapse of the Interstate
Highway 35W bridge over the Mississippi River in Minneapolis on August 1, 2007,
was a catastrophe of historic proportions. The bridge was the third-busiest in the state,
carrying over 140,000 cars per day. Its collapse killed 13 people and injured more than
100. No other state-owned structure has ever fallen with such devastating physical and
psychological impact on so many.
new text end
new text begin
(b) The methods used by the legislature to compensate victims of natural disasters
are not appropriate for this catastrophe. In this catastrophe, leaving victims the sole option
of pursuing relief for their injuries through the courts is not in the best interests of either
the state or the victims. Legal claims of this nature are too complex, uncertain, time
consuming, and expensive for all parties involved. In addition, the current aggregate tort
claims limit contained in Minnesota Statutes, section 3.736, subdivision 4, paragraph (e),
unduly limits the potential relief available to victims due to the unique circumstances of
the bridge collapse.
new text end
new text begin
(c) The establishment of an alternative compensation process for victims of the
bridge collapse furthers the public interest by providing a remedy for victims while
avoiding the uncertainty of potentially complex and protracted litigation to resolve the
issue of the liability of the state and its employees for damages incurred by victims.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 2. new text end
new text begin Definitions. new text end
new text begin
For purposes of this article:
new text end
new text begin
(a) "Damages" means damages that are compensable under state tort law and
damages for wrongful death that are compensable under Minnesota Statutes, section
573.02. Damages do not include punitive damages or attorney fees.
new text end
new text begin
(b) "Emergency relief fund" means the I-35W bridge emergency relief fund created
by the state on November 30, 2007.
new text end
new text begin
(c) "Municipality" has the meaning given in Minnesota Statutes, section 466.01.
new text end
new text begin
(d) "Panel" means the special master panel created under subdivision 3.
new text end
new text begin
(e) "State" has the meaning given in Minnesota Statutes, section 3.732.
new text end
new text begin
(f) "Victim" means a natural person who was present on the I-35W bridge at the time
of the collapse. Victim includes the parent or legal guardian of a victim who is under
18 years of age; a legally appointed representative of a victim; or the surviving spouse
or next of kin of a victim who would be entitled to bring an action under Minnesota
Statutes, section 573.02.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 3. new text end
new text begin Special master panel; administration. new text end
new text begin
(a) The chief justice of the
Supreme Court shall establish a special master panel to consider claims; make offers of
settlement; and enter into settlement agreements with victims on behalf of the state. The
panel must consist of three attorneys, at least one of whom must be a retired judge of the
appellate or district courts of this state. Nonjudicial members of the panel must have
experience in legal issues involving the settlement of tort claims and the determination of
damages. The chief justice shall designate a member of the panel who is a retired judge
to serve as chair of the panel. The chief justice shall determine the pay and expenses
to be received by a member of the panel.
new text end
new text begin
(b) Within the limits of available appropriations, the state court administrator,
in consultation with the panel, shall hire employees necessary to assist the panel in
performing its duties under this section. Employees are in the unclassified state civil
service. The panel may also use current state employees or consultants who are under a
contract with the state to assist the panel in processing claims under this section.
new text end
new text begin
(c) The panel may adopt procedures, rules, and forms for considering claims;
making offers of settlement; and entering into settlement agreements. These procedures,
rules, and forms are exempt from Minnesota Statutes, chapter 14, including Minnesota
Statutes, section 14.386.
new text end
new text begin
(d) The state court administrator shall forward documentation of salaries, expenses,
and administrative costs under this subdivision to the commissioner of finance for
payment of those amounts.
new text end
new text begin
(e) Members of the panel and employees and contractors acting under the direction
of the panel are absolutely immune from civil liability for any act or omission occurring
within the scope of the performance of their duties under this section.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 4. new text end
new text begin Claims; consideration, settlement, and payment. new text end
new text begin
(a) The panel shall
consider claims; make offers of settlement; and enter into settlement agreements with
victims as provided in this section. In order to be eligible to receive an offer of settlement
or enter into a settlement agreement under this section, a victim must file a claim with the
panel within six months after the effective date of this section. Any offer of settlement
must be made by the panel within one year after the effective date of this section.
new text end
new text begin
(b) The amount of an offer of settlement under this section must be based on the
total damages incurred by the victim, less:
new text end
new text begin
(1) a collateral source reduction calculated in the manner provided for in Minnesota
Statutes, section 548.36;
new text end
new text begin
(2) any payment made to the victim from the emergency relief fund; and
new text end
new text begin
(3) any payments made or required to be made to the victim by a third-party
tortfeasor under the terms of an existing settlement or other agreement with the victim
or a final judgment in favor of the victim concerning claims of the victim that relate to,
involve, or arise out of the bridge collapse.
new text end
new text begin
The amount of an offer of settlement or payment required by a settlement agreement
must not exceed $400,000 per victim. Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 3.736,
subdivision 4, clause (e), there is no limit on the total amount of payments made to all
victims under this section, subject to the availability of appropriations for this purpose.
new text end
new text begin
(c) A victim who accepts an offer of settlement from the panel must agree in writing
and in a form developed by the panel to release the state and every municipality of this
state and their employees from liability for damages arising from the bridge collapse and
to cooperate with the state in pursuing claims the state may have against any other party.
The release must also provide that the victim will indemnify the state, a municipality, and
their employees for any claim of contribution or indemnity, or both, made by other persons
against the state, a municipality, and their employees and the release will satisfy any
judgment obtained by the victim against the state in an action against other persons to the
extent of the release, if the claim or judgment relates in any way to a claim of the victim
arising from the bridge collapse. The release must provide for the subrogation interest of
the state under section 2, subdivision 5.
new text end
new text begin
(d) The panel shall promptly forward to the commissioner of finance documentation
of each settlement agreement that has been entered into under this section. The
commissioner of finance shall pay the agreed amount within 30 days after receiving the
documentation.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 5. new text end
new text begin Effect and finality of offers and settlement agreements. new text end
new text begin
(a) An offer
of settlement made to a victim under this section is considered for all purposes to be an
offer to the victim to settle a legal claim.
new text end
new text begin
(b) A determination by the panel regarding an offer of settlement or settlement
agreement is final and not subject to judicial review.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 6. new text end
new text begin Data. new text end
new text begin
Data on individuals collected or created because a victim files
a claim or accepts or rejects an offer of settlement under this section are private data on
individuals as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 13.02, subdivision 12, except for the:
new text end
new text begin
(1) name of the victim; and
new text end
new text begin
(2) terms of any written settlement agreement between the victim and the state.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 7. new text end
new text begin Election to proceed in district court. new text end
new text begin
(a) A victim may elect not to file
a claim with the panel or not to accept an offer of settlement from the panel. A victim
who elects not to file a claim with the panel or not to accept an offer of settlement has
not waived any legal rights that may be asserted against the state or a municipality and
may proceed with a claim in district court.
new text end
new text begin
(b) If a victim elects not to accept an offer of settlement, the state or a municipality
may not use any data provided by the victim to the panel in a subsequent legal proceeding.
The state or a municipality may obtain information, including data provided to the panel,
through discovery or other legal processes.
new text end
new text begin EFFECTIVE DATE. new text end
new text begin
This section is effective the day following final enactment.
new text end
Sec. 2. new text begin EFFECT OF SPECIAL COMPENSATION PROCESS; RELATIONSHIP
TO OTHER LAW.
