Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

SF 1567

2nd Engrossment - 87th Legislature (2011 - 2012) Posted on 02/29/2012 03:58pm

KEY: stricken = removed, old language.
underscored = added, new language.
Line numbers 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12
1.13 1.14
1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.26 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20
2.21 2.22 2.23 2.24 2.25 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 2.30
2.31 2.32 2.33 2.34 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 3.22 3.23 3.24 3.25 3.26 3.27
3.28 3.29 3.30 3.31 3.32 3.33
3.34
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 4.21 4.22 4.23 4.24 4.25 4.26 4.27 4.28 4.29 4.30 4.31 4.32 4.33 4.34 4.35 4.36 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 5.16 5.17 5.18 5.19 5.20 5.21 5.22 5.23 5.24 5.25 5.26 5.27 5.28 5.29 5.30 5.31 5.32 5.33 5.34 5.35 5.36 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8
6.9 6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 6.19 6.20 6.21 6.22 6.23 6.24 6.25 6.26 6.27 6.28 6.29 6.30 6.31 6.32 6.33 6.34 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 7.11 7.12 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.16
7.17 7.18 7.19 7.20 7.21 7.22 7.23 7.24
7.25 7.26 7.27 7.28
7.29 7.30 7.31 7.32 7.33 8.1 8.2
8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7
8.8 8.9 8.10 8.11 8.12 8.13
8.14 8.15 8.16 8.17 8.18 8.19 8.20 8.21 8.22 8.23 8.24 8.25 8.26 8.27 8.28 8.29 8.30 8.31 8.32 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.10 9.11 9.12 9.13 9.14 9.15 9.16 9.17 9.18 9.19 9.20 9.21 9.22 9.23
9.24 9.25
9.26 9.27
9.28 9.29 9.30 9.31 9.32 9.33 9.34 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 10.10 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18
10.19 10.20 10.21 10.22 10.23 10.24 10.25 10.26 10.27 10.28 10.29 10.30 10.31 10.32 10.33 10.34 10.35 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.10 11.11 11.12 11.13 11.14 11.15 11.16 11.17 11.18 11.19 11.20 11.21 11.22 11.23 11.24 11.25 11.26 11.27 11.28 11.29 11.30 11.31 11.32 11.33 11.34 11.35 11.36 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 12.7 12.8 12.9 12.10 12.11 12.12 12.13 12.14 12.15 12.16 12.17 12.18 12.19 12.20 12.21 12.22 12.23 12.24 12.25 12.26 12.27 12.28 12.29 12.30 12.31 12.32 12.33 12.34 12.35 12.36 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 13.7 13.8 13.9 13.10 13.11 13.12 13.13 13.14 13.15 13.16 13.17 13.18 13.19 13.20 13.21
13.22 13.23 13.24 13.25 13.26 13.27 13.28 13.29 13.30 13.31 13.32 13.33 13.34 13.35 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5

A bill for an act
relating to environment; providing for permitting efficiency; modifying
environmental review requirements; eliminating conservation rate structure
requirement; modifying terms for certain permits; appropriating money;
amending Minnesota Statutes 2010, sections 41A.10, subdivision 1; 84.027,
by adding a subdivision; 103G.291, subdivision 3; 115.03, by adding a
subdivision; 116.07, subdivision 4a; 116D.04, by adding a subdivision; 116J.03,
by adding subdivisions; 116J.035, by adding a subdivision; Minnesota Statutes
2011 Supplement, sections 84.027, subdivision 14a; 116.03, subdivision 2b;
116D.04, subdivision 2a; repealing Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 103G.291,
subdivision 4.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

ARTICLE 1

PERMITTING

Section 1.

Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 84.027, subdivision 14a,
is amended to read:


Subd. 14a.

Permitting efficiency.

(a) It is the goal of the state that environmental
and resource management permits be issued or denied within 150 days of the submission
of a substantially completed permit application. The commissioner of natural resources
shall establish management systems designed to achieve the goal.

