Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

HF 617

as introduced - 89th Legislature (2015 - 2016) Posted on 02/05/2015 01:53pm

KEY: stricken = removed, old language.
underscored = added, new language.

Bill Text Versions

Engrossments
Introduction Posted on 02/05/2015

Current Version - as introduced

Line numbers 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19

A bill for an act
relating to environment; requiring independent peer review of certain water
quality work; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 115.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1.

new text begin [115.035] INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW OF WATER QUALITY
STUDIES AND STANDARDS; LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL.
new text end

new text begin (a) For the purposes of this section:
new text end

new text begin (1) "independent peer review" means a peer review conducted by an expert in an
area related to the work being reviewed who was not directly or indirectly involved with
the work conducted or contracted by the agency and who is not currently employed by
the agency;
new text end

new text begin (2) "proposal" means a proposal to change water quality standards or other regulatory
guidance, including reinterpretations of water quality standards and other changes that will
impact national pollutant discharge elimination system permits or storm water permits; and
new text end

new text begin (3) "study" means a study, an analysis, or other technical or scientific work that was
conducted, contracted, or otherwise relied upon by the agency and that is or will be used
to support or otherwise inform a regulatory decision-making process.
new text end

new text begin (b) The commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency shall ensure that a water
quality study or proposal is subject to an independent peer review if the study or proposal:
new text end

new text begin (1) supports or proposes a change with an estimated financial impact to affected
permittees of $50,000,000 or more, in total, within the first five years of implementation;
new text end

new text begin (2) supports or proposes a significant new precedent, model, or methodology;
new text end

new text begin (3) addresses a significant controversial issue;
new text end

new text begin (4) supports or proposes a change that would significantly impact another state
agency; or
new text end

new text begin (5) has the potential to significantly impact the agency's resources.
new text end

new text begin (c) The commissioner shall notify the chairs and ranking minority members of the
house of representatives and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over the
environment and natural resources when an independent peer review is required under this
section and the factors listed in paragraph (b) that require the independent peer review.
new text end

new text begin (d) The commissioner shall ensure that a study or proposal subject to an independent
peer review under this section is peer reviewed in accordance with the guidance contained
in the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Peer Review Handbook. As part
of the independent peer review process, the commissioner shall allow for public comment,
including written and oral public comments, on the study or proposal.
new text end

new text begin (e) A proposal to change a water quality standard or other water quality rule
that is required to be peer reviewed under paragraph (b), clause (1), or that has an
estimated impact to a single permittee of $5,000,000 or more within the first five years of
implementation must be approved by the legislature prior to implementation.
new text end

new text begin (f) This section applies to proposals and studies developed under the authority and
duties prescribed under this chapter and, with respect to the pollution of waters of the
state, chapter 116.
new text end