Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature

HF 3534

as introduced - 81st Legislature (1999 - 2000) Posted on 12/15/2009 12:00am

KEY: stricken = removed, old language.
underscored = added, new language.
  1.1                          A bill for an act 
  1.2             relating to agriculture; changing certain requirements 
  1.3             and enforcement procedures for agricultural contracts; 
  1.4             amending Minnesota Statutes 1998, sections 17.90, by 
  1.5             adding a subdivision; and 17.91; proposing coding for 
  1.6             new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 17. 
  1.7   BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 
  1.8      Section 1.  Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 17.90, is 
  1.9   amended by adding a subdivision to read: 
  1.10     Subd. 3a.  [LEGIBLE TYPE.] "Legible type" means a typeface 
  1.11  at least as large as ten-point modern type, one-point leaded. 
  1.12     Sec. 2.  Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 17.91, is amended 
  1.13  to read: 
  1.14     17.91 [MEDIATION; ARBITRATION REQUIRED LANGUAGE.] 
  1.15     Subdivision 1.  [MEDIATION; ARBITRATION.] A contract for an 
  1.16  agricultural commodity between a contractor and a producer must 
  1.17  contain language providing for resolution of contract disputes 
  1.18  by either mediation or arbitration.  If there is a contract 
  1.19  dispute, either party may make a written request to the 
  1.20  commissioner for mediation or arbitration services as specified 
  1.21  in the contract, to facilitate resolution of the dispute. 
  1.22     Subd. 2.  [WRITTEN DISCLOSURE OF RISKS.] A contract for an 
  1.23  agricultural commodity between a producer and a contractor must 
  1.24  be accompanied by a clear written disclosure setting forth the 
  1.25  nature and extent of the risks faced by the producer if the 
  1.26  producer enters into the contract.  The statement must meet the 
  2.1   plain language requirements of section 17.943. 
  2.2      Sec. 3.  [17.941] [PRODUCER'S RIGHT TO REVIEW.] 
  2.3      To provide a producer opportunity to obtain legal, 
  2.4   financial, and other advice, no agricultural contract is 
  2.5   effective unless the producer is given a copy of the proposed 
  2.6   contract at least three business days before signing.  If a 
  2.7   contract is signed before three business days have elapsed since 
  2.8   the producer received the contract, the producer has three 
  2.9   business days after receipt of a copy of the contract to cancel 
  2.10  the contract.  The three-day period runs until the close of 
  2.11  business on the third business day after the day on which the 
  2.12  producer receives a copy of the contract. 
  2.13     Sec. 4.  [17.942] [COVER SHEET REQUIREMENTS.] 
  2.14     Subdivision 1.  [MANDATORY COVER PAGE.] An agricultural 
  2.15  contract entered into, amended, or renewed after July 1, 2000, 
  2.16  must contain as the first page, or first page of text if it is 
  2.17  preceded by a title page or pages, a cover sheet as provided in 
  2.18  this section. 
  2.19     Subd. 2.  [REQUIREMENTS.] The cover sheet or sheets must 
  2.20  comply with section 17.943, and must contain the following: 
  2.21     (1) a brief statement that the document is a legal contract 
  2.22  between the contractor and the producer; 
  2.23     (2) the statement "READ YOUR CONTRACT CAREFULLY.  This 
  2.24  cover sheet provides only a brief summary of your contract.  
  2.25  This is not the contract and only the terms of the actual 
  2.26  contract are legally binding.  The contract itself sets forth, 
  2.27  in detail, the rights and obligations of both you and the 
  2.28  contractor.  IT IS THEREFORE IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ YOUR 
  2.29  CONTRACT CAREFULLY."; 
  2.30     (3) the written disclosure of risks required by section 
  2.31  17.91, subdivision 2; 
  2.32     (4) a statement detailing, in plain language, the 
  2.33  producer's right to review the contract as described in section 
  2.34  17.941; and 
  2.35     (5) an index of the major provisions of the contract and 
  2.36  the pages on which they are found, including: 
  3.1      (i) the names of all parties to the contract; 
  3.2      (ii) the definition sections of the policy; 
  3.3      (iii) the provisions governing cancellation, renewal, or 
  3.4   amendment of the contract by either party; 
  3.5      (iv) the duties or obligations of each party; and 
  3.6      (v) any options under the contract. 
  3.7      Sec. 5.  [17.943] [CONTRACT FORMAT.] 
  3.8      Subdivision 1.  [READABILITY.] An agricultural contract 
  3.9   must be in legible type, appropriately divided and captioned by 
  3.10  its various sections, and written in clear and coherent language 
  3.11  using words and grammar that are understandable by a person of 
  3.12  average intelligence and education. 
  3.13     Subd. 2.  [EXCEPTIONS.] Subdivision 1 does not apply to 
  3.14  particular words, phrases, provisions, or forms of agreement 
  3.15  specifically required, recommended, or endorsed by a state or 
  3.16  federal statute, rule, or regulation. 
  3.17     Subd. 3.  [CUSTOMARILY USED TERMS.] An agricultural 
  3.18  contract may include technical terms to describe the services or 
  3.19  property which are the subject of the contract, if the terms are 
  3.20  customarily used by producers in the ordinary course of business 