(b) The commissioner shall prepare semiannual permitting efficiency reports that
include statistics on meeting the goal in paragraph (a). The reports are due February 1
and August 1 each year. For permit applications that have not met the goal, the report
must state the reasons for not meeting the goal, steps that will be taken to complete action
on the application, and the expected timeline. In stating the reasons for not meeting the
goal, the commissioner shall separately identify delays caused by the responsiveness of
the proposer, lack of staff, scientific or technical disagreements, or the level of public
engagement. The report must specify the number of days from initial submission of the
application to the day of determination that the application is complete. The report for
August 1 each year must aggregate the data for the year and assess whether program
or system changes are necessary to achieve the goal. The report must be posted on the
department's Web site and submitted to the governor and the chairs and ranking minority
members of the house of representatives and senate committees having jurisdiction over
natural resources policy and finance.

(c) The commissioner shall allow electronic submission of environmental review
and permit documents to the department.

(d) Beginning July 1, 2011, within 30 business days of application for a permit
subject to paragraph (a), the commissioner of natural resources shall notify the project
proposer, in writing, of deleted text beginwhether or not the permit application is complete enough for
processing. If the permit is incomplete, the commissioner must identify where
deleted text endnew text begin anynew text end
deficiencies deleted text beginexistdeleted text end and advise the applicant on how they can be remedied. deleted text beginA resubmittal of
the application begins a new 30-day review period. If the commissioner fails to notify the
project proposer of completeness within 30 business days, the application is deemed to be
substantially complete and subject to the 150-day permitting review period in paragraph
(a) from the date it was submitted.
deleted text end This paragraph does not apply to an application for a
permit that is subject to a grant or loan agreement under chapter 446A.

Sec. 2.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 84.027, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:


new text begin Subd. 14b. new text end

new text begin Irrevocability or suspensions of permits. new text end

new text begin If, by July 1 of an
odd-numbered year, a biennial appropriation law has not been enacted for the department
to fund programs to protect the air, water, and land resources of the state, until the biennial
appropriation law is enacted, permits granted may not be terminated or suspended for the
term of the permits, nor shall they expire or not be renewed without the consent of the
permittee, except for breach or nonperformance of any condition of the permit by the
permittee that is an imminent threat to impair or destroy the environment or injure the
health, safety, or welfare of the citizens of the state.
new text end

Sec. 3.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 103G.291, subdivision 3, is amended to read:


Subd. 3.

Water supply plans; demand reduction.

(a) Every public water supplier
serving more than 1,000 people must submit a water supply plan to the commissioner
for approval by January 1, 1996. In accordance with guidelines developed by the
commissioner, the plan must address projected demands, adequacy of the water supply
system and planned improvements, existing and future water sources, natural resource
impacts or limitations, emergency preparedness, water conservation, supply and demand
reduction measures, and allocation priorities that are consistent with section 103G.261.
Public water suppliers must update their plan and, upon notification, submit it to the
commissioner for approval every ten years.

(b) The water supply plan in paragraph (a) is required for all communities in the
metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, with a municipal water supply system
and is a required element of the local comprehensive plan required under section 473.859.
Water supply plans or updates submitted after December 31, 2008, must be consistent
with the metropolitan area master water supply plan required under section 473.1565,
subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (2).

(c) Public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people must employ water
use demand reduction measuresdeleted text begin, including a conservation rate structure, as defined in
subdivision 4, paragraph (a), unless exempted under subdivision 4, paragraph (c),
deleted text end before
requesting approval from the commissioner of health under section 144.383, paragraph
(a)
, to construct a public water supply well or requesting an increase in the authorized
volume of appropriation. deleted text beginDemand reduction measures must include evaluation of
conservation rate structures and a public education program that may include a toilet
and showerhead retrofit program.
deleted text end

(d) Public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people must submit records
that indicate the number of connections and amount of use by customer category and
volume of water unaccounted for with the annual report of water use required under
section 103G.281, subdivision 3.

(e) For the purposes of this section, "public water supplier" means an entity
that owns, manages, or operates a public water supply, as defined in section 144.382,
subdivision 4
.

Sec. 4.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 115.03, is amended by adding a subdivision to
read:


new text begin Subd. 8b. new text end

new text begin Permit duration; state disposal system permits; animal feeding
operations.
new text end

new text begin State disposal system permits that are issued without a national pollutant
discharge elimination system permit to animal feeding operations shall be issued for a
term of ten years.
new text end

new text begin EFFECTIVE DATE. new text end

new text begin This section is effective the day following final enactment.
new text end

Sec. 5.

Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 116.03, subdivision 2b, is
amended to read:


Subd. 2b.

Permitting efficiency.

(a) It is the goal of the state that environmental and
resource management permits be issued or denied within 150 days of the submission of a
substantially completed permit application. The commissioner of the Pollution Control
Agency shall establish management systems designed to achieve the goal.

(b) The commissioner shall prepare semiannual permitting efficiency reports that
include statistics on meeting the goal in paragraph (a). The reports are due February 1
and August 1 each year. For permit applications that have not met the goal, the report
must state the reasons for not meeting the goal, steps that will be taken to complete action
on the application, and the expected timeline. In stating the reasons for not meeting the
goal, the commissioner shall separately identify delays caused by the responsiveness of
the proposer, lack of staff, scientific or technical disagreements, or the level of public
engagement. The report must specify the number of days from initial submission of the
application to the day of determination that the application is complete. The report for
August 1 each year must aggregate the data for the year and assess whether program
or system changes are necessary to achieve the goal. The report must be posted on the
agency's Web site and submitted to the governor and the chairs and ranking minority
members of the house of representatives and senate committees having jurisdiction over
environment policy and finance.

(c) The commissioner shall allow electronic submission of environmental review
and permit documents to the agency.

(d) Beginning July 1, 2011, within 30 business days of application for a permit
subject to paragraph (a), the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency shall notify the
project proposer, in writing, of deleted text beginwhether or not the permit application is complete enough
for processing. If the permit is incomplete, the commissioner must identify where
deleted text endnew text begin anynew text end
deficiencies deleted text beginexistdeleted text end and advise the applicant on how they can be remedied. deleted text beginA resubmittal of
the application begins a new 30-day review period. If the commissioner fails to notify the
project proposer of completeness within 30 business days, the application is deemed to be
substantially complete and subject to the 150-day permitting review period in paragraph
(a) from the date it was submitted.
deleted text end This paragraph does not apply to an application for a
permit that is subject to a grant or loan agreement under chapter 446A.

new text begin (e) For purposes of this subdivision, "permit applicant professional" means an
individual not employed by the Pollution Control Agency, who:
new text end

new text begin (1) has a professional license issued by the state of Minnesota in the subject area
of the permit; and
new text end

new text begin (2) has at least ten years of experience preparing applications for environmental
permits issued by the agency.
new text end

new text begin (f) All applicants relying on a permit applicant professional upon the agency's
request must participate in a meeting with the agency before submitting an application:
new text end

new text begin (1) during the preapplication meeting, the applicant must submit at least the
following:
new text end

new text begin (i) project description, including, but not limited to, scope of work, primary
emissions points, discharge outfalls, and water intake points;
new text end

new text begin (ii) location of the project, including county, municipality, and location on the
site; and
new text end

new text begin (iii) business schedule for project completion; and
new text end

new text begin (2) during the preapplication meeting, the agency shall provide for the applicant at
least the following:
new text end

new text begin (i) an overview of the permit review program;
new text end

new text begin (ii) a determination of which specific application or applications will be necessary
to complete the project;
new text end

new text begin (iii) a statement notifying the applicant if the specific permit being sought requires a
mandatory public hearing or comment period;
new text end

new text begin (iv) a review of the timetable established in the permit review program for the
specific permit being sought; and
new text end

new text begin (v) a determination of what information must be included in the application,
including a description of any required modeling or testing.
new text end

new text begin (g) The applicant may select a permit applicant professional to undertake the
preparation and review of the permit application.
new text end

new text begin (h) A permit application submitted by a permit applicant professional shall be
deemed complete and approved unless the terms and conditions in the permit application
submitted by the permit applicant professional are clearly erroneous under statute or rule.
The agency shall, within 30 days of receipt of an application, return to the applicant and
submitting permit applicant professional any application the agency deems contrary to
statute or rule, specifying the deficiencies of the application.
new text end

new text begin (i) A person aggrieved by a final decision of the agency under this section has the
right within 30 days from notice of the action to appeal the final action to the court
of appeals.
new text end

new text begin (j) Nothing in this section shall be construed to modify:
new text end

new text begin (1) any requirement of law that is necessary to retain federal delegation to or
assumption by the state; or
new text end

new text begin (2) the authority to implement a federal law or program.
new text end

new text begin (k) If, by July 1 of an odd-numbered year, a biennial appropriation law has not been
enacted for the agency to fund programs to protect the air, water, and land resources of
the state, until the biennial appropriation law is enacted, permits granted may not be
terminated or suspended for the term of the permits, nor shall they expire or not be
renewed without the consent of the permittee, except for breach or nonperformance of any
condition of the permit by the permittee that is an imminent threat to impair or destroy the
environment or injure the health, safety, or welfare of the citizens of the state.
new text end

Sec. 6.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116.07, subdivision 4a, is amended to read:


Subd. 4a.

Permits.

(a) The Pollution Control Agency may issue, continue in
effect or deny permits, under such conditions as it may prescribe for the prevention of
pollution, for the emission of air contaminants, or for the installation or operation of
any emission facility, air contaminant treatment facility, treatment facility, potential air
contaminant storage facility, or storage facility, or any part thereof, or for the sources
or emissions of noise pollution.

The Pollution Control Agency may also issue, continue in effect or deny permits,
under such conditions as it may prescribe for the prevention of pollution, for the storage,
collection, transportation, processing, or disposal of waste, or for the installation or
operation of any system or facility, or any part thereof, related to the storage, collection,
transportation, processing, or disposal of waste.

The agency may not issue a permit to a facility without analyzing and considering
the cumulative levels and effects of past and current environmental pollution from all
sources on the environment and residents of the geographic area within which the facility's
emissions are likely to be deposited, provided that the facility is located in a community in
a city of the first class in Hennepin County that meets all of the following conditions:

(1) is within a half mile of a site designated by the federal government as an EPA
superfund site due to residential arsenic contamination;

(2) a majority of the population are low-income persons of color and American
Indians;

(3) a disproportionate percent of the children have childhood lead poisoning, asthma,
or other environmentally related health problems;

(4) is located in a city that has experienced numerous air quality alert days of
dangerous air quality for sensitive populations between February 2007 and February
2008; and

(5) is located near the junctions of several heavily trafficked state and county
highways and two one-way streets which carry both truck and auto traffic.

The Pollution Control Agency may revoke or modify any permit issued under this
subdivision and section 116.081 whenever it is necessary, in the opinion of the agency, to
prevent or abate pollution.

(b) The Pollution Control Agency has the authority for approval over the siting,
expansion, or operation of a solid waste facility with regard to environmental issues.
However, the agency's issuance of a permit does not release the permittee from any
liability, penalty, or duty imposed by any applicable county ordinances. Nothing in this
chapter precludes, or shall be construed to preclude, a county from enforcing land use
controls, regulations, and ordinances existing at the time of the permit application and
adopted pursuant to sections 366.10 to 366.181, 394.21 to 394.37, or 462.351 to 462.365,
with regard to the siting, expansion, or operation of a solid waste facility.

new text begin (c) Except as prohibited by federal law, a person may commence construction,
reconstruction, replacement, or modification of any facility prior to the issuance of a
construction permit.
new text end

Sec. 7.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.03, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:


new text begin Subd. 1a. new text end

new text begin Agency. new text end

new text begin "Agency" means:
new text end

new text begin (1) a state department, commission, board, or other agency of the state however
titled; or
new text end

new text begin (2) a local governmental unit or instrumentality, only when that unit or
instrumentality is acting within existing legal authority to grant or deny a permit that
otherwise would be granted or denied by a state agency.
new text end

Sec. 8.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.03, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:


new text begin Subd. 4. new text end

new text begin Local governmental unit. new text end

new text begin "Local governmental unit" means a county,
city, town, or special district with legal authority to issue a permit.
new text end

Sec. 9.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.03, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:


new text begin Subd. 5. new text end

new text begin Permit. new text end

new text begin "Permit" means a permit, certificate, certification, approval,
compliance schedule, or other similar document pertaining to a regulatory or management
program related to the protection, conservation, or use of, or interference with, the
natural resources of land, air, or water that must be obtained from a state agency before
constructing or operating a project in the state.
new text end

