Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

Office of the Revisor of Statutes

103G.2243 LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE WETLAND PROTECTION AND
MANAGEMENT PLANS.
    Subdivision 1. General requirements; notice and participation. (a) As an alternative to the
rules adopted under section 103G.2242, subdivision 1, and the public value criteria established or
approved under section 103B.3355, a comprehensive wetland protection and management plan
may be developed by a local government unit, or one or more local government units operating
under a joint powers agreement, provided that:
(1) a notice is made at the beginning of the planning process to the board, the commissioner
of natural resources, the Pollution Control Agency, the commissioner of agriculture, local
government units, and local citizens to actively participate in the development of the plan; and
(2) the plan is implemented by ordinance as part of the local government's official controls
under chapter 394, for a county; chapter 462, for a city; chapter 366, for a town; and by rules
adopted under chapter 103D, for a watershed district; and chapter 103B, for a watershed
management organization.
(b) An organization that is invited to participate in the development of the local plan, but
declines to do so and fails to participate or to provide written comments during the local review
process, waives the right during board review to submit comments, except comments concerning
consistency of the plan with laws and rules administered by that agency. In determining the
merit of an agency comment, the board shall consider the involvement of the agency in the
development of the local plan.
    Subd. 2. Plan contents. A comprehensive wetland protection and management plan may:
(1) provide for classification of wetlands in the plan area based on:
(i) an inventory of wetlands in the plan area;
(ii) an assessment of the wetland functions listed in section 103B.3355, using a methodology
chosen by the Technical Evaluation Panel from one of the methodologies established or approved
by the board under that section; and
(iii) the resulting public values;
(2) vary application of the sequencing standards in section 103G.222, subdivision 1,
paragraph (b), for projects based on the classification and criteria set forth in the plan;
(3) vary the replacement standards of section 103G.222, subdivision 1, paragraphs (e) and
(f), based on the classification and criteria set forth in the plan, for specific wetland impacts
provided there is no net loss of public values within the area subject to the plan, and so long as:
(i) in a 50 to 80 percent area, a minimum acreage requirement of one acre of replaced
wetland for each acre of drained or filled wetland requiring replacement is met within the area
subject to the plan; and
(ii) in a less than 50 percent area, a minimum acreage requirement of two acres of replaced
wetland for each acre of drained or filled wetland requiring replacement is met within the area
subject to the plan, except that replacement for the amount above a 1:1 ratio can be accomplished
as described in section 103G.2242, subdivision 12;
(4) in a greater than 80 percent area, allow replacement credit, based on the classification
and criteria set forth in the plan, for any project that increases the public value of wetlands,
including activities on adjacent upland acres; and
(5) in a greater than 80 percent area, based on the classification and criteria set forth in the
plan, expand the application of the exemptions in section 103G.2241, subdivision 1, paragraph
(a), clause (4), to also include nonagricultural land, provided there is no net loss of wetland values.
    Subd. 3. Board review and approval; mediation; judicial review. (a) The plan is deemed
approved 60 days after the local government submits the final plan to the board, unless the board
disagrees with the plan as provided in paragraph (d).
(b) The board may not disapprove a plan if the board determines the plan meets the
requirements of this section.
(c) In its review of a plan, the board shall advise the local government unit of those elements
of the plan that are more restrictive than state law and rules for purposes of section 103G.237,
subdivision 5
.
(d) If the board disagrees with the plan or any elements of the plan, the board shall, in
writing, notify the local government of the plan deficiencies and suggested changes. The board
shall include in the response to the local government the scientific justification, if applicable, for
the board's concerns with the plan. Upon receipt of the board's concerns with the plan, the local
government has 60 days to revise the plan and resubmit the plan to the board for reconsideration,
or the local government may request a hearing before the board. The board shall hold a hearing
within the boundaries of the jurisdiction of the local government within 60 days of the request
for hearing. After the hearing, the board shall, within 60 days, prepare a report of its decision
and inform the local government.
(e) If, after the hearing, the board and local government disagree on the plan, the board shall,
within 60 days, initiate mediation through a neutral party. If the board and local government
unit agree in writing not to use mediation or the mediation does not result in a resolution of the
differences between the parties, then the board may commence a declaratory judgment action
in the district court of the county where the local government unit is located. If the board does
not commence a declaratory judgment action within the applicable 60-day period, the plan
is deemed approved.
(f) The declaratory judgment action must be commenced within 60 days after the date of the
written agreement not to use mediation or 60 days after conclusion of the mediation. If the board
commences a declaratory judgment action, the district court shall review the board's record of
decision and the record of decision of the local government unit. The district court shall affirm the
plan if it meets the requirements of this section.
    Subd. 4. Effective date; replacement decisions. (a) The plan becomes effective as provided
in subdivision 3, paragraphs (d) to (f), and after adoption of the plan into the official controls of
the local government.
(b) After the effective date of a plan, a local government unit shall make replacement
decisions consistent with the plan.
    Subd. 5. Plan amendments. Amendments to the plan become effective upon completion of
the same process required for the original plan.
    Subd. 6. Water planning processes apply. Except as otherwise provided for in this section,
all other requirements relating to development of the plan must be consistent with the water plan
processes under sections 103B.231 and 103B.311.
History: 1996 c 462 s 33; 1997 c 2 s 9; 1998 c 312 s 5; 2001 c 7 s 26

Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes