2006 Minnesota Statutes

237.73 OBTAINING SERVICE BY FRAUD; INJUNCTION.
    Subdivision 1. Equitable relief. Whenever it appears that a person is engaged in an
act that constitutes or will constitute a violation of section 609.893, a representative of a
telecommunications provider or a person harmed by an alleged violation of section 609.893 may
begin a civil proceeding in a district court to enjoin the violation and may petition the court to
issue an order for the discontinuance of telephone service.
    Subd. 2. Venue. An action under this section must be brought in the county in which subject
matter of the action, or some part of it, is located or found, and must be commenced by the filing
of a complaint that must be verified by affidavit.
    Subd. 3. Temporary restraining order. If it is shown to the satisfaction of the court, either
by verified complaint or affidavit, that a person is engaged in an act that constitutes a violation
of section 609.893, the court shall issue a temporary restraining order to abate and prevent the
continuance or recurrence of the act. Notice of the complaint shall be given and a hearing on the
issuance of a temporary restraining order shall be held under the Rules of Civil Procedure. The
court shall direct the county sheriff to seize and keep until further order of the court any device
that is being used in violation of section 609.893. The temporary restraining order expires after
ten days.
    Subd. 4. Permanent injunction. The court may issue a permanent injunction to restrain,
abate, or prevent the continuance or recurrence of the violation of section 609.893. The court may
grant declaratory relief, mandatory orders, or any other relief it judges necessary to accomplish
the purposes of the injunction. The court may keep jurisdiction of the case for the purpose of
enforcing its orders.
    Subd. 5. Discontinuance of telephone service. If it is shown to the satisfaction of the court,
by affidavit, that a person is engaged in an act that constitutes a violation of section 609.893,
the court may issue an order that shall be promptly served upon the person in whose name the
telecommunications device is listed, requiring the party, within a reasonable time to be fixed by
the court but not exceeding 48 hours from the time of service of the petition on said party, to
show cause before the judge why telephone service should not promptly be discontinued. At the
hearing, the burden of proof is on the complainant.
    Subd. 6. Disconnect order. Upon a finding by the court that the telecommunications device
is being used or has been used in violation of section 609.893, the court shall issue an order
requiring the telephone company that is rendering service over the device to disconnect the
service. Upon receipt of the order, that shall be served upon an officer of the telephone company
by the sheriff of the county in which the telecommunications device is installed or by a duly
authorized deputy, the telephone company shall proceed promptly to disconnect and remove the
service and discontinue all telephone service until further order of the court.
    Subd. 7. Immunity. No telephone company is liable for any damages, penalty, or forfeiture,
whether civil or criminal, for an act performed in compliance with an order issued by the court.
History: 1990 c 494 s 1; 1990 c 612 s 9