Sec. 10.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.03, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:


new text begin Subd. 6. new text end

new text begin Person. new text end

new text begin "Person" means an individual; an association or partnership; or
a cooperative, municipal, public, or private corporation, including, but not limited to, a
state agency and a county.
new text end

Sec. 11.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.03, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:


new text begin Subd. 7. new text end

new text begin Project. new text end

new text begin "Project" means a new activity or an expansion of or addition to
an existing activity, which is fixed in location and for which permits are required from
an agency prior to construction or operation, including, but not limited to, industrial and
commercial operations and developments.
new text end

Sec. 12.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116J.035, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:


new text begin Subd. 8. new text end

new text begin Environmental permits coordinator. new text end

new text begin (a) The commissioner is designated
the environmental permits coordinator and shall coordinate the implementation and
administration of state permits, including:
new text end

new text begin (1) establishing a mechanism in state government that will coordinate administrative
decision-making procedures and related quasijudicial and judicial review pertaining to
permits related to the state's air, land, and water resources;
new text end

new text begin (2) providing better coordination and understanding between federal, state, and local
governmental units in the administration of the various programs relating to air, water,
and land resources;
new text end

new text begin (3) identifying all existing federal, state, and local permits and other approvals;
compliance schedules; or other programs that pertain to the use of natural resources and
protection of the environment; and
new text end

new text begin (4) recommending legislative or administrative modifications to existing permit
programs to increase their efficiency and utility.
new text end

new text begin (b) A person proposing a project may apply to the environmental permits coordinator
for assistance in obtaining necessary state permits and other approvals. Upon request, the
environmental permits coordinator shall provide the requesting person:
new text end

new text begin (1) a list of all necessary federal, state, and local permits and other approvals for
the project;
new text end

new text begin (2) a plan that will coordinate federal, state, and local administrative decision-making
practices, including monitoring; analysis and reporting; public comments and hearings;
and issuances of permits and approvals;
new text end

new text begin (3) a timeline for the issuance of all federal, state, and local permits and other
approvals required for the project to coordinate the execution of any memorandum of
understanding between the person proposing a project and any federal, state, or local
agency;
new text end

new text begin (4) coordinate all federal, state, or local public comment periods and hearings;
new text end

new text begin (5) coordinate the publication and public notice of all draft permits and draft
environmental assessment worksheet or impact statement; and
new text end

new text begin (6) other assistance necessary to obtain final approval and issuance of all federal,
state, and local permits and other approvals required for the project.
new text end

new text begin (c) As necessary, the environmental permits coordinator shall assess the project
proposer for reasonable costs that a state agency incurs in coordinating the implementation
and administration of state permits and the proposer shall pay the assessed costs to
the environmental permits coordinator. Money received by the environmental permits
coordinator must be credited to an account in the special revenue fund and is appropriated
to the affected state agency to cover the assessed costs incurred by the state agency under
this subdivision.
new text end

new text begin (d) The coordination of the implementation and administration of state permits is not
governmental action under section 116D.04.
new text end

Sec. 13. new text begin REPEALER.
new text end

new text begin Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 103G.291, subdivision 4, new text end new text begin is repealed.
new text end

ARTICLE 2

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Section 1.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 41A.10, subdivision 1, is amended to read:


Subdivision 1.

Definitions.

For the purposes of this section and section 103F.518,
the terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them.

(a) "Cellulosic biofuel" means transportation fuel derived from cellulosic materials.

(b) "Cellulosic material" means an agricultural new text beginor wood new text endfeedstock primarily
comprised of cellulose, hemicellulose, or lignin or a combination of those ingredients
grown on agricultural landsnew text begin or harvested on timber landsnew text end.

(c) "Agricultural land" means land used for horticultural, row, close grown, pasture,
and hayland crops; growing nursery stocks; animal feedlots; farm yards; associated
building sites; and public and private drainage systems and field roads located on any of
that land.

(d) "Cellulosic biofuel facility" means a facility at which cellulosic biofuel is
produced.

(e) "Perennial crops" means agriculturally produced plants that have a life cycle of at
least three years at the location where the plants are being cultivated.

(f) "Perennial cropping system" means an agricultural production system that
utilizes a perennial crop.