new text end
new text begin Subdivision 1. new text end
new text begin No state liability or duty created. new text end
new text begin
The establishment of the special
compensation process under section 1 and the emergency relief fund, and an offer of
settlement or a settlement agreement is not an admission of liability by the state or a
municipality and their employees and does not establish a duty of the state, a municipality,
or their employees to compensate victims. The creation and funding of the compensation
process under this act or an offer of settlement or settlement agreement is not admissible
in a judicial or administrative proceeding to establish liability or a legal duty.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 2. new text end
new text begin Payments as additional compensation. new text end
new text begin
Payments made under section 1
or from the emergency relief fund are intended to supplement and be in addition to any
payments under section 1 or from the emergency relief fund required to be made by a
third party under law or contract. Payments are not a collateral source for purposes of
Minnesota Statutes, section 62A.096 or 548.36 or other law providing for the reduction of
a damage award or the amount of benefits recoverable by a victim from a third party.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 3. new text end
new text begin Payments from other sources. new text end
new text begin
Notwithstanding any statutory or common
law or agreement to the contrary, a person required to make payments, including
future payments, to a victim may not eliminate or reduce those payments as a result of
compensation paid to the victim under section 1 or from the emergency relief fund or as a
result of the victim's release of claims against the state, a municipality, or their employees
under section 1.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 4. new text end
new text begin No third-party subrogation or recovery. new text end
new text begin
Notwithstanding any statutory
or common law to the contrary, no person who has paid benefits or compensation to or
on behalf of a victim has any right of recovery, through subrogation or otherwise, with
respect to making a claim or recovering from payments made under section 1 or from
the emergency relief fund.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 5. new text end
new text begin Third-party reimbursement of state; right of subrogation. new text end
new text begin
(a)
Notwithstanding any statutory or common law to the contrary, the state is entitled to
recover from any third party, including an agent, contractor, or vendor retained by the
state, for payments made from the emergency relief fund or under section 1 to the extent
the third party caused or contributed to the bridge collapse.
new text end
new text begin
(b) Notwithstanding any statutory or common law to the contrary, the state is
subrogated to all potential claims against third-party tortfeasors of a victim receiving
payment from the emergency relief fund or under section 1 to the extent the claims relate
to, involve, or arise out of the bridge collapse. The subrogation right of the state under this
subdivision is limited to the amount paid to the victim from the emergency relief fund
and under section 1. The rights of the state under this subdivision are in addition to other
remedies, claims, and rights relating to the bridge collapse that the state may have against
other persons for the recovery of money.
new text end
new text begin Subd. 6. new text end
new text begin
Amounts not considered for purposes of limit on government tort
liability.
new text end
new text begin
Payments made to victims under section 1 or from the emergency relief fund
are not to be considered in calculating the limit on tort claims in civil actions against the
state arising out of the bridge collapse for purposes of Minnesota Statutes, section 3.736,
subdivision 4, clause (e), or a municipality arising out of the bridge collapse for purposes
of Minnesota Statutes, section 466.04, subdivision 1, clause (5).
new text end
new text begin EFFECTIVE DATE. new text end
new text begin
This section is effective the day following final enactment.
new text end
Sec. 3. new text begin APPROPRIATIONS.
new text end
new text begin
(a) $....... is appropriated from the ....... fund to the commissioner of finance to make
payments under settlement agreements entered into by the panel under section 1. This
appropriation is available until all claims eligible for payment under section 1 have been
paid. The legislature intends to fully fund the settlement agreements. If it appears to the
commissioner of finance that this appropriation may be insufficient to pay all agreed upon
settlement amounts, the commissioner shall promptly report to the chairs of the senate
Committee on Finance and the house of representatives Committee on Ways and Means
the estimated amount of the insufficiency and the estimated date when the appropriation
will be exhausted.
new text end
new text begin
(b) $....... is appropriated from the general fund to the commissioner of finance
to pay salaries, expenses, and administrative costs associated with making offers of
settlement and entering into settlement agreements under section 1. This appropriation
is available until June 30, 2009.
new text end
new text begin EFFECTIVE DATE. new text end
new text begin
This section is effective the day following final enactment.
new text end