Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

SF 1270

as introduced - 90th Legislature (2017 - 2018) Posted on 03/15/2017 02:31pm

KEY: stricken = removed, old language.
underscored = added, new language.

Current Version - as introduced

Line numbers 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4

A bill for an act
relating to state lands; authorizing public sale of certain tax-forfeited land that
borders public water.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1. new text begin PUBLIC SALE OF TAX-FORFEITED LANDS BORDERING PUBLIC
WATER; POLK COUNTY.
new text end

new text begin (a) Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, sections 92.45 and 282.018, subdivision 1, Polk
County may sell the tax-forfeited lands bordering public water that are described in paragraph
(c) under the remaining provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 282.
new text end

new text begin (b) The conveyances must be in a form approved by the attorney general. The attorney
general may make changes to the land descriptions to correct errors and ensure accuracy.
new text end

new text begin (c) The land to be sold is located in Polk County and is described as:
new text end

new text begin (1) Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, subject to railway easement, Block 54, Carman Townsite, city
of Crookston (parcel number 82.02352.00);
new text end

new text begin (2) Lots 5 and 6, Block 54, Carman Townsite, city of Crookston (parcel number
82.02352.01);
new text end

new text begin (3) the North 7.30 acres of the East 13.60 acres of Lot 3, Section 26, Township 150,
Range 48 (parcel number 24.00170.00);
new text end

new text begin (4) Lot 5, Block 2, Northern Lights Addition, city of Erskine (parcel number
45.00504.00); and
new text end

new text begin (5) part of Government Lot 9, Section 36, Township 150, Range 47 (parcel number
82.00129.00).
new text end

new text begin (d) The county has determined that the county's land management interests would best
be served if the lands were returned to private ownership.
new text end