(g) "Native species" means a plant species which was present in a defined area of
Minnesota prior to European settlement (circa 1850). A defined area may be an ecological
classification province. Wild-type varieties therefore are regional or local ecotypes that
have not undergone a selection process.

(h) "Diverse native prairie" means a prairie planted from a mix of local Minnesota
native prairie species. A selection from all available native prairie species may be made so
as to match species appropriate to local site conditions.

(i) "Commissioner" means the commissioner of agriculture.

Sec. 2.

Minnesota Statutes 2011 Supplement, section 116D.04, subdivision 2a, is
amended to read:


Subd. 2a.

When prepared.

Where there is potential for significant environmental
effects resulting from any major governmental action, the action shall be preceded by a
detailed environmental impact statement prepared by the responsible governmental unit.
The environmental impact statement shall be an analytical rather than an encyclopedic
document which describes the proposed action in detail, analyzes its significant
environmental impacts, discusses appropriate alternatives to the proposed action and
their impacts, and explores methods by which adverse environmental impacts of an
action could be mitigated. The environmental impact statement shall also analyze those
economic, employment and sociological effects that cannot be avoided should the action
be implemented. To ensure its use in the decision-making process, the environmental
impact statement shall be prepared as early as practical in the formulation of an action.
No mandatory environmental impact statement may be required for an ethanol plant, as
defined in section 41A.09, subdivision 2a, paragraph (b), new text begina biobutanol facility, as defined
in section 41A.105, subdivision 1a, clause (1), or a cellulosic biofuel facility, as defined
in section 41A.10, subdivision 1, paragraph (d),
new text end that produces less than 125,000,000
gallons of ethanolnew text begin, biobutanol, or cellulosic biofuel new text end annually and is located outside of the
seven-county metropolitan area.

(a) The board shall by rule establish categories of actions for which environmental
impact statements and for which environmental assessment worksheets shall be prepared
as well as categories of actions for which no environmental review is required under this
section. A mandatory environmental assessment worksheet shall not be required for the
expansion of an ethanol plant, as defined in section 41A.09, subdivision 2a, paragraph
(b), or the conversion of an ethanol plant to a biobutanol facility or the expansion of a
biobutanol facility as defined in section 41A.105, subdivision 1a, based on the capacity
of the expanded or converted facility to produce alcohol fuel, but must be required if
the ethanol plant new text beginor biobutanol facilitynew text end meets or exceeds thresholds of other categories
of actions for which environmental assessment worksheets must be prepared. The
responsible governmental unit for an ethanol plant new text beginor biobutanol facilitynew text end project for which
an environmental assessment worksheet is prepared shall be the state agency with the
greatest responsibility for supervising or approving the project as a whole.

(b) The responsible governmental unit shall promptly publish notice of the
completion of an environmental assessment worksheet in a manner to be determined by
the board and shall provide copies of the environmental assessment worksheet to the board
and its member agencies. Comments on the need for an environmental impact statement
may be submitted to the responsible governmental unit during a 30-day period following
publication of the notice that an environmental assessment worksheet has been completed.
The responsible governmental unit's decision on the need for an environmental impact
statement shall be based on the environmental assessment worksheet and the comments
received during the comment period, and shall be made within 15 days after the close of
the comment period. The board's chair may extend the 15-day period by not more than 15
additional days upon the request of the responsible governmental unit.

(c) An environmental assessment worksheet shall also be prepared for a proposed
action whenever material evidence accompanying a petition by not less than 100
individuals who reside or own property in the state, submitted before the proposed
project has received final approval by the appropriate governmental units, demonstrates
that, because of the nature or location of a proposed action, there may be potential for
significant environmental effects. Petitions requesting the preparation of an environmental
assessment worksheet shall be submitted to the board. The chair of the board shall
determine the appropriate responsible governmental unit and forward the petition to it.
A decision on the need for an environmental assessment worksheet shall be made by
the responsible governmental unit within 15 days after the petition is received by the
responsible governmental unit. The board's chair may extend the 15-day period by not
more than 15 additional days upon request of the responsible governmental unit.