  3.21  in connection with the services or property being described. 
  3.22     Sec. 6.  [17.944] [REVIEW BY ATTORNEY GENERAL.] 
  3.23     Subdivision 1.  [PROCESS OF REVIEW.] A contractor may 
  3.24  submit an agricultural contract to the attorney general for 
  3.25  review as to whether it complies with section 17.943.  After 
  3.26  reviewing the contract, the attorney general shall: 
  3.27     (1) certify that the contract complies with section 17.943; 
  3.28     (2) decline to certify that the contract complies with 
  3.29  section 17.943 and note objections; 
  3.30     (3) decline to review the contract because the contract's 
  3.31  compliance with section 17.943 is subject to pending litigation; 
  3.32  or 
  3.33     (4) decline to review the contract because the contract is 
  3.34  not subject to section 17.943. 
  3.35     Subd. 2.  [FACTORS IN DETERMINING READABILITY.] In 
  3.36  determining whether a contract or cover sheet is readable within 
  4.1   the meaning of section 17.943, the attorney general shall 
  4.2   consider at least the following factors: 
  4.3      (1) the simplicity of the sentence structure; 
  4.4      (2) the extent to which commonly used and understood words 
  4.5   are employed; 
  4.6      (3) the extent to which esoteric legal terms are avoided; 
  4.7      (4) the extent to which references to other sections or 
  4.8   provisions of the contract are minimized; 
  4.9      (5) the Flesch scale analysis readability score as outlined 
  4.10  in section 72C.09; 
  4.11     (6) the extent to which clear definitions are used in the 
  4.12  text of the contract; and 
  4.13     (7) additional factors relevant to the readability or 
  4.14  understandability of the contract. 
  4.15     Subd. 3.  [PROCESS NOT REVIEWABLE.] Actions of the attorney 
  4.16  general under subdivision 1 are not subject to chapter 14 and 
  4.17  are not appealable. 
  4.18     Subd. 4.  [LIMITED EFFECT OF CERTIFICATION.] A contract 
  4.19  certified under subdivision 1 is deemed to comply with section 
  4.20  17.943.  Certification of a contract under subdivision 1 does 
  4.21  not constitute an approval of the contract's legality or legal 
  4.22  effect. 
  4.23     Subd. 5.  [REVIEW NOT REQUIRED.] Failure to submit a 
  4.24  contract to the attorney general for review under subdivision 1 
  4.25  does not show a lack of good faith or raise a presumption that 
  4.26  the contract violates section 17.943. 
  4.27     Subd. 6.  [ENFORCEMENT REMEDIES.] A violation of section 
  4.28  17.943 is a violation subject to section 8.31, subdivision 1.  
  4.29  The remedies in section 8.31, subdivisions 3 and 3a, are limited 
  4.30  by section 17.9441. 
  4.31     Subd. 7.  [REFORMATION.] (a) In addition to the remedies 
  4.32  provided in section 8.31, a court reviewing an agricultural 
  4.33  contract may change the terms of the contract or limit a 
  4.34  provision to avoid an unfair result if it finds that: 
  4.35     (1) a material provision of the contract violates section 
  4.36  17.943; 
  5.1      (2) the violation caused the producer to be substantially 
  5.2   confused about any of the rights, obligations, or remedies of 
  5.3   the contract; and 
  5.4      (3) the violation has caused or is likely to cause 
  5.5   financial detriment to the producer. 
  5.6      (b) If the court reforms or limits a provision of a 
  5.7   contract, the court shall also make orders necessary to avoid 
  5.8   unjust enrichment.  Bringing a claim for relief under this 
  5.9   subdivision does not entitle a producer to withhold performance 
  5.10  of an otherwise valid contractual obligation.  No relief may be 
  5.11  granted under this subdivision unless the claim is brought 
  5.12  before the obligations of the contract have been fully performed.
  5.13     Sec. 7.  [17.9441] [LIMITS ON REMEDIES.] 
  5.14     Subdivision 1.  [PENALTIES.] In a proceeding in which civil 
  5.15  penalties are claimed from a party for a violation of section 
  5.16  17.943, it is a defense to the claim that the party made a good 
  5.17  faith and reasonable effort to comply with section 17.943. 
  5.18     Subd. 2.  [ATTORNEY'S FEES.] A party who has made a good 
  5.19  faith and reasonable effort to comply with section 17.943 may 
  5.20  not be assessed attorney's fees or costs of investigation in an 
  5.21  action for violating section 17.943. 
  5.22     Subd. 3.  [CLASS ACTION ATTORNEY'S FEES.] In a class action 
  5.23  or series of class actions that arise from the use by a 
  5.24  contractor of an agricultural contract found to violate section 
  5.25  17.943, the amount of attorney's fees and costs of investigation 
  5.26  assessed against that contractor and in favor of the class or 
  5.27  classes may not exceed $10,000. 
  5.28     Subd. 4.  [LIMITS ON PRODUCER ACTIONS.] Violation of 
  5.29  section 17.943 is not a defense to a claim arising from a 
  5.30  producer's breach of an agricultural contract.  A producer may 
  5.31  recover actual damages caused by a violation of section 17.943 
  5.32  only if the violation caused the producer to not understand 
  5.33  about the rights, obligations, or remedies of the contract. 
  5.34     Subd. 5.  [STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.] A claim that an 
  5.35  agricultural contract violates section 17.943 must be raised 
  5.36  within six years of the date the contract is executed by the 
  6.1   producer.