(d) Except in an environmentally sensitive location where Minnesota Rules, part
4410.4300, subpart 29, item B, applies, the proposed action is exempt from environmental
review under this chapter and rules of the board, if:

(1) the proposed action is:

(i) an animal feedlot facility with a capacity of less than 1,000 animal units; or

(ii) an expansion of an existing animal feedlot facility with a total cumulative
capacity of less than 1,000 animal units;

(2) the application for the animal feedlot facility includes a written commitment by
the proposer to design, construct, and operate the facility in full compliance with Pollution
Control Agency feedlot rules; and

(3) the county board holds a public meeting for citizen input at least ten business
days prior to the Pollution Control Agency or county issuing a feedlot permit for the
animal feedlot facility unless another public meeting for citizen input has been held with
regard to the feedlot facility to be permitted. The exemption in this paragraph is in
addition to other exemptions provided under other law and rules of the board.

(e) The board may, prior to final approval of a proposed project, require preparation
of an environmental assessment worksheet by a responsible governmental unit selected
by the board for any action where environmental review under this section has not been
specifically provided for by rule or otherwise initiated.

(f) An early and open process shall be utilized to limit the scope of the environmental
impact statement to a discussion of those impacts, which, because of the nature or location
of the project, have the potential for significant environmental effects. The same process
shall be utilized to determine the form, content and level of detail of the statement as well
as the alternatives which are appropriate for consideration in the statement. In addition,
the permits which will be required for the proposed action shall be identified during the
scoping process. Further, the process shall identify those permits for which information
will be developed concurrently with the environmental impact statement. The board
shall provide in its rules for the expeditious completion of the scoping process. The
determinations reached in the process shall be incorporated into the order requiring the
preparation of an environmental impact statement.

(g) The responsible governmental unit shall, to the extent practicable, avoid
duplication and ensure coordination between state and federal environmental review
and between environmental review and environmental permitting. Whenever practical,
information needed by a governmental unit for making final decisions on permits or
other actions required for a proposed project shall be developed in conjunction with the
preparation of an environmental impact statement.

(h) An environmental impact statement shall be prepared and its adequacy
determined within 280 days after notice of its preparation unless the time is extended by
consent of the parties or by the governor for good cause. The responsible governmental
unit shall determine the adequacy of an environmental impact statement, unless within 60
days after notice is published that an environmental impact statement will be prepared,
the board chooses to determine the adequacy of an environmental impact statement. If an
environmental impact statement is found to be inadequate, the responsible governmental
unit shall have 60 days to prepare an adequate environmental impact statement.

(i) The proposer of a specific action may include in the information submitted to the
responsible governmental unit a preliminary draft environmental impact statement under
this section on that action for review, modification, and determination of completeness and
adequacy by the responsible governmental unit. A preliminary draft environmental impact
statement prepared by the project proposer and submitted to the responsible governmental
unit shall identify or include as an appendix all studies and other sources of information
used to substantiate the analysis contained in the preliminary draft environmental impact
statement. The responsible governmental unit shall require additional studies, if needed,
and obtain from the project proposer all additional studies and information necessary for
the responsible governmental unit to perform its responsibility to review, modify, and
determine the completeness and adequacy of the environmental impact statement.

Sec. 3.

Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 116D.04, is amended by adding a subdivision
to read:


new text begin Subd. 5b. new text end

new text begin Review and repeal of environmental assessment worksheets and
impact statements.
new text end

new text begin By December 1, 2012, and each year thereafter, the Environmental
Quality Board, Pollution Control Agency, Department of Natural Resources, and
Department of Transportation, after consultation with political subdivisions, shall submit
to the governor; the Legislative Coordinating Commission; the chairs of the house of
representatives and senate committees having jurisdiction over environment and natural
resources; and the revisor of statutes a list of categories of mandatory environmental
assessment worksheets or mandatory environmental impact statements for which the
agency or a political subdivision is designated as the responsible government unit, and
for each worksheet or statement, a document including:
new text end

new text begin (1) intended outcomes of the specific worksheet or statement;
new text end

new text begin (2) the cost to state and local government and the private sector;
new text end

new text begin (3) the relationship of the worksheet or statement to other local, state, and federal
permits; and
new text end

new text begin (4) a justification for why the mandatory worksheet or statement should not be
eliminated and its intended outcomes achieved through an existing permit or other federal,
state, or local law.
new text end